So I beat Dragon Age: Ori- Wait what? Oh fuck you EA!

Recommended Videos

Skoldpadda

New member
Jan 13, 2010
835
0
0
When I read the topic title I thought it was going to be about that atrocious 30 Seconds To Mars song during the credits.
 

Windcaler

New member
Nov 7, 2010
1,332
0
0
Do you expect there to be after game content in every RPG you play? If not then I dont think you have a leg to stand on, most games end when the final bit of the main story line is done. Very few play out afterwards.

If you do then why arent we hearing screw obsidian for fallout, Sqaure enix for Final fantasy, etc?
 

Blood Brain Barrier

New member
Nov 21, 2011
2,004
0
0
Solo-Wing said:
burningdragoon said:
Seriously? This is the silliest BioWare rant I have ever seen. And that is really saying something.
Oh excuse me for wanting to finish the rest of the games quests and do more stuff with my character! I guess this is my punishment for only using Auto-saves!
Precisely. If you saved properly throughout the game you could have finished the sidequests before you finished the game.

Even then, you should know to always finish side quests before you finish the main quest. Unless it's a Bethesda game.
 

Solo-Wing

Wanna have a bad time?
Dec 15, 2010
3,642
0
0
Blood Brain Barrier said:
Solo-Wing said:
burningdragoon said:
Seriously? This is the silliest BioWare rant I have ever seen. And that is really saying something.
Oh excuse me for wanting to finish the rest of the games quests and do more stuff with my character! I guess this is my punishment for only using Auto-saves!
Precisely. If you saved properly throughout the game you could have finished the sidequests before you finished the game.

Even then, you should know to always finish side quests before you finish the main quest. Unless it's a Bethesda game.
Or Square-Enix. Or nearly all the RPGs I have played. it would seem only Bio-ware pulls this crap :/
 

Adam Jensen_v1legacy

I never asked for this
Sep 8, 2011
6,651
0
0
It's a classic RPG that ends when you finish the main quest. Don't tell me this is the first RPG of this type you played?
 

Solo-Wing

Wanna have a bad time?
Dec 15, 2010
3,642
0
0
Windcaler said:
Do you expect there to be after game content in every RPG you play? If not then I dont think you have a leg to stand on, most games end when the final bit of the main story line is done. Very few play out afterwards.

If you do then why arent we hearing screw obsidian for fallout, Sqaure enix for Final fantasy, etc?
Because they take you back to the point BEFORE you fight the final battle. Letting you go back when ever you want.
This game saved me in the post game where I cannot do anything without buying DLC.
 

Windcaler

New member
Nov 7, 2010
1,332
0
0
Solo-Wing said:
Windcaler said:
Do you expect there to be after game content in every RPG you play? If not then I dont think you have a leg to stand on, most games end when the final bit of the main story line is done. Very few play out afterwards.

If you do then why arent we hearing screw obsidian for fallout, Sqaure enix for Final fantasy, etc?
Because they take you back to the point BEFORE you fight the final battle. Letting you go back when ever you want.
This game saved me in the post game where I cannot do anything without buying DLC.
I still think you have no one to blame but yourself. Common sense dictates that you save the game before going into important story parts or battles. This has been true for nearly 30 years, way back when Final fantasy was the "best rpg made" perhaps even before that. I have no idea why anyone would suddenly think the 2nd rule of RPGs doesnt apply anymore
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
Solo-Wing said:
Blood Brain Barrier said:
Solo-Wing said:
burningdragoon said:
Seriously? This is the silliest BioWare rant I have ever seen. And that is really saying something.
Oh excuse me for wanting to finish the rest of the games quests and do more stuff with my character! I guess this is my punishment for only using Auto-saves!
Precisely. If you saved properly throughout the game you could have finished the sidequests before you finished the game.

Even then, you should know to always finish side quests before you finish the main quest. Unless it's a Bethesda game.
Or Square-Enix. Or nearly all the RPGs I have played. it would seem only Bio-ware pulls this crap :/
Granted, I stopped playing the FF series after 10...but every FF I've ever played cuts to the credits and the title screen upon completion. Every RPG, for that matter (with the exception of Bethesda games and Mass Effect 2) is done once you've beaten the main story line. But to be fair, Bethesda games are sandbox-RPGs, and thus specifically built for piddling around after the end of the main story.
 

