SEXISM! What's with the standards?

Recommended Videos

s0p0g

New member
Aug 24, 2009
807
0
0
Revnak said:
s0p0g said:
blahdeblah
Took you guys long enough. I was expecting a link to one of that man's videos ages ago. Not that I watch them or anything, I just know he's absurdly vocal about this and that people love to put his videos in threads about sexism. The one's I've seen come off as pretty strawman-based. They're also a fine example of the problem I brought up in my first post.
sorry man, didn't get here earlier xD

let's just hope that both women like those mentioned, as well as sexual offenders (both men and women - what? yes, it goes both ways, unfortunately), won't a problem anymore, someday :)
 

Revnak_v1legacy

Fixed by "Monday"
Mar 28, 2010
1,979
0
0
irishda said:
Revnak said:
irishda said:
Revnak said:
irishda said:
Ah, the old sexism threads here in the gaming community. A lot of Escapist users are closeted chauvinists who think women receiving preferential treatment sometimes means men don't still enjoy every life opportunity, and that if there is one bad case of harassment (which very clearly there's something you're not telling us cause no way does a situation like that not even get appealed) it means the whole system has to be scrapped.
I'm going to try and stop a pointless argument before it occurs, but no, I am not a closet misogynist. Most escapists are as much of closet misogynists as feminists are closet misandrists (which the spell checker thinks isn't a word. Now that is a double standard right there), which is to say, hardly at all. People here tend to think sexism is bad, they just like arguing over who's sexism is worse or more important, just like you are right now. Sexism is bad, all of it. This includes sexism favoring women over men. Just because it happens less often (wrong, but I'll give you that because I have no desire to start such a pointless argument) or is of a different nature does not mean that sexism against men is unimportant. Stereotypes that hold Asians to be super smart are just as bad as stereotypes that hold African Americans to be uneducated. Both are harmful, and therefore both should be stopped. I have no patience for people who want to moan and groan about how much worse they have it than other people who have it terrible, or those who would defend them. Both are blatantly wrong.
We'll argue about the gaming community and the prevalence of misogyny in another thread. And sexism is bad. Although I will take issue with this idea that men have it terrible because of anecdotal evidence from a few people, especially since the anecdote itself is suspect. These threads keep coming up where men are trying to paint themselves as victims of a society that apparently tramples on men when this couldn't be farther from the truth.
There's evidence out there, such as custody statistics, abuse statistics, statistics on the portrayal of rape and domestic abuse in media, what have you. This guy just didn't link to it. And yeah, men aren't worse off, but they certainly aren't in the world's best situation, just a different one. The white heterosexual male certainly isn't the great victim of modern society, but they're still a victim just like everybody else.
That's the thing though, we really aren't victims in a large, epidemic sense. Yes, men are victims of rape and assault, but these threads where we piss and moan about "how stacked the deck is against us" or "how bad life is for a man", it really trivializes all of the men on women violence that's historically been fairly one-sided. It's the equivalent of telling poor people how ridiculously hard it is to live on $500,000 in New York City. Yeah, it's sort of true, but, big picture, it's really not something that should be at the front of society's attention. I don't think we have to worry about a horrifying matriarchal society that keeps men for breeding and then kills them just yet.

men aren't worse off, but they certainly aren't in the world's best situation
We are though. That's the thing. White, heterosexual men definitely enjoy all the benefits of society. There's absolutely no downside or fear of being discrimination if you're a white, heterosexual male. Louis CK nailed it perfectly, where a white, heterosexual man could travel to any point in the past, absolutely any, and we would be at the top of the totem pole.
Meh, I don't see things as a strict hierarchy. I see things as roles that certain people are forced or expected to adhere to. It sucks to be a WHM (shortened) because you are forced to adhere to something you may not be. I am not very masculine. I am not fond of fighting. I hate sports. I don't want to work in business. I'm very emotional. I am somewhat bisexual (emphasis on the somewhat) and not ashamed to admit that some men are quite handsome. I like giving hugs. I am absurdly affectionate. These are all things that as a WHM I am not supposed to do that limit my ability to be myself. Objectively it may not seem that bad, but I still see it as a problem. Also, those who ruled within certain geographic locations have been WHM, while the vast majority of WHM have not been rulers. And I dare you to be a WHM in certain urban areas today and try to boss people around. Not the whole city, just a specific lower-class neighborhood.
 

