Rage: Get over it.

Recommended Videos

CountryMike

New member
Jul 26, 2008
94
0
0
Kwaku Avoke said:
Things like this really aren't fair to offline gamers. Its perfectly reasonable to buy an expensive console and a $60 game and expect all the content of said game. DLC is ok as long as it is available on disk.
It's 2011. Who doesn't have internet? It's as strange as having no running water or electricity.
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
People don't want to spend money. Gamers feel like they are entitled to every bit of content that a developer makes for a game. I don't know why gamers feel that if a company makes something for a game they deserve it for free. I think ti's just tradition. Anyways, as a result gamers don't want to pay for they see as theirs from the start. In actuality you can't prove that all content is mandatory to be released together and you can't say that your in the right anymore then the developer can. Anyways, I think lots of people are upset because they see the entire single player experience being cut off rather then just one level. That's a miscommunication problem (which isn't helped by the deceptive Escapist story title on the issue).
 

Baradiel

New member
Mar 4, 2009
1,077
0
0
Not going to lie, I read the title of this thread as "Rape: Get over it"...

I have no intention of gett Rage. No idea what its about, really, and I have hno interest in it.

But I fully support the developers with this. I buy pre-owned games all the time. I got Mass Effect 2 pre-owned (I didn't know at the time. Same price as new, with the sanem stickers. Bastards at Game.) so I haven't got Zaeed. It doesn't matter to me. I didn't enjoy the game less because I didn't have something, because I never had it.

Seriously, cry me a river, build a bridge, and get over it.


Captcha: Israeli Life... Lets not get political, captcha...
 

Silenttalker22

New member
Dec 21, 2010
171
0
0
Glademaster said:
but don't pretend to be humble when you are basically calling another's opinion childish.
This. I was with your demeanor at first (even if the free time you have to spend correcting people is unsettling). But throwing in "Have some tea and calm down deary" or w/e, for starters, switched me to "Oh this is just another person who thinks their thought-out rationale is the only right one, and is actually pretty self-righteous". Your condescension belies your noble facade.

OT: Don't care if it's a rip. Rage looks good and I already have it reserved. :D
 

Elfgore

Your friendly local nihilist
Legacy
Dec 6, 2010
5,655
24
13
I have to agree. This whole boycotting Rage just because they made you buy it new to play a lttle sewer area. But the ones that make me mad are the ones that limit multiplayer, like Bulletstorm. I just think thats is too important to make people pay for an online pass if they buy it used.
 

suitepee7

I can smell sausage rolls
Dec 6, 2010
1,273
0
0
my main problem is what the money is being spent on.

see it goes to the publishers, but i don't know about the money going to the devs themselves. i would be happy to pay the extra money to exclusively being put towards future titles by those devs, or being put into paying for the servers being maintained for online play.

however the money going to publishers, for a single player cuts out the server maintainability, so i just do not know where my money is going, or if it is just being put straight into the publishers profits. so yeah, i'm not overly happy about this, but i don't expect i'll pick this game unless there's a steam sale.

that brings me to point 2, the lack of older games being available for purchase in game stores in the first place. steam is awesome because it is always a 'new' copy, but the prices go down in time to reflect how old the games are, and the prices are usually the same as a preowned copy elsewhere. the problem lies when you go to console games. once the game is 3-4 months old, new copies tend to disappear, and the only place i can then find these games, is preowned.

so i think a large part of the blame should be placed on stores themselves, and publishers should try to work out a better deal with them, rather than the online dlc malarky.


Elfgore said:
I have to agree. This whole boycotting Rage just because they made you buy it new to play a lttle sewer area. But the ones that make me mad are the ones that limit multiplayer, like Bulletstorm. I just think thats is too important to make people pay for an online pass if they buy it used.
but online is the part (if any) which would need the extra cash, because it needs server maintenance costs. it makes little sense to charge for single player experiences.

tbh Rage should have worded it differently. instead of saying second hand purchases have cut content, they should have said that new copies come with a small piece of bonus dlc, which would have sounded more like a reward for people who purchase new, rather than a punishment for those who get it preowned
 

The Wykydtron

"Emotions are very important!"
Sep 23, 2010
5,458
0
0
viranimus said:
Lyri said:
I, humbly so.
Tell you all to build a bridge and get over it. You are likely going to damage a pristine triple A titles reputation and profits because you think you're being treated unfairly.
Are you that misinformed?
With all due respect.... No. I wont get over it. Will I damage a repuation of games that are doing this? You absolutely better believe I will. You ask if the people pissed off at this are misinformed, yet your completely ignoring why people are up in arms about this.

It is so astronomically simple.

If you give them an inch they will take a mile. Thats it, right there. Its also the reason why people say "Freedom isnt free, it costs eternal vigilance"

SNIP (Slightly)
Edit: Look I get that the cut in RAGE is not even really a cut at all. But at the same time you have to understand that in many cases events can end up adversely effecting unrelated things in ways you can never hope to predict. After letting so many little ones slide, at what point do you try to put on the breaks>?
Oh man and here i was thinking drama was dead, well done sir! You are awesome! Please say you were doing at least a few dramatic arm flails and heart cluches while you were typing that. Too many people think drama is a bad thing...