Azure-Supernova

La-li-lu-le-lo!
Aug 5, 2009
3,024
0
0
As far as I could tell the post-game is purely there as a hub for the DLC. It sucks, really don't make sense to put you back before the finale, only to cockblock you from the game's content and only let you play the DLC.
 

Yureina

Who are you?
May 6, 2010
7,098
0
0
Welcome to EA/Bioware games. Isn't it fun?

Aside from ME2, which I liked too much, i've never fell for this little scheme of theirs. But never again I say. They are dead to me now. :eek:
 

DustyDrB

Made of ticky tacky
Jan 19, 2010
8,365
3
43
Yureina said:
Welcome to EA/Bioware games. Isn't it fun?

Aside from ME2, which I liked too much, i've never fell for this little scheme of theirs. But never again I say. They are dead to me now. :eek:
Scheme? When the story ends, it ends. I see no scheme.
 

SycoMantis91

New member
Dec 21, 2011
343
0
0
It is rather crazy to expect end-game content. But I do agree it's pretty shitty with both DA:O and DA2 that they plop you back at camp ad don't let you do anything. It sucks that they tease you with the idea of end-game content and pull it away from you as you reach for it, laughing like a bully holding your books above your head just out of your reach. It shouldn't be expected, but the way they go about it sucks.
 

Kahunaburger

New member
May 6, 2011
4,141
0
0
Listen, I know that EA is basically the physical incarnation of evil, but they are probably not to blame for linear storytelling being linear.
 

Shilkanni

New member
Mar 28, 2010
146
0
0
Pretty sure a game ending isn't a bizarre ploy to get you to buy DLC.
The game ending at the conclusion of the game gives closure and makes sense to me.

I was really happy with how it ended - my reaction on finishing it was to start another game and try to finish on nightmare and see more of what I missed.
 

Blood Brain Barrier

New member
Nov 21, 2011
2,004
0
0
poiumty said:
Solo-Wing said:
burningdragoon said:
Seriously? This is the silliest BioWare rant I have ever seen. And that is really saying something.
Oh excuse me for wanting to finish the rest of the games quests and do more stuff with my character! I guess this is my punishment for only using Auto-saves!
Why yes. Yes it is. What the hell were you thinking?

Never rely only on auto-saves again. They're safety measures, not your personal checkpoints. Hopefully next time you'll learn your lesson.
If you're a console player, auto-saves are all that exist. Sadly.
 

CrystalShadow

don't upset the insane catgirl
Apr 11, 2009
3,829
0
0
Windcaler said:
Solo-Wing said:
Windcaler said:
Do you expect there to be after game content in every RPG you play? If not then I dont think you have a leg to stand on, most games end when the final bit of the main story line is done. Very few play out afterwards.

If you do then why arent we hearing screw obsidian for fallout, Sqaure enix for Final fantasy, etc?
Because they take you back to the point BEFORE you fight the final battle. Letting you go back when ever you want.
This game saved me in the post game where I cannot do anything without buying DLC.
I still think you have no one to blame but yourself. Common sense dictates that you save the game before going into important story parts or battles. This has been true for nearly 30 years, way back when Final fantasy was the "best rpg made" perhaps even before that. I have no idea why anyone would suddenly think the 2nd rule of RPGs doesnt apply anymore
What HAVE you been playing? Up until the playstation era (and even quite a bit beyond that in many cases), most games gave you 3 save slots, and in a surprising number of cases, would not even ask you which you wanted to use.

The most you got was, 'do you want to save? Yes/no'... If you chose yes it would save over the top of whatever slot you were using.

Slightly more forgiving series would let you choose which slot every time you saved, but still, with just 3 save slots that doesn't really help all that much...

I also have never really come across a game the pulls the stunt the OP is complaining about... If you try and resume a game from a save when you've 'completed' the game, You don't usually end up in a situation where you literally can't do anything.
 

DanielBrown

Dangerzone!
Dec 3, 2010
3,838
0
0
Solo-Wing said:
I might have bought some DLC, but then they went and took everything that made the game good away in order to push their DLC.
Best if you don't anyway. I bought the fortress DLC pack and got the Shale one with the game and they aren't longer than 15 minutes. Been extremely sceptic to DLC ever since. Only game I've played with DLC I thought was worth it so far was Borderlands Secret Armory and Island of Dr. Ned.