Of course, from a logical standpoint, one would agree with you. Of course one should receive just, lawfully-abiding punishment for a crime of animal cruelty. However, what you still fail to realize - and what is starting to irritate me, is that by trying to shoot down my standpoint, you are, in fact, siding with THEM on some standpoints.stinkychops said:So your promoting a vigilante killing/torture/assault of multiple human beings due to the death of one cat? Why?G-Virus said:Are you being serious right now? Look who needs psychiatric help.stinkychops said:You'd gladly kill an entire species, quite possibly the greatest species in the entire universe, because a few individuals hurt a worthless cat?Crazycat690 said:I would gladly kill all humans just so there wouldn't even be those few assholes around doing shit like that. Sure animals kill each other, but they didn't set fire to that cat to eat it? Those innocent human lives are worth nothing to me, animals are alot more innocent. Teens are all assholes anyway :/Talshere said:STFU! Ive had a load off in another thread about this shit. DO NOT lump in all teens and a whole pissing generation with the few assholes!hyperhammy said:What the fuck is up with everybody this generation?!
People killing pupies, kittens, raping old ladies... wtf?!
I'm sure glad you're just talking big on the internet and do not have any power over anyone.
I'll bet that you're a teenager yourself, going through the superiority issues where you're unable to contemplate the worth of even the worst human beings.
Firstly, animals are not innocent, because they have no ability to be 'evil' more any morals at all. (Except dolphins who hunt, rape and beat for fun). What's so great about innocence anyway? What does it matter if they eat it or not? Surely you'd think it worse if they did.
If you're not a teenager/acting like a misanthrope for attention, or simply in a bad place please get psychiatric help. I'm not joking. This isn't a dig. Go see a medical professional and tell them what you think about your fellow humans.
Who said that cat was worthless? What if it was YOUR cat? NO living creature should be exposed to that kind of torture.
And I agree with Crazycat690. Okay, maybe not to the extreme of killing the ENTIRE human race, but if those guys were to recieve swift, ironic justice by my hand, it would be no soil on my hardwood floors.![]()
If it was my cat then it would not be worthless, but as it stands it was either their cat, a street cat or a stolen cat. That means that it was unlikely to survive/give anyone pleasure/make more cats. So yes, it is worthless. Especially in comparison to what even one of those blokes could achieve.
Sure they should get comeupance but it should be lawful. Its all well and good having principles, but where do you draw the line if you don't stick rigidly to the law?
They killed a cat so it's okay if we get em.
They damaged my property does that make it okay to just ruff em up?
They were rude so I clocked them, is that justified?
He looked at me funny. So I killed him.
That cat pissed on my car, better burn him.
The way your opinion sounds to me is this: "The cat is worthless because it belonged to them or was stolen - therefore having little in the way of life expectancy - and so therefore it is okay, or at least reasonable, to SET THE DAMN THING ON FIRE."
And did the words "we should kill them" come from my fingers? No. What I said is that they should receive "swift, ironic justice". That could mean absolutely anything, as long as it is appropriate punishment they deserve for inflicting unnecessary torture upon a living, breathing creature. Maybe they go home, still laughing about their sick game, and while making something on the stove, some grease or something splashes up into their hair, setting it ablaze. They scream, their scalp is singed, and they come out of the situation more miserable than ever.
I NEVER promote murder as an answer, sir. Thank you very much. Unless we happen to speak on the matter of Hitler. Then yes, take the fucker down.