Fun fact: the voice cast includes the english VA for Rei Ayanami from Evangelion.Bob_McMillan said:I mean, the game looks horrible.
The voice acting sounds fine, surprisingly.
Fun fact: the voice cast includes the english VA for Rei Ayanami from Evangelion.Bob_McMillan said:I mean, the game looks horrible.
The voice acting sounds fine, surprisingly.
Yes, it does. You don't have to play it or even install it.Zhukov said:Don't you have to buy a game on Steam to leave a user review on that game? Would people really hate-buy her stuff just to review bomb it? I know she pissed off some truly pathetic people, but that would be quite the show of dedication.
I suppose people could be buying it, playing it less than the refund threshold, bombing it, then getting a refund. Does the review stay if you do that?
I wish there were ways I could agree with this more. I'd also like to point out the rather irritating tendency of a certain particular subset of people and certainly not an entire audience to complain about how they're all being unfairly tarred by journos/pundits/bloggers whatever and then instantly turn around and say how all said journos/feminists/sjw's/whatever clearly want xyz games banned or censored.Silvanus said:You're far from the only person, because I've heard this quite a bit. However, most of the time, when I'm actually shown the examples in question, they're usually not generalising everybody who takes part in the hobby, but rather identifying a specific behaviour or sub-set. Which is fair.Bilious Green said:Not just GG. She and people like Zoe Quinn tarred a lot of gamers who had nothing to do with GG with the whole unhelpful "gamers are abusive monsters" stereotype, when GG was really just a vanishingly small collection of idiots on reddit and not at all representative of gamers as a whole. I had nothing to do with the whole sorry saga, but I found myself having to justify my hobby to people who didn't understand what was going on and just saw the articles in the mainstream press. Suffice to say, that annoyed me a great deal. I doubt I'm the only person irked at being tarred with the same brush as GG merely by virtue of proximity.
For example, when Jim Sterling was identifying specific (bad) behaviours that a number of No Man's Sky fans had been taking part in, the accusation thrown back was that he was tarring the whole playerbase of the game, which he never had. Similarly, when the infamous "Gamers are dead" article came out, I saw list after list counting other, perfectly moderate articles as equally culpable. To defend against what they saw as tarring everybody with the same brush, people were tarring everybody with the same brush.
TL;DR: I'm sceptical that this is actually the case.
She's spent the last few months reworking the game to make it more appropriate for a PC platform, and addresses complaints about the characters being too sexy by altering their proportions and outfits (IE, the main character getting more of an armoured look).bastardofmelbourne said:What is it, a PC port of an iOS game? No wonder it looks like ass.
Barely even human?Fox12 said:Brianna Wu vs GG again, huh? How I feel about this:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I doubt anybody's complained that these characters are too sexy, they're hideous.Windknight said:She's spent the last few months reworking the game to make it more appropriate for a PC platform, and addresses complaints about the characters being too sexy by altering their proportions and outfits
It reminds me of my sister. She wants her life to be better and for people to like her more. But she doesn't want to actually DO anything to bring it about.Phasmal said:Y'know, it always makes me laugh when in some threads we bemoan the poor public image gamers have, and then in other threads we have people saying things like "That'll teach that woman to have opinions about gamers like two years ago!"- like we're all a bunch of fucking rabid attack dogs.
Honestly who even cares. If you wanna play her game play her game, if you don't, surely there are better things you could be doing with your time that review bombing.
She is also the very definition of professional victim.MrFalconfly said:Readers digest.Frankster said:Can some of us get some backstory because i have no idea who this person is or why this game is note worthy?
edit: quick google turns up she is related to gamergate somehow? bleh maybe i dont want to know.
She started off insulting everyone that wasn't in her immediate circle of friends, and then tried to sell a game to the very people she insulted.
Not the best business strategy (especially when said game looks like CGI arse from the mid 90s).
I did hear of her lying on that, damn. And screwing over backers is some Tim Schafer shit, of wait, its several times worse in her case.Here Comes Tomorrow said:As usual the truth is somewhere between the two. She isn't completly innocent in the whole affair.Frankster said:The plot thickens!Windknight said:The usual GG BS
Like the time she made a thread on Revolution 60s steam forum attacking herself (and refering to herself rather grandiosly as a "noted feminist") while still logged in under her dev account.
On topic: shes selling cut scenes and some other stuff as DLC for some reason, the Kickstarter backers had to pay $20 for the base "get the game" level and she then sold it for $10 on Steam and the "special edition" for $15. The kickstarter backers got keys for the basic edition.
Also, she claims to have made the battle music here
https://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/701823289283444736
When it's actually a .99c royalty free track you can buy on amazon (sample included)
https://www.amazon.com/Cut-to-the-Chase/dp/B008S69D24
To be fair, a good chunk of said criticism was from GG trolls trying to 'divide and conquer' by pretending to be 'SJW's'. Which is why Broliday was presented the way he was.Breakdown said:I doubt anybody's complained that these characters are too sexy, they're hideous.Windknight said:She's spent the last few months reworking the game to make it more appropriate for a PC platform, and addresses complaints about the characters being too sexy by altering their proportions and outfits
To be fair, unless the PC version was radically improved over the iOS original (to the point of being barely recognizable), it deserves every negative review it gets. It's a mess that has only gotten any real attention for two reasons: It has an entirely female dev team with a trans woman with the right politics at the lead and therefore gets automatic praise (remember all the cattiness that went down when she had coffee with the CEO of Stardock, which made her persona non grata for a while because he's a wrongthinker?) and she's not terrible at manipulating social media into generally believing that anyone who doesn't like her work doesn't like it because of misogyny or transphobia and revving up the social justice brigade to give her a boost.AndrewVE said:And of course, it gets negative reviewed bombed into oblivion.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/350200/
While I believe that quite a few of the negative reviews are genuine and are specifically targeting the game; looking at the rest, you start to suspect that these are mostly GamerGaters and alt-righters who have a long-lasting axe to grind with Miss Wu.