Space Marines: They're becoming wimpier with each generation (Now with added ORK!)

Recommended Videos

BladesofReason

New member
Jul 16, 2008
248
0
0
For those arguing the MC vs. Space Marine (W40K) that fight strikes me as somewhat unfair. If we were to argue something like that it would have to be either a Spartan vs. a Space Marine (W40K) in which case I back the Space Marine (W40K) to win or Master Chief vs. Space Marine Special Character.

I don't think Master Chief could beat the likes of Lord Mephiston or heaven forbid Marneus Calgar.
 

GloatingSwine

New member
Nov 10, 2007
4,544
0
0
BladesofReason said:
I don't think Master Chief could beat the likes of Lord Mephiston or heaven forbid Marneus Calgar.
I doubt he could beat even a Veteran Sergeant, and it would take extreme luck for him to take down an ordinary Tactical Marine.

Quite simply, he doesn't have any weapons short of the SPNKR that stand a reasonable chance of denting Astartes armour, and even that's not for certain, since the standard Space Marine weapon is a .75 automatic fire RPG.

Not only that, he's at a significant disadvantage in experience, the average Space Marine having been in action for a hundred or more years thanks to their massive longevity.
 

Kadamon

New member
Feb 8, 2009
276
0
0
Wyatt said:
Kadamon said:
Personally I'm more of a Necron/Daemon/Tyranid kinda man, but hey, whats absurd to you is still the most powerful Space Marine made to this day. Your opinion does count though, and I will admit that they are a bit too "ub3r 1337 ov3rp0w3rdz" but really, thats why a lotta people like them.
i think alex is on to something, but this is very clearly just a chat about individual taste. i much prefer a smash em in the mouth in your face, kill , crush, and destroy warrior, id guess that alex doesnt. when i first watched the movie 'the terminator' i fucking hated Kyle Reese and wanted the terminator to kill them both (still do) and ill admit to a certian sympath in later movies for the 'bad' version, though not as much because the 'good' version was pretty badass still and the whole silver clay version was just kinda stupid. i REALLY like the HKs best of all. and im comfortable in saying that if Kyle Reese was the best humanity could do than we diserve to die out.

i think that the 40K space marines have about pushed the limits of what we as humans could be able to do from a purly psyical point of view and a plausable if not TOTALY realistic way. its not totaly unbelievable that we could some day create a super soldier that is 10 feet tall with 2 hearts and 4 lungs that, yes, spits acid. even their weapons dont require alot of change to accomplish, it doesnt require that we invent a whole new branch of science to give them uber guns for instiance, or even a chainsword. about the most truly outslandish aspects are psykers and the whole idea of chaos become tangable and psyical and even thats not as 'out there' as some sci-fie that people enjoy, the whole Jedi/Sith things is in its way much more unbelievable what with the 'force' having a split personality and all and cant make up its mind if its for the 'good' guys or the 'bad' guys.

it just seems to me anyhow looking at the subject froma big picture point of view that in almost any story about war or involving 'good' vrs 'evil', in short anything dealing with human nature, it allways seems that the good guys are pussys and only win beacause of either luck or truly stupid bad guys. the 40K marines win by skill, talent, and ability, the bad guys arent stupid for the most part (even the Orcs know how to wage war and win), and luck is just as much against them as for them. in short they play on a level playing field and still manage to win more often than not.

i guess what im saying is i like the Luke that beat vader in RoTJ when he kicked vaders ass in a 1 on 1 better than i did the whining sniviling little pussy in ESB, well ... that is right up untill he didnt finish him off than kill the Emperor himself. too often 'good' is the same thing as weak. i truly enjoy a 'good' hero that is atleast as strong if not THEE strongest guy in the fight. there is a reason that people like the Vader of the original star wars and didnt so much care for the lil blatt ass that was anakin in the new ones. people like respect power and how much more is their to like and respect of that power when its the 'good guys' that have it? thats the 40K space Marines.