Revnak_v1legacy

Fixed by "Monday"
Mar 28, 2010
1,979
0
0
s0p0g said:
Revnak said:
s0p0g said:
blahdeblah
Took you guys long enough. I was expecting a link to one of that man's videos ages ago. Not that I watch them or anything, I just know he's absurdly vocal about this and that people love to put his videos in threads about sexism. The one's I've seen come off as pretty strawman-based. They're also a fine example of the problem I brought up in my first post.
sorry man, didn't get here earlier xD

let's just hope that both women like those mentioned, as well as sexual offenders (both men and women - what? yes, it goes both ways, unfortunately), won't a problem anymore, someday :)
We can all dream I suppose. I certainly do at least.
 

JediMB

New member
Oct 25, 2008
3,094
0
0
Yes, sexism goes both* ways.

Yes, it's bad.

Yes, the chain of events you describe sounds terrible and terribly unfair.


---
*Not taking non-binary sexes into account.
 

Radelaide

New member
May 15, 2008
2,503
0
0
DevilWithaHalo said:
I'm somewhat skeptical regarding your anecdotal story. Even in a country with outlandishly frivolous lawsuits, that one sounds a bit far fetched. Especially considering a group of witnesses who could have testified on his behalf. Something seems amiss.

You'll get no argument from me regarding the various double standards the genders have to face in various facets of their lives. But I'd like to know more about your friends situation.
Not really. Honestly, I hate it when women call sexual harassment for stuff like that. It makes the rest of us look bad. It's the same with women who have sex with a guy then claim he raped her because she regrets it. Some women are fucking psychos and they make a bad case for the rest of the sex when we actually have a legitimate claim.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
Revnak said:
Took you guys long enough. I was expecting a link to one of that man's videos ages ago. Not that I watch them or anything, I just know he's absurdly vocal about this and that people love to put his videos in threads about sexism. The one's I've seen come off as pretty strawman-based. They're also a fine example of the problem I brought up in my first post.
Yeah, I wasn't that much of a fan of his even before he decided it'd be fun to tell rape victims he hopes they drown in rape semen.
 

Revnak_v1legacy

Fixed by "Monday"
Mar 28, 2010
1,979
0
0
Mortai Gravesend said:
Revnak said:
Mortai Gravesend said:
Revnak said:
Mortai Gravesend said:
XandNobody said:
Mortai Gravesend said:
Darius Brogan said:
Mortai Gravesend said:
Darius Brogan said:
Mortai Gravesend said:
Darius Brogan said:
Mortai Gravesend said:
Darius Brogan said:
While we're on this topic, why is it that any MALE claiming sexual harassment is pretty much told to man-up and quit being a fucking pussy?
Yes, because everyone besides you is some faceless group that is just unfathomably inconsistent. How about the people who tell them to man up etc are sexists and not necessarily people who really care about equality? The people that say that kind of shit about manning up and people being pussies tend to be obnoxious, overly macho, and pretty clearly sexist.
What do you mean 'everyone besides me'?
I'm talking about how you're treating all the other attitudes you find in people as if they're supposed to be consistent with each other.
It's a prevalent mentality shared by a vast majority of the male and female genders, a number of whom have already exhibited, in my presence, their distaste for gender inequality.

Contradictions about in this society, and while they no longer surprise me at all, I'm still quite entitled to be curious as to why they've yet to die out.
Prevalent? Your evidence is what, your personal experience?
My evidence is the personal experience of everyone I've ever met, and likely everyone anyone on the planet has ever met.

Sexism has become so ingrained into society that small forms and hints are constantly used by almost every living human on the planet, except those paranoid enough to moderate every single facet of their speech at all times in which they are in contact with any other human being alive.

My personal experience is astoundingly large, yes, but that's only because of how many times I've moved to different places in the last twenty years.
Oh hah, okay so you're just BSing this, now trying to pretend you can cite people you haven't met. Well the only group you can speak for, namely the people you've met, are insufficient. There's a reason they conduct studies instead of pulling some random know-it-all and asking about his personal experiences. No matter how much he's moved around and how large he thinks it is.

