Cody211282 said:
Well I hate to say it but of course they are going to say that, if they come out and say "well we have this game we are making, it's not quite done yet, but we are going to charge you $60 for the first part then you can buy the rest as we make it as well" do you think people would honestly buy the damn thing? This goes under PR not wanting a clusterfuck of bad press about their game.
Or perhaps they're being truthful and you're just letting cynicism get in the way? Blizzard are a solid developer who've not steered me wrong before, I don't see why they'd start now despite their new relationship with Activision, who I'll readily admit to disliking a great deal.
Cody211282 said:
And I don't like it because I'm not getting a full game, and then I'm expected to shell out $60 for something that's not a collectors edition.
But you 'are' getting a full game, or so everything I've read has led me to believe. Previous Blizzard games have had expansions, and in each case the expansions simply added onto an already fantastic game. Why should it be any different this time? Will there be the same uproar when the inevitable first Diablo 3 expansion pack is announced?
If the original game is a solid and entertaining experience, I see no reason not to buy it. And if I know there are expansions in the works that will improve the experience further, then power to them. I bought Dawn of War knowing there would be many expansion packs, same with Dawn of War 2. Just because a game will be improved later, doesn't mean it can't be good
now.
But the game isn't even out yet so who knows? I
hope I'm right and you're wrong, but there's no way to know till it's on shelves.
In the meantime I'll agree that we disagree, which is fine with me. If everyone agreed on everything this'd be one helluva boring world, and although I'm optimistic this time, there's no telling what's coming in the future. Maybe you'll find yourself defending a game against me? Hah! Oughta be fun!