Jerry Pendleton said:Yeah I am not too sure my friend.DasDestroyer said:They haven't tainted rule 34 yet...Gigaguy64 said:ಠ_ಠ
Im...just....wow...
What haven't those freaking poniestaintedtouched?
SomeBritishDude said:Hahahaha, Oh innocence.DasDestroyer said:They haven't tainted rule 34 yet...Gigaguy64 said:ಠ_ಠ
Im...just....wow...
What haven't those freaking poniestaintedtouched?
FYI Do not type any Pony name into google without safe search on.
And the other post which I will not quote...Gigaguy64 said:Oh you're dead wrong on that one bro.DasDestroyer said:They haven't tainted rule 34 yet...Gigaguy64 said:ಠ_ಠ
Im...just....wow...
What haven't those freaking poniestaintedtouched?
That isn't what I meant by "Ponies not having tainted rule 34", after all we all know that if it exists, rule 34 applies, I meant that ponies have not yet infiltrated rule 34...
"If it exists, there is ponies of it"
Or something of the sort.
I guess I should have made that clearer.