And yeah, there's a lot of it. Which of course doesn't justify that nonsense where you talk as if there's a double standard in your OP. Maybe some, but really the kind of talk you cited sure doesn't sound like it comes from anyone I know who claims in any serious way to be against sexism.
Calling someone out on not citing sources while, not citing sources.

Can't tell if trolling or not...
I don't recall making any claims that require sources. I didn't say whether it was as endemic as he seems to believe or not. So if you want to talk about trolling talking about me not citing sources when I've made no particular claims like he has seems like a great start.

I mean, don't get me wrong, his experiences have had no more supporting evidence than 'I met a guy' and are so based on the availability heuristic it makes my mind hurt, but there is no reason to get so hostile about him not being able to cite them when you don't either.
I'm not contesting that he's wrong. I'm saying his position lacks any serious support. He's jumping to conclusions about society as a whole and I'm calling him out on that.
Dude, you are on a web forum. You are not in a social sciences class. You are not at a university.
I don't care.

Personal experience is totally valid when people are making arguments, they just aren't in any way scientific.
Ah yes the logical principle of "I can say whatever I want is valid without any reasoning". Oh wait no. It's not valid when trying to prove a bigger rule. It's pathetically weak. If it isn't scientific it isn't really valid.

Sure, he is applying a small sample to a massive whole, but that doesn't mean he is in some way right.
Exactly, it doesn't mean he is in some way right. It makes little to no suggestion of him being right. Good typo there.

Both science and personal experience are part of the same epistemology for fuck's sake (empiricism). In the end science is just a somewhat less biased form of the same argument as what the OP is using. Notice also that you're the one that's adding nothing to the discussion by simply throwing in needless skepticism (a pet peeve of mine).
Needless? Ah yes, because you like his conclusion. Or is there some reason to call it needless? And bias is important. If I go and meet some random guy who says he's a sexist does it now mean that I can use that in any meaningful way for an argument that all guys are sexist? No. Horrible support for the position and not valid in the least.

Also, why the fuck do I need to add to this? If it's based on a flawed premise in the first place, don't fucking whine about not adding. Fix the premise first, then whine if people don't add. That's as stupid as complaining I point out someone is doing a math problem all wrong because I'm not adding anything! It's worthless unless we start out with a good basis. There is none.
I am going to try to not be angry here, just gonna throw that out there right now. I'm really gonna try.

Why are you commenting if you just want to inform him that personal experience is inherently biased, and why did you never tell him that is why you are replying to him. Look back at your posts, you never said you wanted scientific research to back this up, you just kept telling him how he had to be utterly wrong for relying on personal experience. For fuck's sake, I was the onhe who had to point that out to him for you! If you really wanted to know about this in some less biased way, how difficult would it have been to either ask for that, or to look it up yourself? Seriously, when I want a less biased report for something, I go ahead and look for one or at the very least I'd ask for one, not ***** and moan about how the OP is biased or something stupid like that.
Why the fuck does it matter why I'm commenting?

I also didn't say he had to be utterly wrong.

I'm also not interested in looking up any reports, I'm pointing out his reasoning is flawed. Stop whining and accept that.


And the typo thing, that was pretty jerkish right there. My point was that personal experience can be valid. It is certainly a steep better than relying on entirely baseless assumptions, and is essentially science at a smaller, less intentional scale, a point of mine you completely ignored. Personal experience is not automatically invalid, it just isn't always valid. And that is the pointless skepticism I was talking about, discrediting any argument unless it is absolutely valid. It pisses me of in philosophy class and it pisses me off here.
It's valid to prove the existence of something, nothing on the scale of what he is saying. And a step better is worthless in and of itself. Better to say nothing at all in this case.

It isn't even close to valid. You'd have a point if it was. It isn't pointless skepticism. I am not discrediting it because it isn't absolutely valid. I'm discrediting it because it isn't even close.

Your math analogy is wrong too. You can't help someone get better at math by just telling them they're doing it wrong, you have to tell them how to do it right.
It fits perfectly. You can't correct them until they admit they're doing it wrong. If they persist they can't be helped until they stop.
How can you expect someone to admit they're doing it wrong when you haven't told them how to do it right. You were being needlessly obtuse throughout all your earlier comments.

