Hell yeah! that and I'm not into (insert genre here).Gigaguy64 said:Graphics, the main character looks weird, and its on *insert system here*.
I try not to get mad anymore, to me it their loss.
Hell yeah! that and I'm not into (insert genre here).Gigaguy64 said:Graphics, the main character looks weird, and its on *insert system here*.
I try not to get mad anymore, to me it their loss.
Awwwww, but I like games on the Wii and DS. I like all of the systems. As long as the game is good I can get used to what system it is on. Though I admit, some games on the Wii, normally gun games I can stand with the controller for it.Lord Mountbatten Reborn said:Platform supremacy just ain't cool kids.Disaster Button said:Anyhoo, the stupidest reason I've heard from someone is that a game isn't good if its on the PC, he disappointed me into a week long coma.
Although in retrospect, my stupid reasons to shoot down games usually involve the game being on the Wii/DS. But I don't differentiate between the whole PC/360/PS3 shebang.
Well, honestly, I agree with IGN for once. It's just a standard for games to, if they have multiplayer at all, include online play. And for a 4-player beat-em-up, it's just a no brainer. But I guess they were just going for the old-school arcade feel, which it absolutely maintains.Get_A_Grip_ said:IGN knock down games for the most retarded reason ever.
"It doesn't have online co-op."
I don't know that many people that play online co-op.
They knocked down Scott Pilgrim vs. The World because of that reason. Four people shouting down a mic. doesn't seem like a good idea to me IGN. ¬_¬
Well, I couldn't bring myself to like Daggerfall (I wanted to, so badly!), because the graphics were pure shite...Moontouched-Moogle said:Because it's 2D, early-and-blocky 3D, or because it's just plain old.
Graphics aren't a very big deal. Graphics don't make the game.
Well, to each his own.lacktheknack said:Well, I couldn't bring myself to like Daggerfall (I wanted to, so badly!), because the graphics were pure shite...Moontouched-Moogle said:Because it's 2D, early-and-blocky 3D, or because it's just plain old.
Graphics aren't a very big deal. Graphics don't make the game.
*cough-cough*yahtzee and starcraft*cough-cough*Chicaine said:Probably because its a genre you don't like, if people dared stray out their precious comfort zone they'd be a lot better off
And hell, even in their ignorance they were wrong, GSC is Ukrainian, not Russian.individual11 said:"It's made by Russians." STALKER: Shadow of Chernobyl. There were better reasons to shoot it down. I love the game, personally.
I know what you mean. Screw 'em if they can't get past graphics.Gigaguy64 said:Graphics, the main character looks weird, and its on *insert system here*.
I try not to get mad anymore, to me it their loss.