some people however like the whole idea of rooting for the 'underdog' im just not one of those people. generaly the underdog is a looser for a reason and going through any trial hoping that luck or enemy stupidity will keep you alive and eventualy let you win is simply no substitute for a good plan and the power to kick enough ass to make it happen. .......... when an underdog 'wins' in real life its far far far more often the exception rather than the rule. when the USA beat the soviets in hocky in the 80 (was it?) olympics the thing that made that story special was because of the previous 9,000 years of getting our asses kicked. but if a hocky team pulled off a win like that every year it would become nothing special. and ultimatly i admire the soviets more, sure we got lucky once, it makes for a fine story, but whats to be admired is the soviets domination. in short i want my 'good guys' too win because they are the best among relative equils, not because of luck.
Um... well I got SOME of that statement right, some of the rest was just kinda of... typos.

Space Marines are not the good guys, they are just THE GUYS, they have a side, they think they're right, and they've got a gun to prove it. They are right and wrong at the same time.

Even the Necrons, the SOLE EVIL of the Galaxy, killing for resources and nothing else, are a bit right in their own way. They used to control the Galaxy, and they just want it back. Is that really THAT evil?
 

BladesofReason

New member
Jul 16, 2008
248
0
0
Kadamon said:
Space Marines are not the good guys, they are just THE GUYS, they have a side, they think they're right, and they've got a gun to prove it. They are right and wrong at the same time.

Even the Necrons, the SOLE EVIL of the Galaxy, killing for resources and nothing else, are a bit right in their own way. They used to control the Galaxy, and they just want it back. Is that really THAT evil?
The Necrons never truly controlled the galaxy, they fought a running war with the Old Ones, who in desperation spam created races in the hopes of defeating them. This resulted in the creation of the Eldar and the Orks, the former drove the Necrons to a severely weakened state.

The coming of the alien Enslavers was the last straw, causing the Old Ones to lose control of their created races and forcing the Necrons into hibernation until the universe could realistically sustain them again.

I suppose, though, that in a very "I need sustenance and the other mortal races are what I eat" sort of way the Necrons can be called "right"
 

Wyatt

New member
Feb 14, 2008
384
0
0
scumofsociety said:
Ripped off from Dune nothing, other than being in space it's ripped of from christianity & history. I'd challege you to find anything that hadn't been done before in some capacity.
there is quite alot thats the same really. they both are an empire of humanity in space, they both are controlled more or less buy great 'guilds', they have superhuman emperor's with powerful mental abilities, even the guilds are more or less the same, the 'spacing guild' in dune is the equilivent to the "Adeptus Mechanicus" and the "Bene Gesserit" are the rough equilivent to the "Inquisition", first the Sardaukar and then the fremen are of corse the Adeptus Astartes.

corse there is a total lack of 'aliens' in Dune so that is enough of a major difference that you can say they arent at all the same. but both over arching themes are about what humanity would become if it ever came face to face with a real god like being. the inclusion of aliens in 40K just gives the wars more flavor but its about the same ultimatly. humanity looses its shit in both cases when they meet 'god'. you cant tell me that the Fremen and then the Fish speakers arent the exact same thing as the Space Marines, the only real difference is who they fight.

Michael_McCloud said:
The Space Marines in Starship Troopers actually remind me quite a bit of the Imperial Guard (down to a Chickenhawk resembling a Sentinel), so I'd actually say it's the other way around. Whereas (from what I know) the ST marines were just average guys with big guns, the 40K Marines are 10-foot tall religious fanatics that are biologically enhanced to resemble an epitome of mankind and are operated on to do everything from interface with their armor more efficiently to spit acid (no joke [http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Creation_of_a_Space_Marine]). The 40K SMs have guns usually wielded by a two-man team that shoots exploding radioactive bullets. Space marines almost never die, and the ones that do (redshirts notwithstanding) are turned into great mechanical sarcophagi armed with flamethrowers and laser cannons.

