Should you brag about your IQ?

Recommended Videos

Zobers

New member
May 28, 2009
21
0
0
I find that people brag more about unofficial IQ tests. For example: "Hey, man! I just scored 160 on a Facebook IQ test!"
 

TikiShades

New member
May 6, 2009
535
0
0
An IQ of 140 on one person's test could be a 200 for someone else. His IQ might also be only a 120 on a different IQ test.
 

Lord Azrael

New member
Apr 16, 2009
125
0
0
MontyGommo said:
If you IQ is actually that high, you should be smart enough to know not to brag about it.
I'm not sure why everybody seems so frightened by the prospect of some measure of intelligence, I mean, sportsmen brag about the speed at which they can run the 100m but that doesn't put other sportsmen off, it inspires them to do better - to beat the other person in sporting competition. I believe that IQ is not arbitrary (nature) but can be developed by training your brain (nurture), you know; reading books, playing games, studying etc.

I would do spectacularly badly at the 100m run at my current state of fitness but given a few weeks training I'm sure I would make a noticeable improvement. There can be such a thing as bragging whilst maintaining modesty, I mean I haven't put anyone down, I have nurtured my brain for 25 years much like an athelete will have nurtured his body. No-one can run a 4-minute mile without some kind of training.

Constructive comments pleeease. :)
 

ThreeWords

New member
Feb 27, 2009
5,179
0
0
I don't think you should boast about IQ, just like you shouldn't boast about other physical attributes, but that doesn't mean I mind when people do

My IQ is 138, and that's from a real test, given to me by an educational psychologist

Assassinator said:
Someone who really really really sucks with numbers (like moi) will fuck up an IQ test wich would result in a lower score.
Not true. The IQ test is based on patterns, deductions (ie odd one out), memory and understanding (definitions or emotions). Granted, there is a small bit of maths, but it hardly counts for anything (I did kinda badly in that bit, and I still got way above the 'average' of 100)
 

TriggerUnhappy

New member
Mar 4, 2009
1,530
0
0
Lord Azrael said:
TriggerUnhappy said:
An IQ test is NOT about memorizing formulae, the test is designed to be independant of learned phenomena so it tests pattern matching skills and the ability to think outside the box.

I would think the average IQ for the posters on this fine forum to be higher than 100 (base average) simply due to the fact that we are computer literate and (mostly apart from trolls) able to articulate ourselves somewhat eloquently. [sic]

I realise that different IQ tests can be subjective but what of MENSA ones, I'm at 146, that's not bragging, it's a statement of 'fact'. I do notice I find it easier to talk to people who are in the same sort of bracket as me - 120 plus - just because they are more likely to understand what I'm talking about and the tangents I go off on.

Come shoot me down but I'm trying to balance the litany of hate!
You misunderstand me I believe, I do agree that those who high on IQ tests are often smarter than those that score lower (I mean significantly though). However, believe that there's no way to really measure intelligence, there's too many subjects, ideas, philosophies, facts, etc. to just pack into one test. A person could study for 200 years straight and still only be hitting the tip of the iceberg. Plus, there are certain things that really just can't be measured, such as common sense, creativity, problem solving, etc. Also, the brain is not always consistent, you may be considered amazing at problem solving but get stumped at the simplest of problems. Those are things you can only learn by actually getting to know a person and seeing what they're like. Besides, even if you could measure them, there's no accurate way to put a score for it and dictate that one person's smarter than the other because they received 5 more points, or even 10. Regardless, we don't even fully understand the human brain yet so to try and measure a person's intelligence with only a partial understanding of the subject is just futile in itself.

Finally though, IQ tests are pointless even if they are reliable, because it proves nothing whatsoever. What does it show you, that you're smarter than someone else? IQ tests do nothing other than soothe the ego of people that want to prove how smart they are, which is pretty funny because one would have to be stupid to brag about a simple score they got for their intelligence. The reason being, nobody is truly smart at all, we know so little about everything around us yet insist that we're amazingly intelligent. The truly smart people realize just how little they know in the grand scheme of things, but make due with what they have and know, and keep trying to learn more.

Sorry for the long rant, came out longer than I thought it would be.
 

Fruitloops89

New member
Feb 20, 2009
437
0
0
I remember someone who bragged about his IQ in high school. He did not have too many friends during his stay.
 

