I have to say, I think this is the first time I've completely and honestly disagreed with Bob, in either Big Picture or Escape to the movies. I mean, we haven't always seen perfectly eye to eye (while it was definitely sub-par, I didn't hate The Expendables nearly as vehemently as you did, for instance) but I've always agreed with your general points, or at least understood where you were coming from.
But this? This is absolute garbage. I'm half expecting a "gotcha" big picture next week talking about how your really not THIS thick.
Gonna use a few examples from your bit here, and lets start with Thor. I'm assuming your Black-Thor picture was a reference to Idris Elba as Heimdall in the new Thor flick. As someone who reviews movies for a LIVING, I kinda expected a little better insight into the workings of Hollywood, but I'll lay it out for you. Hollywood didn't pick a black man for a white role because Elba fits the role perfectly or because of his great chops (don't get me wrong, loved him in Wire, not a fan of his other works though.) No. Hollywood picked a black man for a white role, in order to increase the ticket sales to black people, and as a nice added bonus, to give a little "controversy" and free publicity to the thing. The problem is, no amount of good story writing or superb acting is going to make him feel like anything more than "token black guy" in a role that he REALLY shouldn't be in. How about this: show me a movie about Shango, with the lead role going to Justin Beiber or some-such, and see the reactions you get.
Flip side: Mr Jackson as Nick Fury. Doesn't really bother me. Nothing about Fury's character seemed particularly "white" to me. Samuel L Jackson is a good actor and lends credence to the part. Plus the comic writers planned it out and did the swap well in advance, in the comics. Another one, Michael Clark Duncan as Kingpin in the Daredevil movie. Okay, so the movie wasn't all the great, but Kingpin was originally a white character. MCD fit the role in every physical way except the melanin level, plus the man is a great actor, so away you go.
And a quick deviation while I'm on the subject. Black people are black. They're not African American. Black people *WERE* African American 200 years ago when they actually came from Africa. Want to know what an African American looks like today? I work with someone who was actually born in Africa. He's white. Kinda like Murdock from the new A-Team movie (I kinda wanted to reference his awesome job in District-9, but that seems too obvious)
Anyway, back to the video: While I certainly don't hold the notion that "sexual harassment doesn't exist," I will say that the possibility for a female to use that term without just cause does exist. For you to lump every one together as polarized extremes only shows how flawed your argument is. You seriously came out and said: "it's either me, or Ogre... there can be no middle ground." Seriously
How about man. MAN. Mailman. Anchorman. Or I've got one for you: HUMAN. Or should that be hupersons? hupeople? No matter what you've heard or who will tell you otherwise, man is short for human. A mailman is a human who does maily things. If you really think it's offensive, get over it. Mailperson, postal delivery person, etc are just awkward and unwieldy to say, plus they make red-wavy lines in MS Word, so that means they're wrong

That doesn't mean I have an issue with a woman in that role. "My mailman is a woman," seems like a perfectly valid statement. Or you can just drop the "man" if it offends you so. "The Anchor on the evening news." (mail being a homonym of male does confuse the issue somewhat) Other less formal roles like busboy or bat-boy could be suited to their female counterparts as well, but losing the alliteration would just break my heart.
Last thing, as for PotUS. If I have an issue with my Commander in Chief I will have plenty of sane, logical reasons behind it, and won't rely on his taste for fried food. (side note: I could totally go for some fried chicken right now myself... damn midnight ranting) That goes for the current President, past Presidents and future ones as well. To be honest, I do disagree with a lot of what Obama has been doing in office, but that's another story for another rant. Suffice to say, I don't bust out fried chicken and watermelon references to further my point, and neither should you, Bob.
Bottom line is this: Racist bigoted jerks are just that, whether they use "PC shields" or not. And pompous "my way or the highway" windbags are also just that. Both sets need to be called on their shenanigans.
So Bob, this is me, calling you out, on the silly overarching broad-brush shenanigans.