Oh, and see also 1987 (40k) Vs. 1997 (ST). Vs. Doom (1993). I think we rather win.
for perhaps the 20th time, when we are speaking about the Starship Troopers its in referance too the BOOK not that crapastick movie, in the Book the ST's had suits of powered armor, fought for the most part in smallish groups (they took on an entire planet with a platoon) the suits were described as being more or less more powerful and capable than a 20th century main battle tank, and they used tactical nukes as RPGs along with flamers, guns, mini bombs, chemical weapons of all kinds and so on. kinda the same thing as a Space Marine except the Space Marines arent wearing a tank they ARE the tank and their armor is just that, armor. the starship troopers are just normal average men inside walking tanks. something like a mechwarrior.

Kadamon said:
Um... well I got SOME of that statement right, some of the rest was just kinda of... typos.

Space Marines are not the good guys, they are just THE GUYS, they have a side, they think they're right, and they've got a gun to prove it. They are right and wrong at the same time.

Even the Necrons, the SOLE EVIL of the Galaxy, killing for resources and nothing else, are a bit right in their own way. They used to control the Galaxy, and they just want it back. Is that really THAT evil?
yeah i pointed that out in my last reply to alex. i use the terms 'good' and 'evil' not in any meta sense like God and Satan, but rather from the point of view that we as humans would naturaly see ourselves and our millitary as Good and the enemy as evil.

as i said to alex perhaps i should have said US vrs THEM instead of Good vrs Evil. that avoids moral questions and gets right to the core of the matter.

in case anyone is wondering i got my information about 40K mainly from http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Categories

ive read a few of the dan abnet books and played Dawn Of war and as i said i had a buddy that played the table top game but taht wiki is my main source of information. if im wrong dont blame me blame them *snickers*
 

Zykon TheLich

Extra Heretical!
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
3,506
850
118
Country
UK
Wyatt said:
scumofsociety said:
Ripped off from Dune nothing, other than being in space it's ripped of from christianity & history. I'd challege you to find anything that hadn't been done before in some capacity.
there is quite alot thats the same really. they both are an empire of humanity in space, they both are controlled more or less buy great 'guilds', they have superhuman emperor's with powerful mental abilities, even the guilds are more or less the same, the 'spacing guild' in dune is the equilivent to the "Adeptus Mechanicus" and the "Bene Gesserit" are the rough equilivent to the "Inquisition", first the Sardaukar and then the fremen are of corse the Adeptus Astartes.

corse there is a total lack of 'aliens' in Dune so that is enough of a major difference that you can say they arent at all the same. but both over arching themes are about what humanity would become if it ever came face to face with a real god like being. the inclusion of aliens in 40K just gives the wars more flavor but its about the same ultimatly. humanity looses its shit in both cases when they meet 'god'. you cant tell me that the Fremen and then the Fish speakers arent the exact same thing as the Space Marines, the only real difference is who they fight.
I've never read dune, my point is that most of these things existed anyway. The Inquisition seems a lot like say...the inquisiton, space marines seem a lot like templars to me. The ecclesiarchy...don't need to point this out I hope. Empires & space based fiction existed before Dune. The loss of technology etc seems too much like the collapse of the roman empire and the onset of the dark ages with the current Imperial period being the middle ages.

I see 40k as more a case of 'what if the world really was stalked by demons' not what would happen if we came face to face with a god like being. Humanity lost it's shit when it turned psychic and got attacked by daemons, not when the emporer appeared (or is that not what you meant?) If you meant humanity lost its shit when the emporer died and went all inquisition on itself, then theres a historical precedent. A hell of a lot of people believe humanity has come into contact with the son of God...The big E being compared to the big JC is a fairly common one.

Sure, a couple of bits probably were pinched from Dune...and Star Wars, and Starship Troopers and Judge Dredd and Isaac Asimov and H.G.Wells and Lord of the Rings and Jules Verne and George Orwell and Greek Mythology and Judeo chritian mythos and Norse myths, Arthurian legend and any event in history etc etc etc.

You might as well say Woody McBride was ripping off Kraftwerk. By the the time he came around it was just techno.
 

