Yeah I know that.bdcjacko said:Sign me up for the SSV Hot Cakes sailor. We will win this war in style!GrizzlerBorno said:No, you're right, those battles are, strategically and historically very similar. I'm just talking about the cultural ramifications. As in, Is it fair to call Alamo a "defeat" when the prevailing side is still alive and kicking.
Instead of calling it Thermopylae, I could go with what they said in the 300 movie: Not Thermopylae, but "Hot Gates"......which sounds like "Hot cakes"
...and let's be honest here, who wouldn't wanna fly an "Interstellar warship called Hot Cakes"!
Also, can't help it, but Thermopylae is Greek for Hot Gates, what is why they keep calling it that in 300.
Hey, how can he complain that we took his decent thread and made it fabulous!!!!!GrizzlerBorno said:Yeah I know that.
And, okay, sure. You can be my first mate: Corporal Muffin pie!
Okay I think we should stop now before OP reports us for some ridiculous derailing.... X)
bdcjacko said:SNIP
Thank you gentlemen for your contributions!GrizzlerBorno said:SNIP
In the empty frictionless void of space, what is the purpose of sleek? I recall seeing something, maybe History Channel's the Universe, where they hypothetically came up with might as well be cubes with directional thrusters and maybe some sort of gyroscopic cockpit that would turn the direction you decided was the front. They proposed that would be the most agile and quickest, but it wouldn't look sleek.Hero in a half shell said:I think I would have something about half the size of the millenium falcon, small and sleek, built for manouverability and speed, able to carry maybe 4 people at most, It would be used for domestic purposes but able to function as a fighter in an instant, armed to the teeth with lasers, and I would name it "Pegasus"
Why yes it is mine, thanks. More of my and other escapist users miniatures can be seen here:Generic Gamer said:Actually I think that's a picture taken by a user here, nice cruiser Scumofsociety!
I honestly have never thought of that before, I suppose it would be for when it has to enter atmospheres of other worlds, after all, you need a sleek craft if you want to bulleye wamp rats in Beggars canyon, and they're not much bigger than two metres!bdcjacko said:In the empty frictionless void of space, what is the purpose of sleek? I recall seeing something, maybe History Channel's the Universe, where they hypothetically came up with might as well be cubes with directional thrusters and maybe some sort of gyroscopic cockpit that would turn the direction you decided was the front. They proposed that would be the most agile and quickest, but it wouldn't look sleek.Hero in a half shell said:I think I would have something about half the size of the millenium falcon, small and sleek, built for manouverability and speed, able to carry maybe 4 people at most, It would be used for domestic purposes but able to function as a fighter in an instant, armed to the teeth with lasers, and I would name it "Pegasus"
Not that you have a bad idea, just thinking out loud so to speak.
Stealth cruiser form of ship called the "Turbulent night"The .50 Caliber Cow said:Congradulations! You are now captain of your very own ship![footnote]You can decide faction and style/class of ship on your own.[/footnote] What do you call her?
I call mine Kalis after the sword. It would be a long, slightly curved ship with stealth abilities. Mostly a close range fighting ship. I wouldn't serve with any fleet, I'd be a renegade Captain of a private smuggling operation. Completely stealth black.
Anyway, your turn!
Wait, you kill small animals for fun? That is a warning sign for a serial killer.Hero in a half shell said:I honestly have never thought of that before, I suppose it would be for when it has to enter atmospheres of other worlds, after all, you need a sleek craft if you want to bulleye wamp rats in Beggars canyon, and they're not much bigger than two metres!
Well, A man can dream. I want my fighter spaceship to look cool and badass, and if that means making it aerodynamic and sleek, then that's fine by me (It's not like I'm ever actually going to design a combat ready, interplanetary shuttle... or am I?)bdcjacko said:Wait, you kill small animals for fun? That is a warning sign for a serial killer.Hero in a half shell said:I honestly have never thought of that before, I suppose it would be for when it has to enter atmospheres of other worlds, after all, you need a sleek craft if you want to bulleye wamp rats in Beggars canyon, and they're not much bigger than two metres!
But yeah, the properties of a good spaceship and the properties of a plane are different. And landing/taking off vehicle would be a different craft all together.