retyopy said:
OmniscientOstrich said:
retyopy said:
OmniscientOstrich said:
retyopy said:
Right, so when an article comes up about a woman who was raped, I suppose I'll just post that picture. What? I'm a horrible person for saying that? Deal with it.
Firstly, men are not raped in nearly the same numbers as women. Secondly, that was totally fucking capricious and wildly extreme. I was merely saying that sexism against men really is practically a non-issue and that you and many others like you are making way too big of a deal out of something that occurs far more infrequently when compared to the figures of discrimination of literally every other minority there is. What the hell did any of that have to do with rape?
Sorry, I'm tired and I'm being an idiot. My brain is completely fried. I'm just auto-posting.
Don't sweat it, I admit the 'Deal with it' poster wasn't particularly mature of me either. Although I still stand by my point that sexism against men occurs far more infrequently than the inverse.
And I stand by my point that just because its on a smaller scale, it can't be ignored. But I see what you're coming from.
The truth is that people are nasty to each other regardless of gender and sexual orientation. That much is true.
However there is a big difference between a few adverts and tv shows portraying men as silly/incompetant and the fact that, as a man, you have less barriers in life dictating what you can and can't do - this includes societal pressures as to what your carreer should be and what you are good at. Studies have shown that it is still easier to get hired for a job (assuming qualifications, experience and skills are equal) if you are a man than a woman. The same goes for promotions.
Thats something to be concerned about. Certain industries are still very conservative and hire far more men than women. I never realised this until my wife, an architect graduate, started looking for work. She graduated with first class honours and only had about three or four better students from that graduating class of around 100. Now she still hasn't got a job in the industry. I know there is recession on but some of her fellow graduates have and they are pretty much all the guys.
I did not realise this until recently but architecture is very male-dominated. Some will argue that this is because more men study it - not true; equal amounts of men and women study and graduate in the field (at least in my country). Some may say that she doesn't interview well - but she doesn't even get to the interview stages of the jobs she applies for. You could say that her CV/portfolio isn't up to scratch but her friends all compared each others (worked on them together) and her's was used as a model example by most of them. The thing is; the guys got interviewed but the girls didn't. This even includes former classmates of her's who failed courses and had to repeat semesters.
Now that sounds like and anecdotal piece of information so I did a bit of digging into the employment stats (I don't have them onhand) and found that architecture is consistently like this in many other countries. Other industries also tend to show this bias. A bias, not against the unskilled and untalented, but against those without a penis.
So until that kind of shit goes away there is always a place for feminists. A couple of humourous charecterisations of men is hardly comparable to barriers to employment (and don't get me started on how people pressure women to work in certain areas because they are easier for when its time to "start a family").