Kaboose the Moose said:
-Snip-
True again, but just because there are things worse than (x), doesn't mean that (x) can be dismissed because it isn't as catastrophic as

. It could even be that (x) passively catalyzes

or something to that effect.
I say parents should give a little more thought into naming their offspring before settling with names like 'Apple' or 'Moses'. As you say, people are assholes..let's not give them anymore ammunition that they can find
Hah, if only everything in life could be blamed on names. But that isn't the case.
Violet isn't a bad. name. Crunchy McHamburger is a bad name. Book Case is a bad name. Any of the other examples of things that are not normally used as the names of people, are bad names. Violet is a used name. Sure, let them think it over, but as long as it is a working name, it is fine. Violet wouldn't be as bad as something like Margaret for a boy's name. In this current time. Times change.
I'm all for putting some sort of restriction on names, but not to the point where it comes down to sex differences. Just because it is normally a girl's name does not mean it should not be a boy's name. And vice versa.