Also, back to the personal experience thing, one does not have to conduct massive studies to make judgments about society. There are many things we can know about society just by spending a moment actually thinking about things. It really isn't that difficult to make judgments about society. Nobody did any studies to conclude the existence of labeling theory, but it explains so much and fits so well that we use it all the time today. Things like norms and values were understood to exist not because they were proven to through a scientific study, but because they so obviously did. In fact, most norms and values can validly be understood through personal experience alone. I think personal experience can be valid when it comes to understanding society, it just isn't the most valid way to understand it.
 

Revnak_v1legacy

Fixed by "Monday"
Mar 28, 2010
1,979
0
0
thaluikhain said:
Revnak said:
Took you guys long enough. I was expecting a link to one of that man's videos ages ago. Not that I watch them or anything, I just know he's absurdly vocal about this and that people love to put his videos in threads about sexism. The one's I've seen come off as pretty strawman-based. They're also a fine example of the problem I brought up in my first post.
Yeah, I wasn't that much of a fan of his even before he decided it'd be fun to tell rape victims he hopes they drown in rape semen.
Didn't need to watch more than one of his videos to find out he'd eventually make a fool of himself with something like that. Obvious moron is obvious.
 

Vrex360

Badass Alien
Mar 2, 2009
8,379
0
0
While I admit that is an unpleasant story I can assure you that for every one example of that happening there are at least three where a woman has been sexually harrassed and will never recieve compensation nor will her harrasser ever get punished. Just like how very few rapes ever actually go so much as reported, fewer then that eve get to court and fewer of those ever result in imprisoning.
In fact a woman who gets raped or harrassed sexually is more often then not going to be accused of lying or essentially told that she brought it on herself for being slutty. Their names get dragged through the dirt and their reputation gets soiled. That's why I hate it when people try to argue that 'oh women stage rapes all the time, it's a way they have power over men' because like, seriously?
They are going to get their name dragged through the dirt, their reputation permenantly damaged and are going to feel the shame and burden of it everywhere they go. I can't really think of that many people who would intentionally put themselves through that for petty revenge.
I'm not saying it doesn't happen but honestly I can't see a reason to believe it's anywhere near the epidemic levels that the MRA, Spearhead and False Rape Society (or as I call them the Misogyny Justice League) would have you believe.

I guess what I'm saying is not to talk down what happened here OP but you seem to be saying that what happened is a typical response, in reality it really isn't or at least there is an equal chance of a woman actually being sexually harrassed in a major way but the person who did it never getting so much as a slap on the wrist.
I think you do bring up some valid points, mind, but in general I don't think we are really at the point where us males are the oppressed ones.


s0p0g said:
also, this sums it up quite nicely:
Ahhh yes, the guy who told a rape victim that she deserved it, that the guy who raped her should get a medal and that she should drown in 'rape semen' and then ended by demanding that she relive the trauma of the rape because she* dared to argue with him on Reddit.
Yes he's totally a fair and justified person to ever talk about things like gender politics and sexism and women's rights. My god I can't believe people still quote or reference this insurmountible misogynist shithead.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2012/02/08/the-not-so-amazing-atheist-self-immolates/


*was actually a man who had been raped by a woman.

I also like how he doesn't mention that on the facebook fan page in question for every one comment by a woman calling it 'empowering' there were like ten comments by men saying how awesome it was and wishing it would happen to them. Or that apart from the one, albeit awful, example on video he's found there really aren't that many others and the one in question was still met with vicious hostility and backlash by male and female members of the public. It would be valid if a shitstorm of some kind didn't appear, but a controversy most certainly did rise. Just like it would if the genders are reversed.

Frankly unless he's willing to trade places with the girl from Romania who got kidnapped and sold off as a sex worker in the U.K for a few years or the High School Cheerleader who got expelled from the cheerleading squad and forced to pay a compensation for not clapping the guy who raped her, or the many female writers and bloggers who constantly recieve graphic rape and death threats (complete with leaving their home addresses in the threats) whenever they dare question certain societal things resulting them being forced to move house, he has no fucking right to talk about how he can't take feminism seriously.
No one should take him seriously.

