intheweeds said:
I'm a straight guy but I find both of those women attractive. Or I don't know... interesting. Most of my writing I seem to end up writing about butch women though I've never developed their relationships much. I learn from the mistakes of Ian Fleming: if you can't write romance/intimacy well, then don't write it at all*. So their sexuality is always ambiguous if not irrelevant.
(*that's what I can't stand about Fleming, he is awful at romance and intimacy. Classic British male author, really: Good at adventure and high-living but no clue with women. Not that I know personally that much, but I do know what I don't know... if you know what I mean.)
But yeah, the way I like my protagonists are female but tough and no nonsense, especially no nonsense like high-heels, fancy hair or impractical nails. And yeah, the rebooted (first reboot TR: Legends/Anniversary) I just found to be too fragrant and fancy. The original Lara, was much more in the right direction.
or consider this evolution of Lara Croft:
over the years she has gotten curvier, the neckline of her top has plunged and more of her midriff exposed, pointlessly. She seemed to be wearing a one-piece swimming costume and shorts originally, but now this silly tank-top and ultra tight and tiny shorts. Yeah, she is latterly more attractive but I'd much rather BE the original Lara with a snarly grin of a woman you don't want to fuck with, not the fragrant semi-pout of latter Lara.
Oh god, Anniversary; they made her a wimp, getting all tearful over shooting a guy twice her size who was about to kill her. I get it that women are more in touch with their feelings, but why should she even feel bad about defending herself from a murderous scumbag? She should be relieved she survived and succeeded. Lara is supposed to be a female adventurer to hold her own with the likes of Zorro, Indiana Jones and James Bond. Indy when faced by a swordsman just pulls his gun and calmly shoots him, and not beat himself up over it afterwards.