Should Halo 4 be the last Halo?

Recommended Videos

Racecarlock

New member
Jul 10, 2010
2,497
0
0
Remember the Legendary ending in Halo 3? That was obviously a cliffhanger. The announcement trailer just shows chief escaping the in amber clad as it heads towards that mysterious object that was seen in the legendary ending. I'm hoping for a marathon crossover. You will recall that in marathon the humans had a planet size station and the transporting technology seen in halo 1 mission 343 guilty spark. I don't think that's a coincidence. Of course with 343 industries taking over, maybe that crossover is less likely, but nonetheless it would be cool as hell.
 

kittii-chan 300

New member
Feb 27, 2011
704
0
0
Knife-28 said:
Just to build on your idea a little, A game (Or two) set during the Spartans early missions/training would be an interesting take on the universe, heck, you could do a more stealth based game set before the Spartans got their MJOLNIR armour.
they need to make a game of what happened inside the portal thing at the end of the last book. i could play as kelly...
 

cthulhumythos

New member
Aug 28, 2009
637
0
0
Swifty714 said:
Their is my question. Should Halo 4 be the last halo. Has the series of games gone on too long? Bungie jumped on with Activision to probably start making another ONI, but will 343 studios be enough to continue the halo universe?
if you asked me i'd have said that halo: reach should've been the last.

i'm a halo fan, but even from the teaser i can tell 343 is doing it wrong. plus nothing screams "WE'RE MILKING THE CASH COW FOR ALL ITS GOT" when microsoft not only announced one game less than a year after the most recent one, they announced three.


suffice to say, i'm not optimistic. and kinda sad.
 

Jabberwock King

New member
Mar 27, 2011
320
0
0
Seeing as they've already announced it to be a trilogy, I'm assuming they've already planned out enough material for 3 games, though I could be overly optimistic about that. The steady rise of the number on the end is a little disconcerting for me, but I can look past that so long as they deliver the good stuff. I won't deny that Halo is a total cash-cow franchise, but I can ignore that so long as they add worthwhile stuff to it. And for FUCKS SAKE someone please shoehorn some space fighter missions into it!

crepesack said:
Rabid Chipmunk said:
Well, since Halo 4 is part of a new Halo trilogy, it better not fucking be the last Halo game, or it's going to end on an unresolved cliff-hanger.

As far as what SHOULD have been the last Halo game, I'd have to say it should've stopped at Halo 3, because IMO, no game has ever been as good after the third installment (e.g. I loved Spinter Cell, but the last two or huge disappointments).
ANNOUNCEMENT: New halo trilogy is a prequel trilogy detailing the angst filled childhood that led up to the silence of our steely protagonist.
I see what you did there, ha ha lol.
 

NinjaDeathSlap

Leaf on the wind
Feb 20, 2011
4,474
0
0
Gyrohelix said:
HERP DERP HALO 3 WUZ GUD CUZ OF MULTIPLAYER HERP DERP. Just shut up and go back to your sandbox and make a castle or some shit because you have the mind of a 4 year old.
Umm... and this was directed at who?

OT: I'm reserving judgment on weather continuing the franchise after Reach was a mistake until I actually get the chance to play Halo 4. On the one hand I'm skeptical and would hate to see one of my favorite game franchises (and the franchise that pretty much first got me serious about gaming) to end up as an annual copy-pasted sequel churner. On the other hand, I would also hate for a series that is so important to me to just end when there is still the possibility of good material still there. So I'm trying to stay as objective as possible.
 

Nokiro

New member
Aug 5, 2011
44
0
0
Halo 4 shouldn't even exist. So yeah, it would be great if they stopped there.
 

Tsaba

reconnoiter
Oct 6, 2009
1,435
0
0
1 should of been the last master chief halo, then they made 2 so they had to make 3. Three should of been the last master chief halo and now they are making 4 so they have to make 5-6.
 

inFAMOUSCowZ

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,586
0
0
I'm calling it, its going to tie into marathon, I mean it makes sense from the lore perspective. And it would be great story wise, if you are remotely interested in the Halo books, read them. The most recent one talks of the Forerunners, its great.
 

Uber Evil

New member
Mar 4, 2009
1,108
0
0
I'm thinking the next few Halos will probably suffer from some form of Fanon Discontinuity [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FanonDiscontinuity] unless they are really good. Let them make shit games, I say. I'm not gonna buy them.
 

cthulhumythos

New member
Aug 28, 2009
637
0
0
Uber Evil said:
I'm thinking the next few Halos will probably suffer from some form of Fanon Discontinuity [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FanonDiscontinuity] unless they are really good. Let them make shit games, I say. I'm not gonna buy them.
what next few other halos?
 

Kiju

New member
Apr 20, 2009
832
0
0
It should have ended with the first one.

Flood stopped, Covenant defeated, Master Chief alive.

Good ending, bad idea that they decided to continue it.
 

Cogwheel

New member
Apr 3, 2010
1,375
0
0
Nope. Not that I play them, mind you, but this move makes it fairly clear that they don't care about story anyway, so if ending it in time was an issue, Halo 4 being made means it's already kinda too late for that.


...That said? Multiplayer might improve, and a lot of people will still play that. Many will enjoy it. In short, those that dislike the new games can ignore them, while a lot of people will have fun with each new Halo game, so why not make more?
 

otakon17

New member
Jun 21, 2010
1,338
0
0
Halo 3 should have been the last Halo. There was no damn point for Reach or ODST. Another Halo is just them squeezing the utters of the franchise to the point that dust flies out. It's an okay game that's riot in multiplayer if you don't get some damn sniping savant on the other team or a squadmate who won't shut off their fucking ever BLASTING MUSIC. The only thing I truly found epic about the series as a whole would be the music.
 

IBlackKiteI

New member
Mar 12, 2010
1,613
0
0
Kiju said:
It should have ended with the first one.

Flood stopped, Covenant defeated, Master Chief alive.

Good ending, bad idea that they decided to continue it.
Bingo.

Halo 4 shouldn't be made, but seeing as it is I wish it would be multiplayer only because the last good campaign was CE's.
 

Awexsome

Were it so easy
Mar 25, 2009
1,549
0
0
So long as 343i can keep up the high quality of the series they can make a billion more for all I care. Although the shortened development time between games usually a sign of either less quality or much less variety between the sequels.

It's old development cycle was great. Halo CE -> 2 -> 3 -> Reach. 3 years development between each game.

ODST and Wars (and now CE anniversary) recently kinda gave the illusion of Halo being overused so it would've been a good idea to give it a break for a while.
 

Nico4

New member
Dec 24, 2008
125
0
0
Halo 3 should have been the last, after all the attempts Bungie did, to en.... no wait, they didn't try to end it. No one tries to send a series, when they throw in a stupid cliffhanger for the people who finish it on the hardest difficulty. Discussing whenever Halo 4 should be the last Halo is pointless, because they'll still pour out 5 & 6