Lord Azrael

New member
Apr 16, 2009
125
0
0
TriggerUnhappy said:
Lord Azrael said:
TriggerUnhappy said:
An IQ test is NOT about memorizing formulae, the test is designed to be independant of learned phenomena so it tests pattern matching skills and the ability to think outside the box.

I would think the average IQ for the posters on this fine forum to be higher than 100 (base average) simply due to the fact that we are computer literate and (mostly apart from trolls) able to articulate ourselves somewhat eloquently. [sic]

I realise that different IQ tests can be subjective but what of MENSA ones, I'm at 146, that's not bragging, it's a statement of 'fact'. I do notice I find it easier to talk to people who are in the same sort of bracket as me - 120 plus - just because they are more likely to understand what I'm talking about and the tangents I go off on.

Come shoot me down but I'm trying to balance the litany of hate!
You misunderstand me I believe, I do agree that those who high on IQ tests are often smarter than those that score lower (I mean significantly though). However, believe that there's no way to really measure intelligence, there's too many subjects, ideas, philosophies, facts, etc. to just pack into one test. A person could study for 200 years straight and still only be hitting the tip of the iceberg. Plus, there are certain things that really just can't be measured, such as common sense, creativity, problem solving, etc. Also, the brain is not always consistent, you may be considered amazing at problem solving but get stumped at the simplest of problems. Those are things you can only learn by actually getting to know a person and seeing what they're like. Besides, even if you could measure them, there's no accurate way to put a score for it and dictate that one person's smarter than the other because they received 5 more points, or even 10. Regardless, we don't even fully understand the human brain yet so to try and measure a person's intelligence with only a partial understanding of the subject is just futile in itself.

Finally though, IQ tests are pointless even if they are reliable, because it proves nothing whatsoever. What does it show you, that you're smarter than someone else? IQ tests do nothing other than soothe the ego of people that want to prove how smart they are, which is pretty funny because one would have to be stupid to brag about a simple score they got for their intelligence. The reason being, nobody is truly smart at all, we know so little about everything around us yet insist that we're amazingly intelligent. The truly smart people realize just how little they know in the grand scheme of things, but make due with what they have and know, and keep trying to learn more.

Sorry for the long rant, came out longer than I thought it would be.
Yep, I agree that it's not an absolute scale, someone with an IQ of 150 is not necessarily cleverer than someone with 145, but they are likely to be more savvy than someone with an IQ of 110 for example. You might have missed my other post during your epic dissertation (all about sprinters!) :) I know I do that sometimes!
 

Nickolai77

New member
Apr 3, 2009
2,843
0
0
I've taken a few IQ tests and i'm around average. The problem with IQ tests are that society in general takes them as a scientifically expected, absolutely certain measure of intelligence- and sometimes the success of job applicants depend on IQ test results.

The massive problem with IQ tests are that they, and other people have pointed this out in the thread, that they only measure a certain part of intelligence. Namely how good you are at numbers and seeing patterns in phrases and at completing brain puzzles. IQ tests do not measure- how good ones intelligence is in terms of rational reasoning in a real life context, how intelligent you are at absorbing information, your emotional intelligence, practical "common sense" intelligence, making links between seemingly un-related strands of information in a real-life setting...

I could go on- but i think how we all define "intelligence" is rather vague...

My opinion is that having a high IQ score means you can only reasonably say your good at IQ tests. You have to be careful how you can apply a high IQ score to anything else- especially to say that you are, to use that vague word- "intelligent".
 

MelziGurl

New member
Jan 16, 2009
1,096
0
0
Brag about it if you really must, but I personally think it makes people look like arrogant twats.
 

Zombie_Fish

Opiner of Mottos
Mar 20, 2009
4,584
0
0
Mine's about 104, but IQ is never something to brag about. The problem is whether or not not just the tests can be trusted, but also whather or not IQ itself can be trusted as a measure of intelligence.
 

PyroZombie

New member
Apr 24, 2009
354
0
0
The entire IQ point scale is worthless.

Intelligence is something that can't be rated,talked about, or bragged about, only used and seen.

There are people with high IQs that act like assclowns, and there are people with low IQs that act like someone with half a mind.