Stealth or Splosions

Recommended Videos

HolocaustBoy

New member
Nov 11, 2010
166
0
0
If you could pick between being stealthy or blowing shit up. what would it be and why?

Stealth because it is more efficient.
 

hittite

New member
Nov 9, 2009
1,681
0
0
Stealth in, lay charges, stealth out, watch the pretty explosions.

Lawn chairs and tequila may also be involved.

Who says you can't have both?
 

Free Thinker

New member
Apr 23, 2010
1,332
0
0
Stealth. Michael Bay explosions give away your position and alerts a base/army, thus bringing more troops and lowering the chance of success. Besides, stealth leaves a psychological fear in the rank and file, that they are being picked off one by one, and there's no safety. Anywhere.
 

Tartarga

New member
Jun 4, 2008
3,649
0
0
Both. Explosions are always more surprising if you have no idea where there coming from or whats causing them.
 

DiMono

New member
Mar 18, 2010
837
0
0
Stealth because it demands finesse. There's no skill required in blowing shit up, but there's lots of skill required in not being seen.
 

Xpwn3ntial

Avid Reader
Dec 22, 2008
8,023
0
0
hittite said:
Stealth in, lay charges, stealth out, watch the pretty explosions.

Lawn chairs and tequila may also be involved.

Who says you can't have both?
I say.

OT: Stealth, so I know if the job was done or not.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
Stealthy explosions.

The trick is to be the sort of mad bomber character who delivers explosives or, in fact, snipes with missle launchers unexpectedly. There is a perfect medium to be found here.
 

JPH330

Blogger Person
Jan 31, 2010
397
0
0
Stealth, mostly because it makes me feel like a ninja and I think ninjas are total badasses.
 

tthor

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,931
0
0
Stealth. Anyone can chuck a grenade into a room and hope it kills something; but to sneak into that room without detection, and take out the several guards before any of them even knew he was there, that is art. It is precise, it is quiet, it does not draw attention to itself, it is deadly, it is just beautiful.

explosions are unnecessarily reckless and inefficient. If you use an explosion to take out an enemy, you are putting yourself and other pedestrians at risk, and you can't even be sure that what you tried to blow up is dead when the explosion goes off; its not like you could actually watch the person get blown up, and if you were stupid enough to watch the explosion rather than get cover, you probably got a piece of shrapnel thru your eye. but if you assassinate someone, you'll know for sure that that man is dead, because that stealth killer's very job requires him to be precise.
 

Souplex

Souplex Killsplosion Awesomegasm
Jul 29, 2008
10,312
0
0
If you need to hide in order to kill things you don't deserve to kill things and should probably have your limbs revoked because you can't use them responsibly.
 

ultrachicken

New member
Dec 22, 2009
4,303
0
0
Souplex said:
If you need to hide in order to kill things you don't deserve to kill things and should probably have your limbs revoked because you can't use them responsibly.
And if you have to use vastly superior weapons than your targets to get a kill, then you ought to have your limbs revoked because you can't use them responsibly.
 

loc978

New member
Sep 18, 2010
4,900
0
0
I hate choosing... I like to stealth in and lase for or plant the 'splosion makers.
 

tthor

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,931
0
0
Souplex said:
If you need to hide in order to kill things you don't deserve to kill things and should probably have your limbs revoked because you can't use them responsibly.
and if you can't aim well enough that you have to use a huge blast just to hit your target, then you ought to have your limbs revoked because you can't use them responsibly.

What was it online FPSs call grenade launchers? "Noob tubes"? That's because ANYONE can fire a grenade and hit something, it doesn't take much skill.