If these rumours are true Microsoft are not "patching it in" either, they are integrating it into a new piece of hardware.versoth said:I think you, and everyone else who's quoted my comment, has missed the point.J Tyran said:Of course they could, in developed countries at least. Link the engine management system with a basic mobile network receiver, check the methods of vehicle registration available corporately and then wipe the immobiliser key if the owner appears to change.versoth said:It's because you cant patch an extortionist killswitch into a car, dumbass.
Or they could simply continue to build cars with specific tools only available to people that the auto makers approves of and refuse to service them if the owner changes. Lack of service history and being unable to get them repaired by reputable mechanics would make mean people wouldn't buy them used.
Cant needs to be replaced by wont because the car manufacturers are not stupid enough to do it because they know people wouldn't buy them in the first place. The technology to equip a kill switch certainly exists though.
It's not about "can they make a car with this technology and sell it"
It's that they can't retroactively add it to a car. Car companies cannot mandate that all cars currently in existence be fitted with this technology.
That's why I said "patch". Not "integrate into".