i smell trouble a brewin!!!Nieroshai said:Unless you're pals with an official reviewer, I can't see how you could be playing an actual copy of the game.
Watching this, I can't help but wonder if the OP is lying or just plain not doing anything.Aetherlblade said:Check this on the animation:
http://www.screwattack.com/trailers/elder-scrolls-v-skyrim-animation-skyrim
looks pretty good to me, right?
Actually that's exactly how it works. The development tools and the optimizing gets better with trial and error, but the capabilities of the Xbox 360 and the PS3 is the same now as it was 5 years ago.Macrobstar said:But it does have graphics far superior to oblivion, skyrims look awesome, oblivions textures are all super smooth.Yopaz said:A game made for the same hardware as Oblivion doesn't have graphics that are far superior to Oblivion? That's surprising.
Do PC gamers all have this notion that because consoles are 5 years old the graphics are as well? thats not how it works
that doesn't prove anything for 2 reasons:Duffeknol said:go to page two and read my spoilersnuba km said:[HEADING=1]WAIT A MOMENT[/HEADING]
all you said was stuff that happened in the 22min demo that is on youtube and I am sure the characters standing there having a conversation weren't the ones who were talking about dragons, and the reason the guy stopped running for his life is because gameplay demos like that are normally scripted a lot more then the actual game.
So, I am going to go with a lot of people and call troll on oyu till I have played the game and can judge for myself.
Released early in Norway? That's incorrect. I can't find anything about that on any of the websites for the different stores here. When I pre-ordered they told me that I would get it at 11.11.11, but that I might get it on the 10.11.11 (days first, not months), but that I would have to wait for it to get unlocked on Steam. Oh, and before you ask, YES, I checked the console versions too.Aetherlblade said:Nope it has been released early in retail stores in the Netherlands and Norway. It was on the news, and although im dutch too i already preordered for steam so i cant go pick it upLucien Pyrus said:Uhhh... from the netherlands and playing the game early legally? I seriously doubt that. I have a feeling this is just an attempt to bash skyrim without actually playing it..
Obviously but the actually graphics quality isn't as bad as 2006Yopaz said:Actually that's exactly how it works. The development tools and the optimizing gets better with trial and error, but the capabilities of the Xbox 360 and the PS3 is the same now as it was 5 years ago.Macrobstar said:But it does have graphics far superior to oblivion, skyrims look awesome, oblivions textures are all super smooth.Yopaz said:A game made for the same hardware as Oblivion doesn't have graphics that are far superior to Oblivion? That's surprising.
Do PC gamers all have this notion that because consoles are 5 years old the graphics are as well? thats not how it works
really, you guys just dont read. like has been said before, it released early in the netherlands.Jegsimmons said:i smell trouble a brewin!!!Nieroshai said:Unless you're pals with an official reviewer, I can't see how you could be playing an actual copy of the game.
To be fair not one of those things has anything to do with how good a game is or plays. Maybe I'm old school, but I think those are pretty frivolous things. I just want to make sure it has all the elements that made oblivion fun, and from what I hear it does. Is it just oblivion with new graphics and a new setting? If it is I am more then sold.Duffeknol said:The same weightless physics, the same horrible character animations, the same awkward standstill conversations (though now not as zoomed in, and sometimes they even move their hands)
I don't think there is much of that if any at all really. This won't be character centric. But from a Let's play I watched, the dialogue is decent. Not grande, not shit, just decent. I thought the dialogue in Oblivion was robotic and dull as hell. There is still a touch of robotic but I don't find it dull. The story seems average as well. Considering these are the weak points of Bethesda, the fact that they are "average" and not "crap" is good enough for me. I have always wanted to enjoy TES games but the closest they came was Morrowind but the NPC crap just butchered it for me. To me, this looks like streamlined Morrowind with better dialogue.Thomas Rembrandt said:I would like to know how they improved the dialog system (if at all):
- Morrowind's NPCs were basicly little wikipedias featuring general and local topics with no personality whatsoever.
- Oblivion's NPCs were pretty much only notice boards where you got your little quest and after completion, you never spoke to again.
Did they improve on that? Are there actual characters in this game, you know like people you meet early in the game, form some kind of bond with and meet later where they help you in any way?
So, what you are saying is: The least important things in the series didn't get fixed. Well good to have gotten that out of the way. Also, from what I've seen of conversations, you aren't locked in to the conversation like you used to be, which is the only major conversing fix I wanted. The fact that they look at me and blink when I'm talking to them doesn't really seem all that odd. I'd feel a little pissed off if someone didn't at least look at me while they talked to me. I super expected the weightless physics and he horrible animations though.Duffeknol said:Played it yesterday for a few hours since a buddy of mine got it (legally) early on PS3.
Yes, it looks nice, but why does everything else feel the same? The same weightless physics, the same horrible character animations, the same awkward standstill conversations (though now not as zoomed in, and sometimes they even move their hands), the same absolutely idiotic AI...
Or a nice FUCKING KILLING DRAGONS simulator.Oh well, it'll still be a nice walk-in-the-mountains simulator.