God I should stop now before I lose my mind but the point is he is a disgusting loathsome little turd of a human being. Once I would have just called him a fucking idiot who does no research on the topics he talks about and then angrily shouts out his arguments like a chimp while also offering up rip offs and scams claiming that he's making new sites.


But after that whole Reddit issue I have to consider him much worse. The most loathsome and gross little creep I've ever seen on the internet. I don't want to see him hurt or dead for saying it, what I want is his reputation permenantly scarred and that maybe people will stop using him as a bloody source on topics he clearly knows nothing about.

If you want to argue against feminism or debate issues of sexism towards men, fine. Just don't use this idiot, please.
 

dobahci

New member
Jan 25, 2012
148
0
0
s0p0g said:
also, this sums it up quite nicely:
I am ethically obligated to inform you that the same guy who made that video also said the following to a rape survivor on reddit:

"Yeah. Well, you deserved it. So, fuck you. I hope it happens again soon. I'm tired of being treated like shit by you mean little cunts and then you using your rape as an excuse. Fuck you. I think we should give the guy who raped you a medal. I hope you fucking drown in rape semen, you ugly, mean-spirited cow. Actually, I don't believe you were ever raped! What man would be tasteless enough to stick his dick into a human cesspool like you? Nice gif of a turd going into my mouth. Is that kind of like the way that rapists dick went in your pussy? Or did he use your asshole? Or was it both? Maybe you should think about it really hard for the next few hours. Relive it as much as possible. You know? Try to recall: was it my pussy or my ass?"

Also, a couple points for people who are still bothering to read new posts here:

1) You're not doing your side (or yourself, or anyone else) any favors by being hostile and adversarial about everything. Make your point and then move the fuck on, like a civilized adult. Sometimes I wish I could be Moderator Of The Internet so I could enforce this rule everywhere, but no doubt I'd receive complaints from people saying that I'm oppressing their right to act like a four-year-old throwing a tantrum.

2) No one would deny that there are indeed some men who have been treated unfairly by women (or by the system), and it's important to recognize that feminists are not cheering when this happens. Unless you're pulling the extremist feminists and basing everything upon them -- and they're just about as representative of mainstream feminism as the Westboro Baptist Church is of Christianity -- feminists are not working to oppress men.

You see, the question that they're primarily interested in is not "How are women being treated unfairly by men?" or "how are men being treated unfairly by women?", but rather, "How do gender stereotypes (or gender itself, as a construct) create a culture in which both genders are treated unfairly, and what can we do about it?"
 

AngloDoom

New member
Aug 2, 2008
2,461
0
0
thaluikhain said:
Now, we've been over this dozens of times in the times I've been on this forum, and I know it's unlikely anyone who doesn't already know this, but:

There is not some grand conspiracy by women in general or feminists in particular to ruin men's lives for the lulz. Men aren't being dominated or oppressed by women or whatever.

Yes, there are instances when gender bias works against men, but that's because you can't have a massive gender bias such as our society has and have it work for the benefit of one gender all the time.

Women being seen as victims more then men is because society tells us that men are big and powerful and women are small and useless. It's the inevitable result of that kind of thinking, and something feminists have been trying to erase, not shore up, for decades. Society can't just say that men are dominant without then assuming they are, and that's inevitably going to lead to problems.

Well, women are also seen as victims more than men because women are much more likely to be assaulted by men than the other way around, but again, that's because society says it's the way things are/should be.
Quoted for truth.

After women were subjected to essentially patriarchal rule for hundreds of years and only very recently had the plea for equality taken seriously, it's unsurprising that many people just assume that in a confrontation between a man and a woman that the man is in the wrong. It's not at all the right attitude because, unfortunately, far too many women seem to know this (or at least subconsciously recognise with)and realise they can get away with things that men simply cannot do. Hell, if I see a man and a woman in a fight on the street, I'd very likely imagine the man to be in the wrong if it wasn't for the fact that my male friend was the victim of domestic abuse.

It's a big cultural problem, and one we are not going to get around by pointing fingers at each side. Men's treatment of women (in general) is just as much the cause for 'psycho women' as the behaviour of (as a sweeping statement) the crazy women themselves. We need to stop all this 'don't hit a woman' and 'men can't cry' crap, and soon. I'm sick of being told by women to 'go punch him in the face' and told by men 'what are you getting upset about?'
 