Crudler

New member
Jun 2, 2008
226
0
0
After an incredibly long, daunting and undoubtedly 'nerdy' read, after dissecting every little bit of knowledge given here and with my knowledge of all the Universes mentioned here I have one thing to say about the opinion of MC winning a fight against the 40K Space Marine.
(Retrospectively looking of course that was more than one point)

What the hell? Some other post lost to the depths said about putting a single bullet through the head of a Space Marine, unlikely that'd work, I mean given the fact they can bloody well repair wounds and it was only really the more veteran marines that removed their helmets so they'd be unlikely to go and get shot be a sniper.

MC and the whole Halo franchise (I've been an avid fan of the 40K and Halo 'universes') just seem so, well fake and almost 'silly'.
Halo was made just as a game to entertain people, they weren't meant to read into the lore behind it really. 40K started in the days of D & D and other such RPGs, people liked reading into them and look at how everything has grown since then lore wise.

I read a Halo book once that I borrowed from a friend, It was awful, I mean I really did not enjoy it. I've set the literary standards for myself pretty high but I absolutely hated it. The 40K books weren't of the highest quality but they were more grim and morbid and that counterpoised it and made it better as well as many of reasons.

Finally, (about bloody time, written far too much that I doubt will be read but anyway) Space Marines are pretty damn agile too. Just because they're 10/12ft tall doesn't mean they lumber about oh no, besides if you naysayers still don't believe that I leave you with this closing thought; Assault squads of Space Marines, ordinary Space Marines but with Jet packs, Chainswords and many other fun extras.

(Retrospectively looking that was more than one point)
 

santaandy

New member
Sep 26, 2008
535
0
0
I got really turned on by the hot redhead space marine lady in Starship Troopers 2. Just seeing a tough lady with a snarky attitude, a cigar in her mouth, and a big gun in her hands really made me want to torch off a few rounds, if you know what I mean. :)

I think we have started seeing a lot more "tough ladies" in entertainment, and it seems to be particularly obvious with space marines. As I recall, there were more than a few ladies in Halo, weren't there?
 

keyton777

New member
Aug 14, 2008
380
0
0
RAKais said:
keyton777 said:
wow it kept going
if the giant marine has a head (i hope to god he does) then logically sniping him in the had would kill him, yes?
i dotn give a crap about halo or 40k, point is ur placing a guy that was trained to kill lots of enemies his size (which is human incase you missed who im refering to) with teammates that are just as fast and just as strong as he is, throwing him at a 12ft tall guy wrapped in armor in a melee fight wouldnt make much sense,
and personally i dont think a marine would need to get close to the giant guy, even a normal one, a single air strike and the big guy has a fair sized hole in him if they dropped more than a few bullets and a single artillery shell on him from long range.

c-130 gunship, or a futureistic equivalent
marines dont fight without some kind of air cover, just incase a tank or in this case a 12ft tall freak happend to walk by.

id like to point out that a plasma based weapon would pretty much melt what ever it touched, so if cheif had the plasme sword he really would only have to throw it at the guys leg

and to somethin someone said about the 12ft tall marines being fast, your kidding your self, that guy would have to get hundreds of pounds of flesh and metal moving inorder to dodge something, and that isnt something done quickly
Sorry, i hope i dont sound rude but a space marines armour to him is as light as his own skin. I agree MC would win.
true hadnt thought about the training part, my bad, and thanks
 

Kadamon

New member
Feb 8, 2009
276
0
0
Ahem, plasma RIFLES also known as burnas (if I'm correct) are held by Space Marines. Now a plasa sword and pistol... against a plasma RIFLE plus all of the OTHER stuff they have... well, Master Chief doesn't have a chance.

Did I mention Orbital Bombardment?
 

Alex_P

All I really do is threadcrap
Mar 27, 2008
2,712
0
0
Wyatt said:
as i said to alex perhaps i should have said US vrs THEM instead of Good vrs Evil. that avoids moral questions and gets right to the core of the matter.
But it's what "US" are doing to us that I'm talking about. The whole screwed-up society that just throws people away.

I want the heroes to somehow rebel against the inherent fucked-up-ness of their grimdark crapsack world, not just kill kill kill kill kill kill kill(*) in the Emperor's name. I don't care if it's futile. It's the human thing to do.

