PhiMed said:
Yeah, I don't understand the appeal of The Expendables, either.
All the greatest action stars of the past 20 years, in one action movie, as a culmination/parody of all the big action movies of the 80's?
Yeah, that's much less interesting and appealing than ANOTHER MOVIE about a hipster douchbag chasing a "bi-curious" chick with crazy hair. Oh, and it's based on an incredibly obscure comic book. Because indie comics have huge mass appeal.
I'm not saying that these descriptions are the actual nature of these movies. I'm just saying that it's how they've been advertised. I'll probably see both of them, but if you're actually surprised that The Expendables made more money on opening weekend than Scott Pilgrim, you might want to schedule yourself for an appointment with a neurologist. Why, you ask? Well, if they realize that you're brain dead early enough, they may still be able to harvest your organs to save a life.
This is pretty much the reason I'm not going to see Scott Pilgrim. I knew absolutely nothing about it until just recently when people started talking up the movie, and it seems sort of interesting, but do I really want to go and see another awkward dude chasing the girl? Or would I rather see the action heroes I grew up with together in one film kicking arse? With a Jet Li fight scene, no less?
I'll try to see both, but The Expendables seems like the better choice from where I'm standing.
AgentNein said:
I resent you implying that I'm not a pompous elitist know-it-all though, these are badges I wear with pride.
So you're a teenager/uni student that thinks they're one of the few people that thinks for themselves? Where is that old picture of all those people on the train thinking the exact same thing again? I really should save that for future reference.
Also, you seem to have forgotten the vitally important parts from what you quoted. You know, the
horse's ass, dipshit, douchebag part of the title that goes with being a pompous, elitist know-it-all?