Murlin

I came here to laugh at you
Jul 15, 2009
535
0
0
Equality is hard to actually achieve, not just in sexism. The reason why it's an issue wich needs to be adressed isn't so much that Women on average suffer, it's that the whole goddamn system makes as much sense as previous systems of discrimination.

I find it strange that Women CANNOT legally rape a man, since rape is only "official" when the offender penetrates the victim, which isn't entirely the case when a woman ties you up and f*cks the living shit out of you
 

Hazmattuxedo2404

New member
Aug 30, 2011
14
0
0
Ultimately I think this comes down to society?s perception of both sexes, as time goes on society will (hopefully) adapt. I think this really stems from the opinion that all men want is sex. It?s a myth that is perpetuated by both men and women. Though sex is a central theme of the human contusion it should not be seen as a man's sole desire. When this misconception is rectified great leaps in equality for BOTH sexes can be made. to be fair the empowerment of women is not in fact the poor treatment of a man, the empowerment of women (which to be fair is 99%) do is act like a good person. Same goes for men.
 

mrhappy1489

New member
May 12, 2011
499
0
0
Matthew94 said:
Although your story is a bit far fetched I do notice a tendency to side with women or give preferential treatment in the name of "equality" and "just because" or [insert BS reason here].

Just look at things like divorces, child custody, domestic violence or our schooling systems to see it in action.
Some of the things that you have mentioned there are true under certain circumstances, but domestic violence should not be there. Domestic violence at least here in Australia is perpetrated by men in at least 90% of the cases. It is a ridiculously skewed number, but it is completely true. While it may be possible that some men just don't report the incidences to the authorities, women are still the main victims here. Never should there be any sort of doubt on the topic and you should rightly remove it from future arguments
 

tthor

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,931
0
0
Phasmal said:
Darius Brogan said:
UUUUUUUGGHHHHHHHH

Apparently this needs saying, because we are all five. There are terrible PEOPLE. Some PEOPLE are terrible. Yes?

It is very hard for legitimate victims of sexual assault/harrassment at work to get recognised, and stupid statements like `Women expect X` dont HELP anyone.
Women are not one being.
Women are not all out for money at work.
Some PEOPLE are out for money at work.
And terrible WOMEN are not TERRIBLE BECAUSE THEY ARE WOMEN.
Yes, it sucks that she was believed, I'm really suprised the dude couldn't appeal.

Being a woman on this forum is getting fucking tiring.


As other people have said, it does sound like your friend could be leaving things out.
Can we just get over this, gaming community?
Because I'm getting worried about you.
I think you seriously misconstrued some of what he was saying o_O..
 

AngloDoom

New member
Aug 2, 2008
2,461
0
0
mrhappy1489 said:
Matthew94 said:
Although your story is a bit far fetched I do notice a tendency to side with women or give preferential treatment in the name of "equality" and "just because" or [insert BS reason here].

Just look at things like divorces, child custody, domestic violence or our schooling systems to see it in action.
Some of the things that you have mentioned there are true under certain circumstances, but domestic violence should not be there. Domestic violence at least here in Australia is perpetrated by men in at least 90% of the cases. It is a ridiculously skewed number, but it is completely true. While it may be possible that some men just don't report the incidences to the authorities, women are still the main victims here. Never should there be any sort of doubt on the topic and you should rightly remove it from future arguments
Anecdotal as it is, with the exception of one couple, I've only ever seen women hit men. The difference is none of the men reported it, while the woman who was hit did report it. I myself have been hit by three different women in the past, and each one I grabbed and restrained for doing it. Every single one reacted as if it was the first time it had happened to them before.

This is in no way saying that I stand as some definite proof on the subject, but you can't simply dismiss the an argument with 'there should be no doubt' on something as private as domestic violence. The men I've seen who have tried to talk about the fact that their girlfriend/finance/whatever is hitting them got opening mocked or ignored, and when one of them retaliated by grabbing his girlfriend's arm, he lost a significant amount of his friends and then his male friends who were accustomed to seeing his girlfriend beat him on a regular basis. It wasn't a secret, and yet he was still more in the wrong than her.

I'm just saying, there is a lot of doubt when it comes to this subject, in some people's minds.