Depends how desperate. I mean for humanity. It could take a few hours to reason we should start ASAP. If there is still hope, maybe a few days, weeks
It explicitly says that for this scenario, she won't. In non-scenario terms, that's my style. My technique, if you will.Souplex said:She could always make a move.kwagamon said:If I was the last man on Earth, regardless of how many women there were, humanity would grind to a halt. This isn't saying that no woman would want me or anything emo like that, it's just that I could NEVER work up the nerve to just openly say something like that.
...I should probably do something about that.
Humans only cause insanity, find a sock puppet. If everyone else is dead they should be on sale! Supply and demand mantobi the good boy said:No i wouldn't, not to keen on humanity(im certain its our fault we ended up in this situation) but sure i'd keep them around for amusement and company (and to drive off insanity) like with any friend.
If you have ever played SimCity where you have spent hours building up your ideal city and then you get that feeling where you are tempted to click the red button labeled "initiate natural disaster"...yeah, I assume even god can get bored.maddawg IAJI said:I think if an all knowing deity existed, then the disaster wouldn't have happened in the first place xDKaboose the Moose said:Though if some major religions are to be believed then perhaps the last two people on earth could make like Adam & Eve 2.0 and hope an all-knowing and all-powerful deity can sort shit out.maddawg IAJI said:The 3rd Generation of offspring would most likely be mentally disabled unless you could find another person to mate with. There isn't even a real gurante that your offspring would survive given the conditions and if you lack the training to deliver said baby safely.Kaboose the Moose said:Shag first. Consequences be damned!
Also repopulating the world with only two people means that the subsequent generations will have a similar gene pool. That's just not a good idea in an evolutionary perspective.
Words of wisdom,2fish said:Humans only cause insanity, find a sock puppet. If everyone else is dead they should be on sale! Supply and demand mantobi the good boy said:No i wouldn't, not to keen on humanity(im certain its our fault we ended up in this situation) but sure i'd keep them around for amusement and company (and to drive off insanity) like with any friend.![]()
Very very true my friend. Just reading that, I guess that would explain why everyone likes staring at Car Crashes too.Kaboose the Moose said:If you have ever played SimCity where you have spent hours building up your ideal city and then you get that feeling where you are tempted to click the red button labeled "initiate natural disaster"...yeah, I assume even god can get bored.maddawg IAJI said:I think if an all knowing deity existed, then the disaster wouldn't have happened in the first place xDKaboose the Moose said:Though if some major religions are to be believed then perhaps the last two people on earth could make like Adam & Eve 2.0 and hope an all-knowing and all-powerful deity can sort shit out.maddawg IAJI said:The 3rd Generation of offspring would most likely be mentally disabled unless you could find another person to mate with. There isn't even a real gurante that your offspring would survive given the conditions and if you lack the training to deliver said baby safely.Kaboose the Moose said:Shag first. Consequences be damned!
Also repopulating the world with only two people means that the subsequent generations will have a similar gene pool. That's just not a good idea in an evolutionary perspective.
There is nothing like introducing a little bit of chaos into organised life..for teh lulz xD
This. With 2 human beings and only 2 it is simply not going to work. If I wake up and discover I'm the last human alive, I'm not going to look for sex. I'm going to spend the rest of my life packing and burying artifacts of humanity and, doing my damndest to carve out monuments that I and humanity existed.maddawg IAJI said:If it is only two people, Repopulation is out of the question. Not a big enough Gene Pool. You'd need a good number of people to make a sustainable population and even then, that wouldn't last forever.
You'd need a lot more then that man. At least a good hundred or so just to make sure that you have enough Diversity.canadamus_prime said:That's pretty much what I was going to say. Contrary to popular belief, 2 individuals aren't enough to repopulate an entire species. To establish a viable population, I'd estimate that you'd need to begin with at least 10 individuals, 5 males and 5 females.maddawg IAJI said:If it is only two people, Repopulation is out of the question. Not a big enough Gene Pool. You'd need a good number of people to make a sustainable population and even then, that wouldn't last forever.
Yeah but there's a difference between bilblical Adam and Eve and two modern humans. Even though I don't believe in it, the Adam and Eve of the bible were basically perfect humans, close to superhuman, tall strong and without a single genetic defect. They lived for centuries if not millenias, in fact pre-flood humans in general were meant to live for ages Noah died at the age of 900. It was only post floods that humans weren't allowed to marry relatives and didn't live to much more than a 100. Yeah so once again I don't believe this, just yeah Adam and Eve work within the context of the story.Kaboose the Moose said:Though if some major religions are to be believed then perhaps the last two people on earth could make like Adam & Eve 2.0 and hope an all-knowing and all-powerful deity can sort shit out.
You'd probably want more males than females because that way you can produce more offspring at once. While inbreeding is going to be a problem, applying eugenics (the only time I think it's probably aceptable) in preventing those with obvious defects from breeding should hopefully breed out obvious bad conditions (internal stuff we can't really monitor). There are species such as the Cheetah who've gone through a huge genetic bottleneck and had to undergo a large amount of inbreeding but have made it back after the defects were breed out of the group and died.canadamus_prime said:That's pretty much what I was going to say. Contrary to popular belief, 2 individuals aren't enough to repopulate an entire species. To establish a viable population, I'd estimate that you'd need to begin with at least 10 individuals, 5 males and 5 females.maddawg IAJI said:If it is only two people, Repopulation is out of the question. Not a big enough Gene Pool. You'd need a good number of people to make a sustainable population and even then, that wouldn't last forever.
As I said above, while I don't believe it, Adam and Eve were meant to be physicaly perfect no defects to come out during inbreeding. Thousands of years of background radiation and chromosome mismatchs would eventually lead to these surfacing but by then they'd have several generations removed from each other.Dorian6 said:I must agree with the first post. Despite what the Bible tells us, two humans is too few to propagate a viable population. First rule of genetics; you have to spread the genes apart otherwise it leads to homozygosity. After a couple generations, you'll be left with offspring with such severe mental and physical retardation that they'll be lucky if they can chew their own food (see Charles II of Spain).
What about Noah's Ark? In that case an all-knowing deity, instead of fixing people, decided to mercilessly kill all but one family. And that family was only saved because they dedicated their mortal lives to the loving worship of a genocidal deity.maddawg IAJI said:I think if an all knowing deity existed, then the disaster wouldn't have happened in the first place xDKaboose the Moose said:Though if some major religions are to be believed then perhaps the last two people on earth could make like Adam & Eve 2.0 and hope an all-knowing and all-powerful deity can sort shit out.maddawg IAJI said:The 3rd Generation of offspring would most likely be mentally disabled unless you could find another person to mate with. There isn't even a real gurante that your offspring would survive given the conditions and if you lack the training to deliver said baby safely.Kaboose the Moose said:Shag first. Consequences be damned!
Also repopulating the world with only two people means that the subsequent generations will have a similar gene pool. That's just not a good idea in an evolutionary perspective.