Snotnarok said:
I think people need to know the difference between furry...and anthropomorphic. Robin Hood Disney movie is anthro, furry is guy in a suit made after Krystal from Star Fox.
I've been struggling with this when trying to make a species for my sci-fi comic, I have species with wet skin, dry skin, metal, rugged and that's fine but I made one that had fur on it and instantly "Cool furfag". There's a difference, I'm not interested in screwing the drawing.
Radoh said:
Bocaj2000 said:
Radoh said:
Bocaj2000 said:
I agree with that part where it says in the OT that furry avatars have the character smiling in a whimsical way. Personally, I find whimsicalness and quirky characters to be annoying if this is their prime trait.
For any furry, I have a question:
I think that minotaurs and werewolves are awesome. I do not find them sexually attractive in any way shape or form, but there is a slight fascination towards these badass creatures of destruction. Is that being a furry?
For my (and at least 248 other people on this site) definition of furry, yes it would. So tell me, how does it feel being a furry?
Everyone I know is a furry if this the case. It feels like an inane label.
Not exactly. Say you take a show that has anthros in it and replace them with people. Those who get upset about this are furries while the ones who couldn't care less are not. This isn't the perfect analogy but since I'm not particularly eloquent today it will have to do until someone else says it better.
I don't know; I'm not a furry, but I would be mad if Disney announced they were making new episodes of
Talespin, but when the episodes finally premiered, all of the anthropomorphic animals were suddenly human. It could still be a good show, but it wouldn't be
Talespin anymore. I think a better example would be if someone made a new show that had a similar plot and equal quality to something involving anthropomorphic animals -- let's keep using
Talespin as an example. The people who liked
Talespin because it was a well written adventure series would like both shows, whereas the people who liked
Talespin but not the hypothetical new show would be furries.
Of course, my personal definition of "furry" when talking about people is "someone who identifies as a furry." When dealing with media, it's a bit tougher to define, but it has to do with the tone of the piece. The
Loony Toons characters are not furries, because they were created well before the idea of "furry" existed, and the tone is all wrong as a result. VG Cats is questionable, because it came after furry fandom started, and the art style is pretty heavily influenced by it, but I wouldn't personally categorize it as a furry comic, because the tone isn't furry-ish. As for something with the right tone? I can't think of any aside from the furry porn that occasionally winds up on various 4chan boards, but I know there's some non-porn examples out there. The spoilered picture in CPU46's post looks like it probably is one, but for all I know the next page could involve copious amounts of animal dong...