I'll go ahead and nip this in the butt a head of time. IF EvilRoy ends up being innocent, and not the Lawyer/Killer (Which is a BIG IF) I like DJ don't have a good defense for why actions. I am using the little bit of knowledge we have and previous experience to base my opinion on. I also have an Ace in the Sleeve I am saving for after ER is dead in case he wasn't the killer, I will share that once he dies. (As it implicates another, who I believe is working with ER) I don't want to reveal the information now though, because it may cause a split vote and allow Roy to live yet another round.Dying_Jester said:Just gonna say it now, I voted to...Kilroy...
Anyways, when did I become suspect? I mean, wow. Totally out of left field. Not saying don't vote for me, if it turns out that Roy ain't the killer. But be sure to kill Dema first.
Bloke seems more suspicious then I do. If it's not him then definitely go for me next because I have absolutely no defense.
I dunno! I just saw some people suggest it if Roy didn't die. If I remember right, think it was you I saw suggested I'm just too lazy to look back right now.Dying_Jester said:Just gonna say it now, I voted to...Kilroy...
Anyways, when did I become suspect? I mean, wow. Totally out of left field. Not saying don't vote for me, if it turns out that Roy ain't the killer. But be sure to kill Dema first.
Bloke seems more suspicious then I do. If it's not him then definitely go for me next because I have absolutely no defense.
Also, what's this about a banjumper? While I do sometimes look at other forum threads, this is the only one I post in or keep an eye on.
Also also, saying that you've got a role is incriminating in no way. Last round I had an incredibly important role(Priest) and made sure everyone knew I had a role, just to see if I would be offed.
It also seemed like a good defense as I had then explained. What kind of idiot would just tell everyone that they have a role? So why would the killer waste time on someone who might be lying about having a role? So on and so forth.
Crysan stated that he didn't vote for Roy, but also that he REGRETTED it, implying a high likelihood that he would vote for EvilRoy in the next round. I thought I had made that point.altnameJag said:Then Crysan doesn't vote for Roy and gets killed, and that implicates Roy for some reason?
Like I've mentioned, Whisper knowing about the video edit only implies that EITHER the killer or the lawyer was around for that round. So the killer could be someone newer, or the lawyer might be, or neither of them might be, so it doesn't exclude anyone from the list of suspects. If we were to catch the Lawyer and he hadn't been around for that round, we would know (with a very high degree of probability) that the Killer must have been, which would help exclude some people from suspicion. Until then, there's not much we can do with this information.I say we try and hunt down Whisper, see who's pulling the strings. They know about Beertent's video edit and the "Killer using someone else's account" thing. Probably been around the block a few times.
Says the person who wanted to kill the priest...Caramel Frappe said:.. I'm telling you guys, EvilRoy is probably innocent. Just watch *sips tea* and you'll all feel really bad for jumping in on em.
The proper response is to constantly remind Dema he was the worst killer in the history of the game.Caramel Frappe said:@Demagogue: That was a low blow dude. I already said 100x now I was sorry ... ... I only suspected king because he was so inactive and figured he was trying to slip away from attention. You're little comment just scored you negative points on my respect list.
I was actually thinking about a role like that... it would be AWESOME to try. I plan on making up some guidelines for it during the breakEvilRoy said:Welp, the thread is slowly sliding downwards into absolute bugfuck madness. I wish there was a role that exploded when executed, killing people who voted for them. THEN YOU ALL WOULD BE MORE CAREFUL.
When playing Werewolf with friends I remember a hunter role who gets to shoot someone when they die. Had a worst start ever where like 4 people died once. A witch killed someone, werewolf killed a hunter, hunter shot one of the lovers (entwined), so other lover died.Demagogue said:I was actually thinking about a role like that... it would be AWESOME to try. I plan on making up some guidelines for it during the breakEvilRoy said:Welp, the thread is slowly sliding downwards into absolute bugfuck madness. I wish there was a role that exploded when executed, killing people who voted for them. THEN YOU ALL WOULD BE MORE CAREFUL.
[HEADING=1]Vote Roy[footnote]I really should just make that my signature until the end of this voting... [/footnote]![/HEADING]
Why is he probably innocent despite the evidence though?Caramel Frappe said:.. I'm telling you guys, EvilRoy is probably innocent. Just watch *sips tea* and you'll all feel really bad for jumping in on em.
Eh why? It seems like a joke. He offered points that don't do anything and said as much.Caramel Frappe said:@Secondhand Revenant: I'm surprised you haven't commented on the GM wanting people to execute a certain person lol.
Umm.. you didn't actually answer SR's question Frappe... Why is Roy probably innocent despite the evidence?Caramel Frappe said:@Secondhand Revenant: I'm surprised you haven't commented on the GM wanting people to execute a certain person lol.
I've played a house-rule modified form of werewolf that included it and it was pretty interesting.Demagogue said:I was actually thinking about a role like that... it would be AWESOME to try. I plan on making up some guidelines for it during the breakEvilRoy said:Welp, the thread is slowly sliding downwards into absolute bugfuck madness. I wish there was a role that exploded when executed, killing people who voted for them. THEN YOU ALL WOULD BE MORE CAREFUL.![]()
>:[ stop that.[HEADING=1]Vote Roy[footnote]I really should just make that my signature until the end of this voting... [/footnote]![/HEADING]
Wait, what evidence? all I see is conjecture! and waffling!Demagogue said:Umm.. you didn't actually answer SR's question Frappe... Why is Roy probably innocent despite the evidence?Caramel Frappe said:@Secondhand Revenant: I'm surprised you haven't commented on the GM wanting people to execute a certain person lol.
It will be the pay off for the way he usually acts... he can act totally weird and it will just be the usualCaramel Frappe said:@Demagogue: .. Because there's nothing to say about it? If you guys are that set in executing Roy, what am I to say?
I even made a few posts responding to Secondhand in how I admire his evidence. I'm just saying Roy is likely innocent regardless. You're also annoying me- go back to reading the "How to be a Good Killer" handbook.
@Secondhand Revenant: I'd laugh so hard if he ends up being the Killer. The one dude sprouting poetic villainy and we ignored him- only to find out he's the culprit. Oh how hilarious and sad that would end up being.
Aww... poor annoyed Frappe.... you know, when you're taking your insult cues from the new guy they don't really hold the same bite. LOLCaramel Frappe said:@Demagogue: .. Because there's nothing to say about it? If you guys are that set in executing Roy, what am I to say?
I even made a few posts responding to Secondhand in how I admire his evidence. I'm just saying Roy is likely innocent regardless. You're also annoying me- go back to reading the "How to be a Good Killer" handbook.