-- Alex
__________
* - This one time, I will actually give people "points" or "cookies" or whatever for catching the obscure reference.
 

Wyatt

New member
Feb 14, 2008
384
0
0
scumofsociety said:
I have to admit I've never read dune, my point is that most of these things existed anyway. The Inquisition seems a lot like say...the inquisiton, space marines seem a lot like templars to me. The ecclesiarchy...don't need to point this out I hope. The loss of technology etc seems too much like the collapse of the roman empire and the onset of the dark ages/middle ages.

I see 40k as more a case of 'what if the world really was stalked by demons' not what would happen if we came face to face with a god like being. Humanity lost it's shit when it turned psychic and got attacked by daemons, not when the emporer appeared (or is that not what you meant?) If you meant humanity lost its shit when the emporer died and went all inquisition on itself, then theres a historical precedent. A hell of a lot of people believe humanity has come into contact with the son of God...The big E being compared to the big JC is a fairly common one.

Sure, a couple of bits probably were pinched from Dune...and Star Wars, and Starship Troopers and Judge Dredd and Isaac Asimov and H.G.Wells and Lord of the Rings and Jules Verne and George Orwell and Greek Mythology and Judeo chritian mythos and Norse myths and any event in history etc etc etc.
its a semi lose connection, Dune is a truly epic story, 40K is pretty cool but nothing like a 'classic' that Dune is. and ill agree with you from your more in depth reply. ive read as ive said thousands of storys of all kinds and it sometime seems there truly IS nothing 'new'. its all been done before depending on how you view it. but there IS a connection between Dune and 40K and not just a minor one.

the god thing ........ well the emperor IS god to the 40K humans. thats what i ment when i said humanity lost their shit. its one thing to worship a god that isnt setting on a throne someplace issuing commands on a daily basis and something quite else when god shows up in the flesh and starts talking to you on the 6 o'clock news. thats another and perhaps the BIGGEST connection with Dune. Dune is about mankind breeding a 'god'. a man with the ability to see the future. if you really think about that concept its actualy about the closest thing we humans COULD get to BEING a god. how much of an advantage would a human who knows the future be, how could anyone who couldnt see the future possable compeat with him? he would BE a god when compared to a normal human. much like the emperor in 40K


it would be much like how the world would react of Jesus DID show up next week and said "lookit we need to form an army to fight all muslems" do you think that any Christian wouldnt lose their fucking mind and NOT run off to join gods army? when your fighting for god himself you CANT be wrong ....... or so the thinking would go. just like the 40k 'cults' act.

anyhow since you havent read dune, and i would encourage you to do so, about half of what im talking about here will be missed by you. not at all saying your ignorant or wrong. im just drawing conclusions about the topic based on information and concepts that are covered much greater in depth in Dune than in the 40K stuff. you make connections with the crusades, your supposed too, it IS the crusades in space 40 thousands years from now, but my point about the role that religion playes visa vie the emperor in 40k is informed by the role that the emperor played in Dune thats all.


Crudler said:
Finally, (about bloody time, written far too much that I doubt will be read but anyway) Space Marines are pretty damn agile too. Just because they're 10/12ft tall doesn't mean they lumber about oh no,
ive avoided the other 'side' of this thread to date because its mostly silly. but THIS point i see repeated is perhaps the most ignorant.

'agility' is based on a persons strength, the stronger you are the more agile you are. im talking about the power required to move a certian mass in a given direction in a certian time at a given gravity. the STRONGER a person is the more agile they are the faster they can do all those things i just listed. just dont confuse muscle mass with strength either, there is a difference. muscle density is much more importiant than muscle mass in this topic.

after all superman is faster than a speeding bullet and that is due to his strength and his muscle density, he packs much more strength in his muscles than of the same mass than normal humans do (its also what makes him bullet proof). if you took a human being, and made him so he could move on a planet with a 10k X earth gravity field he would BE superman. put that same being in a suit of Space marine armor and make him 10 feet tall and well, you have space marines. or atleast thats how i understand it.

but in any case its just flat out wrong to confuse size with agility. all things are in relation to one another. in Japan my 6'2" is abnormal but id be willing to bet im just as agile as most japaneese 6" shorter and 50 lbs lighter than i am. and in America where im from there are average people LARGER than i am that are MUCH more agile. hell just look at any football player at 6'6" and 350 lbs that can chase down any 'normal' person thats only 5'5" and 180 lbs. and totaly kick his ass when he catches him.

now i know nothing about Halo, nothing at all so i dont care to chose sides in this lil pissing contest, but this idea that smaller = more agile is just dumb and not true to boot.

