Even then, there is contradiction. The idea of "blame Yahoo" belies the notion that the OP actually knew what it meant in the first place. nor was the OP in any way "quoting" the article.MarsProbe said:By that I mean, isn't it funny how people seemed so keen to jump in here and rat on the OP for seemingly not knowing the meaning of the word "conspiracy" that they likely failed to actually read the rest of the topic where they would have seen that this fact had already been stated a dozen times already and acknowledged by the OP.
I'm just saying, it's not so much "acknowledged" as "defended."
"Oh no, of course I know what it means. I was merely quoting the article, which was obviously erroneous, but blame Yahoo. I might know the definition but you can't expect me to apply it!"
Damn Yahoo, for conspiring against the OP!
More accurately, those "nutjobs" who thought it was in fact, a rogue planet, or that it would destroy us through STELLAR ALIGNMENT. Most of the doomsday theories had nothing to do with hitting the planet.idarkphoenixi said:Oh yeah, those "nutjobs" who thought a coment passing earth might hit us...Oooh, how crazy.
In short: Cute, but no cigar.