Wise choice my friend, because this article reads like it was written by an alien who got his idea on human sexual relationships from XBOX Live and Ayn Rand, it's THAT bad. But it gets even better because the author of the article Donovan Sharpe describes himself as, and I quote:tf2godz said:(read the title)The Jovian said:Yeah, tell me about it. My favorite article by them so far is this http://www.returnofkings.com/76238/3-ways-to-keep-your-woman-from-cheating
It's about as tactful and respectful of women as you can imagine.
I'm not reading that. No one should give these people clicks they are insane. even if it wasn't disrespectful towards woman it still spreads paranoia and distrusted to relationships. your significant other is not a dog that you should hit with a rolled up newspaper when you think they're doing something wrong
And just because I hate my sanity I checked his Twitter and, yes he does live up to his own description.Donovan is a sexist son of a ***** who objectifies women by keeping them on their toes, their backs, and their knees where they belong. He contributes whenever time permits. Between columns, he can occasionally be found on Twitter.
I just... WOW. fuck these people. I think I found the most disgusting people on the Internet. At least I can see the point MRA or SJW but these fucker can burn in hell all I care.The Jovian said:Donovan is a sexist son of a ***** who objectifies women by keeping them on their toes, their backs, and their knees where they belong. He contributes whenever time permits. Between columns, he can occasionally be found on Twitter.
I'm pretty sure Finn will get his time to shine in the upcoming episodes, he seemed like the audience surrogate in this film.THM said:I have to say that the charge of Raye being a Mary Sue (at least partially) is something I agree with - but NOT because of the reasons RoK bring up. She did seem to 'get' the Force unrealistically quickly, not to mention how she was suddenly so good with a lightsabre. I don't, however, think of Finn as 'beta' or useless - he's just someone that left everything he's based his life on, and is flailing around trying to find something else - 'course he's gonna be useless compared to people who know what they're doing.
I wish that were the case, but MGTOWs go a few steps further by insisting that women are conspiring against men and exist only to steal their money in a divorce. I can see why a guy being screwed over by his ex would refrain from future relationships, but when they accuse all women of being one thing or another that's just madness. It's like with feminists, it's fine if you are hesitant around men because of past experiences but when you go on to insist that all men are terrible then as far as I'm concerned, you're the terrible one.Corey Schaff said:Wait, doesn't MGTOW just mean you're not interested in entering a relationship?
I mean, I'm perfectly fine on my own; it'd be nice to have someone to go on dates with but I don't really have a desire to seek out intimate relationships. I don't think that means I hate women <_<
The other major problem they (like their feminist brethren) have is that hooting dickholes, political extremists and deeply sexist shitheads keep hijacking their respective causes, usually to then detriment of meaningful dialogue with each other or legitimate bodies of law and government.undeadsuitor said:MRA stands for men's rights activists. I think they recently rebranded to meninists though. They usually have good intentions, though they can be shortsighted, and usually resort to blaming feminists for their issues without looking at the larger picture.Buckets said:Sorry to be ignorant, but what is MRA? As for making it lose 4.2 million, pretty sure Disney won't be quaking over that amount.
People's mental health needs work, and I don't trust or like people who try to separate issues like that by gender.Gordon_4 said:The other major problem they (like their feminist brethren) have is that hooting dickholes, political extremists and deeply sexist shitheads keep hijacking their respective causes, usually to then detriment of meaningful dialogue with each other or legitimate bodies of law and government.undeadsuitor said:MRA stands for men's rights activists. I think they recently rebranded to meninists though. They usually have good intentions, though they can be shortsighted, and usually resort to blaming feminists for their issues without looking at the larger picture.Buckets said:Sorry to be ignorant, but what is MRA? As for making it lose 4.2 million, pretty sure Disney won't be quaking over that amount.
There's meaningful work to be done by such groups, men's mental and physical health is one area we need some great strides in. And pissants like this are gloating about taking a stand by not seeing Star Wars. Fuck these wankers.
