It might not be "stealing" as such, but the fact is that Microsoft is doing something here that inconveniences a lot of consumers. Monopolies like these are the method Microsoft used to become big in software and computers; they'd suffocate the opposition out of having anything original by buying out the producer.scotth266 said:He was wrong to call it stealing, and you are too. It's called COMPETITIVE PRACTICES.
Every time they do that, it pulls down the value of owning that competitor's piece of equipment, which for the consumer who bought that rather than the others, is plain shitty. Objecting to that isn't fanboyism. It's just common sense not to like it.
Besides, such tactics put the future of the industry as a whole in question. If Microsoft uses its endless resources to do this here, eventually they might be the only major games company. And while it's true that developers won't disappear, it's likely that in trying to please Microsoft's practices, a lot of variety and diversity will be lost. Not to mention how many people who buy the other console - for whatever reason - will be cheated out of the full value of their cash in the meantime.