Excuse me i need to rewatch a certain scene in Code Geass because of that...
 

GestaltEsper

New member
Oct 11, 2009
324
0
0
Normally I stay outta topics like this but I gotta ask something to the "Where does it end" crowd: Did you support Sony when it removed Linux because it could be used for piracy? Or any other anti-piracy measures?
 

GestaltEsper

New member
Oct 11, 2009
324
0
0
Lyri said:
Once upon a time we used to love gaming companies giving away goodies but now unless it comes shitting a golden egg we don't want it.
I think that accurately sums things up. Hell, last year people were saying that extra content and limited editions were the way to go. Now look at the latest topic about it and all you'll see is "Make it cheaper," "Make it actually worth the money," or my favorite "How about not making a shit game."
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,093
0
0
Reaper69lol said:
Thank you! Also, I gota ask, how many people actually buy used games? I hardly know anyone who buys used games, or hard copies in general.
Oh you silly, half my library is used.

OP: Stop using the if you buy second hand it won't work as new argument. If I buy a book second hand it usually still has all of its pages. If I buy a car second hand it has all of its parts. Its not being intentionally sabotaged and then being bragged about by the developer. That's what people are mainly pissed off about.
 

NotSoLoneWanderer

New member
Jul 5, 2011
765
0
0
CountryMike said:
Kwaku Avoke said:
Things like this really aren't fair to offline gamers. Its perfectly reasonable to buy an expensive console and a $60 game and expect all the content of said game. DLC is ok as long as it is available on disk.
It's 2011. Who doesn't have internet? It's as strange as having no running water or electricity.
Yeah it's strange but i just got it back a few weeks ago. Xbox live cards are expensive when your saving up for things and don't get allowance.
 

Macrobstar

New member
Apr 28, 2010
896
0
0
Sjakie said:
Dont really care what you think.
I dont like it and think it's still a ripoff for anybody who might buy the game brand new in 2-4 months and might have to do without that content or pay extra to download it by then!

My main gripe is that content gets praised as 'bonus on pre-order' while it actually is 'premium content'. With premium i mean that you pay (often extra) for it.

I have no trouble with premium content, BUT DONT FUCKING SAY IT'S A BONUS WHICH IT CLEARLY IS NOT!!!1!



i feel a bit better now.
Well guess what, it delights me to tell you that you won't make a differance, loads people will still buy rage and then presumably the games industry will collapse and the world will end
 

Macrobstar

New member
Apr 28, 2010
896
0
0
Draech said:
Its a vote with your money situation and these are the scenarios that can unfold. Im only taking into account the people who had decided they were going to buy it.

A: You were going to buy the game new and you still will after the news
Conclusion: I has no effect on your choice of purchase because it has no effect on the quality of your game.

B: You were going to buy the game used and you still will after the news
Conclusion: The game you have bought is slightly cheaper than a new game, but is inferior. However not inferior enough for you to pay more for a new copy.

C: You were going to buy the game used and you wont after the news
Conclusion: You feel you are being unfairly treated and will therefore not support the game or the developer. However if you were going to buy used anyway then the developer wont see any of that money in the first place making your boycott pointless.

D: You were going to buy the game new and you wont after the news
Conclusion: You are Boycotting out of principal even thou it has no effect on the quality of your purchase or your future purchase.

E: You were going to buy the game used and you will buy the game new after the news
Conclusion: Project Ten dollar works as intended.
Wow so much this
 

Scizophrenic Llama

Is in space!
Dec 5, 2007
1,147
0
0
I don't see how this has been so surprising to people. It's already been done before [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/93833-Dragon-Age-Comes-With-Free-DLC-Armor].

DA:O wasn't in the project $10 boat, it was a buy the game new and get access to one of the best characters in the game who clearly was supposed to be a part of the vanilla game from the start.

I can't believe people are bitching about losing a little section of a game that takes 22GB of a 360's hard-drive [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.305638-RAGE-Devours-Xbox-360-Hard-Drives]. Surely the 200 or so MB download(I would imagine that is how large the additional section will be) will make all of the difference in your opinion of the game.

Claiming that allowing them to do this would let them do it more is a moot point because this has been happening for a while with EA and it has already started to catch on. You're past the point of stopping it. AAA titles like this will sell well regardless of if you do a petty little rant and attempt a protest, and yet this is likely to continue in the future.
 

Morbissus

New member
Jun 9, 2011
43
0
0
Publishers could go after Gamestop & Best Buy for not getting a % on used games. I guess it's easier to go after an amorphous mass of I agree, I disagree & I don't care than to get into a legal battle with the corporate entities that are really screwing them.
 

GonzoGamer

New member
Apr 9, 2008
7,063
0
0
I was over it the moment I decided to not buy it and just put it on my rental list instead.
I seem to be doing that a lot lately and it's actually working out better. Most of these games are only worth a rental anyway.