It is short for Mens Right Activist. While on paper there is value to be had, these kinds of group are normally insane. Even though Return of Kings( Or whatever their name is) says they dislike MRAs, they're are a great example of what to expect.Buckets said:Sorry to be ignorant, but what is MRA? As for making it lose 4.2 million, pretty sure Disney won't be quaking over that amount.
Isn't this like saying Marxists claim they hate Liberals, but they're a great example of what to expect?Blinktv said:Even though Return of Kings( Or whatever their name is) says they dislike MRAs, they're are a great example of what to expect.
No, it's like saying you don't take their analysis of themselves at face value. Critical Thinking 101Zontar said:Isn't this like saying Marxists claim they hate Liberals, but they're a great example of what to expect?Blinktv said:Even though Return of Kings( Or whatever their name is) says they dislike MRAs, they're are a great example of what to expect.
Honestly, by this point, I've come to the conclusion that if they are mentioned in the news as having said something, be it meaningful or not, they are likely the above. The ones who actually are providing that meaningful discourse and changes are actually out doing something, not courting the internet news machine.Gordon_4 said:The other major problem they (like their feminist brethren) have is that hooting dickholes, political extremists and deeply sexist shitheads keep hijacking their respective causes, usually to then detriment of meaningful dialogue with each other or legitimate bodies of law and government.undeadsuitor said:MRA stands for men's rights activists. I think they recently rebranded to meninists though. They usually have good intentions, though they can be shortsighted, and usually resort to blaming feminists for their issues without looking at the larger picture.Buckets said:Sorry to be ignorant, but what is MRA? As for making it lose 4.2 million, pretty sure Disney won't be quaking over that amount.
There's meaningful work to be done by such groups, men's mental and physical health is one area we need some great strides in. And pissants like this are gloating about taking a stand by not seeing Star Wars. Fuck these wankers.
This will better help you understand why so many are opposed to MRA's:Buckets said:Sorry to be ignorant, but what is MRA? As for making it lose 4.2 million, pretty sure Disney won't be quaking over that amount.
Pretty much. One of the very first articles on their page is literally "10 things my dog taught me about women".Zontar said:Isn't this like saying Marxists claim they hate Liberals, but they're a great example of what to expect?Blinktv said:Even though Return of Kings( Or whatever their name is) says they dislike MRAs, they're are a great example of what to expect.
why do I feel like this site should call itself Poeslaw.comBlinktv said:Pretty much. One of the very first articles on their page is literally "10 things my dog taught me about women".Zontar said:Isn't this like saying Marxists claim they hate Liberals, but they're a great example of what to expect?Blinktv said:Even though Return of Kings( Or whatever their name is) says they dislike MRAs, they're are a great example of what to expect.
Believe me I want this website to be a huge parody of misogynistic behavior but I really doubt it's the case, if it were they would've tried to be a little more funny than this. Also if you scroll down to the comment section of their articles you'll see so much politically incorrect, anti-semitic and sometimes downright racist behavior (I think I saw a couple of N-words in there somewhere) that it's impossible to think of this website as anything but 100% serious about the things it's saying.tf2godz said:why do I feel like this site should call itself Poeslaw.com
At the same time, no reasonable person would earnestly say that Stalin wasn't a bad guy because he wasn't Hitler.thaluikhain said:How did they know it was 4.2, not 4.1 or 4.3?
And yeah, echoing Zontar, they openly state that they are not part of the MRM. They may look much the same to outsiders, and in many ways they were, but that's like saying Hitler and Stalin were the same.
(Before anyone says it, I don't expect Return of Kings to annex bits of Poland or anything, just using those two are examples of mutually hostile ideologies that seem similar)
stop reading them you're giving them money with your clicks.The Jovian said:Believe me I want this website to be a huge parody of misogynistic behavior but I really doubt it's the case, if it were they would've tried to be a little more funny than this. Also if you scroll down to the comment section of their articles you'll see so much politically incorrect, anti-semitic and sometimes downright racist behavior (I think I saw a couple of N-words in there somewhere) that it's impossible to think of this website as anything but 100% serious about the things it's saying.tf2godz said:why do I feel like this site should call itself Poeslaw.com