U235 Is The Bomb said:
SuperNova221 said:
That's a completely different context to saying "That's gay" so not a valid comparison. If you go up to somebody, or more specifically a black man, and say "You're a ******" you are activley trying to offend that person. If something bad happens and you say, in regards to the situation, "That's gay" then you are simply stating your opinion of the situation through a word that has multiple meanings. If you take offence from somebody using a different meaning of a word that could be used offensivley, then you are activley trying to victimise yourself.
Well, would you honestly describe a situation that you didn't like by saying something like "That's so black!" or "That's really chinese!"? Because the end effect is that it is still offensive.
I understand that you are not intending to be homophobic, but, alas, it's the fact that it is unintended that makes it so much more offensive. It is reflexive for someone to associate something negative with a characteristic they dislike, so saying "That's gay!" means that you, on some level, assume that being gay is negative.
Not that I'm trying to say that you are a bad person, or that you homophobic, but maybe you should take into account some other people's point of view next time you use an insult like that. Although do keep on posting your opinions, as it makes the discussion all the much deeper.
Language evolves. Only what, 60 years ago, Vera Lynn was singing "I'll be seeing you in every lovely summer's day. In everything that's light and gay." Even well before that the word gay was used almost exclusivley to indicate happiness. How often do you hear somebody use the word gay, in a non pretentious manner, with that meaning? Black is quite ambiguous, so I'll address the "That's really chinese!". I see that differently. Saying Chinese is a direct link to that group of people, there is no ambiguity in the word and it has, at least to my knowledge, always had the same meaning.
However, while the intent of the phrase "That's really chinese!" may be bad, if it was used regularly and adopted in a mainstream way, in much the say way "That's gay." has been, the word would take on it's own meaning. The origins of the phrase may have been negative. But it would have adopted it's own meaning to the point where people use it and activley acknowledge that it could be interpreted as offensive, but know that the intent they use it with isn't. I couldn't see this, or anything similar, being widely adopted like "That's gay." however due to the far less ambiguous background of the word.
In response to your second paragraph. No. I'm don't, on any level, assume that homosexuality is a negative thing. I've also made a post earlier expresisng my personal stance on the use of the word.
SuperNova221 said:
I've never really gotten into the habit of it, which is odd given the area of Scotland I was brought up in. I do however intentionally use it from time to time to time just to confuse people as it's so out of character with my usual manner of speaking. As for actually saying "That's gay." I've never had a problem with it. It does seem to be dieing out though.
It irks me that there are people who assume that those who do regularly use the phrase "That's gay" are sub conciously homophobic to some level. There, unfortunatley, will be people who use the phrase who are homophobic to some extent, but the vast majority (I hope) do acknowldge the intent and the evolution of the word and it's meaning. so that you could only really get offended by it if you make yourself the victim.
It also irks me that you needed to make the second and third paragraph at all. A simple "Saying "That's gay!" means that you, on some level, assume that being gay is negative." Would have been sufficient without all of the trying too hard to not be offensive fluff. It seemed rather condescending. Although I really shouldn't have a right to complain about that, given how hypocritical I am on the matter.
I'll also apologise if I've badly explained anything here, English is my native language but I'm not good at coordinating long posts to effectivley convey what I'm trying to say.