Alex_P said:
Wyatt said:
as i said to alex perhaps i should have said US vrs THEM instead of Good vrs Evil. that avoids moral questions and gets right to the core of the matter.
But it's what "US" are doing to us that I'm talking about. The whole screwed-up society that just throws people away.

I want the heroes to somehow rebel against the inherent fucked-up-ness of their grimdark crapsack world, not just kill kill kill kill kill kill kill(*) in the Emperor's name. I don't care if it's futile. It's the human thing to do.

-- Alex
__________
* - This one time, I will actually give people "points" or "cookies" or whatever for catching the obscure reference.
no cookie for me i dont know the referance but i like the space marines just as they are. they know what they are fighting for and do it. right or wrong. i agree that there is a place for morality thats what the inquisition is for. thats where you get your fill of the moral delemas, but the space marines leave all that aside and just get to the killing.

ive had some experiance with this in real life. i can speak from experiance about actual combat. i dont often bring this point up because making a clame on the internet like this is like fucking for virginity. i can offer no proof but my writen words. but should you accept my clame than i will say with some degree of 'official' opinion that when the shooting starts and combat is joined than moral questions loose all meaning. you can decide whos right and whos wrong when the guns go silent. thats why i enjoy how the space marines are put forward. what you call hokey and over the top, people that have been involved in real combat see something to be admired. real combat IS over the top and when your diving head first into a ditch because there is mortar or rocket shells incoming if your first responce isnt too shoot back (or kill kill kill as you put it) than you wont live long. in war there is no room for good or evil, 'right' or 'wrong' there is US and there is THEM and who ever is alive at the end can write the next book of morality.

as Jackie Fisher (a cookie if you can tell me who he was) once said (roughly) "speaking of humanizing war is stupid, you may as well speak of humanizing hell". i dont want my warriors to think, i want them to kill, leave the thinking up to those back home that have the leasure warriors provide to waste on thoughts of morality or change. on the battle front i want single minded commitment to killing your enemys. all else = lose.

ill also add this. what humans can accept for morality is in a direct relationship with what their enemys will do too them should they loose. for example orwells 1984 is a PRIME example of what im saying, if you have read it you will understand my point totaly. sure life is bad in the human universe in 40K but it would be much much much worse should chaos win. all things are Relative. what my point is that should you actualy LIVE there you might in fact think that the space marines ARE heros, you yourself under the pressures of living in that society my not only accept them but actualy SUPPORT them especialy given your alternatives should they loose. you can 'change' that society AFTER the threat is dealt with but not before.

see my point?
 

Zykon TheLich

Extra Heretical!
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
3,506
850
118
Country
UK
Wyatt said:
but my point about the role that religion playes visa vie the emperor in 40k is informed by the role that the emperor played in Dune thats all.
Thats probably a fair point, as I haven't read dune I'll have to take your word for it, although divine rulers as a concept have been around since the Pharoes and IIRC the Japanese emporers were considered to be divine, even if they didn't have any real life kewl powerz, they sure had some fanatically loyal followers. True, you could say that really the Japanese emporers were basically just figureheads a lot of the time and the various lords and such running the show, but then the big E hasn't given an order for 10K years, it's the high lords of Terra that run things in the 40K hood.

Of course your meant to make connections with the cruades...they couldn't have made the connection with medieval Europe/Christianity any clearer if they'd tried. Which they probably did. Very hard. Heck 40K's fantasy precursor virtually was medieval europe, albeit with a bunch of gods rather than 1.

Also, I cannot believe I forgot Michael Moorcock.
 

