Sexual Fantasy vs. Sexual Morality

[ThreeWords]

What people do behind closed doors is no concern of mine, and it should be of no concern to anyone else.

This.

I add that what I do behind closed doors is no concern of anyone else, and it should be of no concern to you either.

 

[klaynexas3]

no, what happens behind close doors is none of my concern. as long as no one involved is being forced into it, it shouldn't matter. the internet has the right(while disturbing) idea one this. rule 34 has no exceptions, so why should we?

 

[CarpathianMuffin]

As long as it's consensual, not underage or with animals, and behind closed doors, I don't mind what somebody does. I mean hell, I'm the last person who can judge.

 

[mindlesspuppet]

What does sexual realignment surgery have to do with anything, might I ask?

Doctor, I'm not very happy with my anatomy, I think my penis has begun to sag. xD

To undergo this surgery you need to be cleared by a psychiatrist first. It's not as simple as saying 'doctor doctor'. And that still doesn't answer my question, what on earth do you think sexual realignment surgery has to do with sexuality?

It's sexual reassignment surgery, not realignment, my post was poking fun at your incorrect wording.

 

[Sion_Barzahd]

There should definately be some kind of line that is drawn as far as sexual morals are concerned, but as long as you're not commiting an act which is illegal in some way i.e. rape or sexing up a child, then i don't really see the problem.
I bet many escapists here have sexual sins they've commited in their time, i know i have. but like many of us have said already, what goes on behind closed doors is no business of ours.

 

[game-lover]

People can do whatever the hell they please in the bedroom. As long as they keep it there.

If people are gonna be all exhibitionist and do it in a public place however, I say that makes it my business. And they shouldn't complain if a) they get some kind of judgement from others or b) they get their private deets spread across the land.

I still vow that if I ever see people having sex in public 'cause they like the thrill of maybe getting caught, I just might help them all out and watch. Since obviously there's a little exhibitionism under the surface.

Plus as long as it's legal and consensual and the rest of the important stuff.

 

[Kakashi on crack]

There's lots of stuff I could care less about... Some things there should be a boundry though, for instance rape, incest, and necrophillia, that crap is just going too far.

 

[GoldenEyedScout]

Everybody has their own weird sexual fantasies.

So long as nobody is hurt physically(unless they're into that) or emotionally, the only line
that needs to be drawn is pretty obvious, but I believe we already have laws in place to deal with pedophillia and necrophilia.

 

[Programmed_For_Damage]

What consenting couples do in their private time is of no concern to me.
What does concern me is the oversaturation of sex in society which drives some people to have to (or believe they have to) do more "extreme" stuff to each other just to get off. I'm starting to think "Stinkfist" by Tool may have been more than just a great song; it may have been prophetic.

 

[Roxor]

For someone with a mindset like mine, the whole matter is irrelevant. I'm just simply not interested.

 

[ThreeWords]

What people do behind closed doors is no concern of mine, and it should be of no concern to anyone else.

This.

I add that what I do behind closed doors is no concern of anyone else, and it should be of no concern to you either.

Does that mean I should stop watching then? ;p

No, your tickets are still valid till the end of March

 

[Aurgelmir]

What people do behind closed doors is no concern of mine, and it should be of no concern to anyone else.

I want to agree with that with a little appendix:

"As long as no one gets hurt."

Or else your statement think Pedophilia is accepted. Alternatively we can change it to this:

What consenting adults do behind closed doors is no concern of mine, and it should be of no concern to anyone else.

 

[DoW Lowen]

As it was put so graciously to me, there are only two rules to sex.

1) If there is grass on the wicket, it's time to play cricket
2) Rubber gags in a tent? It's all okay as long as there's consent.

 

[BonsaiK]

There was a time when the only real and acceptable form of sex would be your typical vanilla sex between a married man and woman that you see (if you're into voyeurism) in any king sized bed across the land. It's nice and fun and all, but with variety being the spice of life for whatever reason, it's quite obvious that the boundaries of what is sexually moral would get pushed over time, and that seems to have happened in recent times with a whole glut of examples, such as pornography, same-sex, gender-reassignment surgery, Unmarried (gasp.), sex competitions, and lest I say it, "deux femme, un coupe". At least some of these would scare off your average Joe or Jane, but with the intrinsic nature of sex being one that begs for newer and more intense experiences as good ol' vanilla sex may get a bit too...vanilla. Do you believe that we really should draw a line on what should be acceptable? Or what would be defined as acceptable to you anyway?

Pornography has been around since the first caveman got a piece of charcoal from the fire and drew a picture of a guy and a girl on a wall. Gay sex has been going on forever and even happens in the animal kingdom, and various sexual perversions that make 2girls1cup look tame were practiced in ancient Rome, Greece and many other societies. Nothing that's happening now is really new, the only thing that's changed is that the technology to document it has improved, so more people's eyes are now opening up to all sorts of things that were happening anyway, and have been for thousands of years.

I totally intended for this to be a more personal reflection rather than "What should everybody else do?"

Then you shouldn't have used the word "we" in the second last sentence of your OP, because that's created a lot of confusion. Asking if "we should draw a line" suggests that "we" as a community should draw a line, because otherwise what does "we" mean? If by "we" you meant "you, reading this right now" then you probably should have just typed "you".

What's acceptable to me, personally? Well I don't care about what others do, I'm only concerned about what I'm doing with the one that I'm with, and the answer to that is... nobody's goddamn business, but rest assured I'm enjoying it.

 

[Gigano]

Anyone who worries about what consenting adults do in privacy have too much time on their hands.

Nor do such bigots have any greater worth than they assign to anyone who engage in such harmless behaviour. If they condemn it or treat those who practise it ill, they should be condemned and treated ill in turn.

 

[fates_puppet13]

there are boundries
but people will be people
and hater gonna hate
alough i myself feel that as long as noone gets hurt (and that includes people whom are not directly involved) its ok
alough having said that i do have my dislike of casual sex
motly because its douchey behaviour but also because i think its disrespectful