If this post came around two months later I guarantee I'd be here talking about the Green Lantern movie.
I actually meant to quote silver wolf.ZeroMachine said:As someone pointed out, I think you meant to quote me- and to explain, Halo's story was always praised- by fans, writers, and the creators alike- that there was only ONE canon. There were some issues, but book, comic, movie, and game were all the same universe. That's why so many fans were pissed.
I dunno, the WonderCon footage looks pretty good. Here's hoping they don't just totally fuck it up.TheSchizoid said:If this post came around two months later I guarantee I'd be here talking about the Green Lantern movie.
They had super strength in the movie?! I need to re-watch that. I loved it, and I loved the novel. The change to the ending was understandable, the ending from the book was a little weird and would have had people wtf'ing.RedEyesBlackGamer said:My god, Watchmen. I hated the movie. Absolutely hated it. All because I kept pointing out flaws and exaggerations (They do NOT have super strength!). And I called bullshit on the ending. Decent movie, crap adaptation (for me) that ruined it.silver wolf009 said:snip
I should say superhumen traits. The Rorschach and Police scene comes to mind. He sprang his ankle jumping out of the build in the comic, in the movie he landed and got up to fight again (doing more than he should have). Adrian was portrayed as having superhuman reflexes in the assassin scene. Just little inconsistencies.Actual said:They had super strength in the movie?! I need to re-watch that. I loved it, and I loved the novel. The change to the ending was understandable, the ending from the book was a little weird and would have had people wtf'ing.RedEyesBlackGamer said:My god, Watchmen. I hated the movie. Absolutely hated it. All because I kept pointing out flaws and exaggerations (They do NOT have super strength!). And I called bullshit on the ending. Decent movie, crap adaptation (for me) that ruined it.silver wolf009 said:snip
That too. What I hate about that is Bioware had a chance to explain the change from Mass Effect 1's overheating to Mass Effect 2's ammo clips. I was pissed off when got picked up a weapon at the beginning of the game and said "There's no heat sync" (or something along those lines), and Miranda just told you "There's one." I was expecting some kind of explanation from Miranda on how the galaxy standard for ammunition changed to heat clips while Shepard was dead or something. Since after all a character waking up 2 years later is a perfect time to come up with any explanations you want.RedEyesBlackGamer said:While we are on that, the retcon of the way guns work. Ammo clips aren't progress, it was regressing. And why were some squad mates not wearing armor? Especially in environments exposed to Space.Dango said:Mass Effect 2 (especially its DLC).
All the times my conversation options were limited to "being an asshole" despite choosing the Paragon path. And don't even get me started on the instances Shepard would say something completely out of character without at least giving me a chance to choose a dialog option.
explain?ZeroMachine said:Halo: Reach until I learned more details about the backstory.
Anyone who hasn't read Halsey's Journal, but did read the Fall of Reach, and then played Reach, will HATE the ending.
Thank you for that, it was really bugging me and I had just assumed they decided to do whatever they wanted with the Reach storyline its nice to know there is at least some explanation for it.ZeroMachine said:The end of The Fall Of Reach book and the Reach game take place at the same time... in the book, Cortana is already on the Pillar of Autumn, and the PoA doesn't stop on Reach after battle- it just instantly makes the jump to Halo.silver wolf009 said:Whats wrong with the ending? I thought that it was fine... is there something I am missing?ZeroMachine said:Halo: Reach until I learned more details about the backstory.
Anyone who hasn't read Halsey's Journal, but did read the Fall of Reach, and then played Reach, will HATE the ending.
Reach retconned that by saying that not only did the PoA dock on Reach (reasonable, a quick diversion) but Cortana was also on Reach- which would have completely RUINED the ending of the Fall of Reach.
In Halsey's Journal, though, it reveals that Cortana IS on the PoA, and only a fragment of her is on Reach studying the artifact. What Noble 6 does is reunite the fragment with her core on the PoA.
This creates 3 story fanbases. Those that have only played the games, who have a complete and whole story; those that have read all the books, the journal, and played the games, and completely understand the ENTIRE story; and those that have read the books, played the games, but not read the journal, and are left with a big "wtf?"
I actually thought that they did a very good job of adapting the comic, I felt for the most part that they stayed true to the story. The Rorschach/police scene I thought worked well, though I do agree that it worked better in the comic. But I can't see a problem with the assassin scene, given that in both the comic and the film he's fast enough to catch a bulletRedEyesBlackGamer said:I should say superhumen traits. The Rorschach and Police scene comes to mind. He sprang his ankle jumping out of the build in the comic, in the movie he landed and got up to fight again (doing more than he should have). Adrian was portrayed as having superhuman reflexes in the assassin scene. Just little inconsistencies.Actual said:They had super strength in the movie?! I need to re-watch that. I loved it, and I loved the novel. The change to the ending was understandable, the ending from the book was a little weird and would have had people wtf'ing.RedEyesBlackGamer said:My god, Watchmen. I hated the movie. Absolutely hated it. All because I kept pointing out flaws and exaggerations (They do NOT have super strength!). And I called bullshit on the ending. Decent movie, crap adaptation (for me) that ruined it.silver wolf009 said:snip
That too. The Pokemon may evolve but the characters sure haven't.Revrant said:Hopefully the fact that it's drivel, rather than some contrived hat-loss and generic character exclusion?
But that was what made it so dramatic. How Nite Owl expressed disbelief, something like "even you are only human". So when he actually did it, it was very dramatic. Being portrayed like that earlier in the movie diminished that.b3nn3tt said:But I can't see a problem with the assassin scene, given that in both the comic and the film he's fast enough to catch a bulletRedEyesBlackGamer said:I should say superhumen traits. The Rorschach and Police scene comes to mind. He sprang his ankle jumping out of the build in the comic, in the movie he landed and got up to fight again (doing more than he should have). Adrian was portrayed as having superhuman reflexes in the assassin scene. Just little inconsistencies.Actual said:They had super strength in the movie?! I need to re-watch that. I loved it, and I loved the novel. The change to the ending was understandable, the ending from the book was a little weird and would have had people wtf'ing.RedEyesBlackGamer said:My god, Watchmen. I hated the movie. Absolutely hated it. All because I kept pointing out flaws and exaggerations (They do NOT have super strength!). And I called bullshit on the ending. Decent movie, crap adaptation (for me) that ruined it.silver wolf009 said:snip
Better question is why is that picture so adorable :/Redlin5 said:![]()
I haven't watched the show in soooo long. There's a reason for it.