Alex_P

All I really do is threadcrap
Mar 27, 2008
2,712
0
0
Wyatt said:
when the shooting starts and combat is joined than moral questions loose all meaning. you can decide whos right and whos wrong when the guns go silent.
But when the battle's over they still don't stop and think. They're glorified stormtroopers, y'know?

-- Alex
 

Bulletinmybrain

New member
Jun 22, 2008
3,277
0
0
Alex_P said:
Wyatt said:
when the shooting starts and combat is joined than moral questions loose all meaning. you can decide whos right and whos wrong when the guns go silent.
But when the battle's over they still don't stop and think. They're glorified stormtroopers, y'know?

-- Alex
Well of course they stop and think, about how right and just they are. ;)
 

Fightgarr

Concept Artist
Dec 3, 2008
2,913
0
0
Okay, I guess I can agree with the Space Marine points you have. The ork/orc becoming wimpier though? I call shenanigans! Orcs were invented by our good friend Tolkien. The orcs of Middle Earth were essentially horribly mutated and horribly corrupted elves, they were not 8 ft. tall hulking greenskins which grew from fungi. Warhammer then took Tolkien's orc and made the ork, technically a butchering of the concept, but nevertheless they made it their own.

Another thing I would like to call shenanigans on is that Space Marines and Orks started like that. Have you looked at the 1st and 2nd edition versions of the Orks and the Space Marines. A bit more toned down than now. Not much, but enough so that I can argue that your trend is a little off. In particular, the Space Marines of 40K still exist and are still hard as fuck. So I call shenanigans again! Again I say!
 

Zykon TheLich

Extra Heretical!
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
3,506
850
118
Country
UK
Alex_P said:
Wyatt said:
when the shooting starts and combat is joined than moral questions loose all meaning. you can decide whos right and whos wrong when the guns go silent.
But when the battle's over they still don't stop and think. They're glorified stormtroopers, y'know?

-- Alex
The battle will never be over. The enemy is the corrupt heart of mankind, the enemy is us.
 

Alex_P

All I really do is threadcrap
Mar 27, 2008
2,712
0
0
scumofsociety said:
The battle will never be over. The enemy is the corrupt heart of mankind, the enemy is us.
The Imperium is the enemy, too. They're cutting out the heart of mankind.

Indoctrinated killers killing their enemies bore the hell out of me. That's a platform that's just begging for a tilt -- but the tilt never comes!

This works fine for a wargame where you're the guy shepherding the little minis around and enjoying the grimdark crapsack-world feeling without actually turning it into a clear storyline. But when you turn it into narrative, when you really try to explore their Space-Marine-ness, there's nothing there, because they're too busy being buffed-up indoctrinated kill-beasts to sleep or eat or talk or fucking live.

-- Alex
 

Zykon TheLich

Extra Heretical!
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
3,506
850
118
Country
UK
Alex_P said:
The Imperium is the enemy, too. They're cutting out the heart of mankind.

Indoctrinated killers killing their enemies bore the hell out of me. That's a platform that's just begging for a tilt -- but the tilt never comes!

This works fine for a wargame where you're the guy shepherding the little minis around and enjoying the grimdark crapsack-world feeling without actually turning it into a clear storyline. But when you turn it into narrative, when you really try to explore their Space-Marine-ness, there's nothing there, because they're too busy being buffed-up indoctrinated kill-beasts to sleep or eat or talk or fucking live.

-- Alex
Absolutely, that's the point, the Imperium of man is one colossal clusterfuck. If the Imperium doesn't cut the heart out of mankind, then demons made out of mankinds own psyche will. Whichever way you look, the choices aint so good.

You want interesting, go Inquisition, it's pretty much taken as given that the marines are a bunch of boring characterless killbots. Unless you look at the older stuff. Deathwing was kinda cool, as was Space Marine by Ian Watson, but that was early 90's fluff.

Incidentally there were some human good guys in 40k in the early fluff (and rules briefly) but they've been written out AFAIK. The Sensei were the emporers children (unbeknownst to them and him) that he'd fathered over the millenia and went around being all good and Jedi like.