I'm sciencier.SomeBoredGuy said:"No! The satellite was supposed to burn their skin right off! I used all the right SCIENCE(!) and it still didn't work!"."
From what I gather, even flashing someone in the eye with this thing for less than a second could ruin them for life. Even the diffuse light from it is powerful enough to cause serious eye damage.Direct or indirect skin exposure to blue laser light is also harmful. The MPE (Maximum Permissible Exposure) for skin for a 3mm beam of this wavelength is approximately 200mW/CM^2. This is laser can easily generate a power density (irradiance) of about 15 Watts/CM^2. Therefore, this laser's beam exceeds the skin exposure MPE by ( 15 / 0.2 ) = 75 times. At this level of irradiance, skin exposure to the intense blue laser light can possibly cause cancer. Do not allow bare skin to be exposed, including your face when wearing safety goggles, to light diffusely reflected from any surface closer than several inches. This laser is a thousand times stronger than sunlight on skin and any type of exposure should be avoided whether it be from the collimated beam or close exposure to its bright diffused reflections.
Blue light hazard-- can cause BLINDNESS and not just color perception issues. The power of this laser is no joke, at 1W the Spyder III Pro Arctic is a Class 4 Laser. Do not allow unprotected eye exposure to diffusely scattered light from the beam terminating on a wall, the floor or other flat surface from this laser closer than 3 feet. Accidental eye exposure will definitely result in instant retina tissue damage even within just milliseconds of exposure. Direct eye contact with the beam or reflected will cause instant permanent damage and blindness. Sometimes blindness may take a day or longer for the onset. Unlike instant injury from a bright flash of a red or green laser, this effect is cumulative over 24 hours. It is also possible that such an exposure could cause retinal degeneration and even loss of vision later in life.
This is a very serious issue and would like to reiterate that extreme care, proper safety gear and the necessary safety precautions be followed when using the Spyder III Pro Arctic, it is not a toy, it is a high power Class 4 1W laser. In addition, this laser must NEVER be used to play with your pets. At close range, this Class 4 beam will cause immediate and irreversable retinal damage. Close proximity to the beam's diffused reflection off floors and walls could potentially cause injury and blindness. In general, DO NOT aim this laser on yourself, on your skin, on animals, on others or target moving vehicles and airplanes.
The Spyder III Pro Arctic blue laser should only be handheld by individuals who have appropriate laser safety training and product familiarity in using Class 4 lasers. For more information and guidance please refer to ANSI Standard Z136.1 from the American National Standards Institute on the safe use of lasers.
Lazarus Long said:All I want to know is - Can I light a cigarette with it? That, for me, would come close to justifying the cost. Around tax return time.
They will listen, we HAVE the power.Slycne said:It's not so much that, but that people simply need to understand that forum readership is a subsection of our traffic. The percent of people that post on the forums and read the news is pretty high as they are actively participating in the site, but a lot of people come her for any number of reasons and don't post in the forums. They will however read our news.Marik2 said:This is a reminder to all the people who are gonna say the forums ninja'd this.
THE MODS DONT GIVE A FUCK
That is all.
The stupidity is strong with this one.. very strong indeed.RadiusXd said:I don't care if i die in a horrible plane crash from one of these things.
Not when it represents the freedoms my #$%*ing nanny country government doesn't think we are mature enough to handle.
If the president of the US can launch nukes at the drop of a hat, i at least want my FU%^ING laser before I am inevitably enveoped in a mushroom cloud.
Besides death is a price I for one am well willing to pay for pure awsomness!
I mean REALLY! have lasers ever actually caused a commercial plane to crash in documented history? tell me where to find these mystical records!!
If hurt is your intent, then yes, a kitchen knife would be better suited for your murder attempt, however, if you are larking around with your little brother shining the light on him, and three weeks later he gets cancer...Slycne said:While that's true, but my point is simply that if we are discussing keeping dangerous items out of willing hands. There are far cheaper, easier and if pressed less legal ways of acquiring far more deadly instruments than this laser. It would be far easier to hurt someone with your average household kitchen knife than this.
Take heart, friend. Not everyone here is willing to die for "pure awsomness!"digotw said:RadiusXd said:I don't care if i die in a horrible plane crash from one of these things.
Not when it represents the freedoms my #$%*ing nanny country government doesn't think we are mature enough to handle.
If the president of the US can launch nukes at the drop of a hat, i at least want my FU%^ING laser before I am inevitably enveoped in a mushroom cloud.
Besides death is a price I for one am well willing to pay for pure awsomness!
I mean REALLY! have lasers ever actually caused a commercial plane to crash in documented history? tell me where to find these mystical records!!
The stupidity is strong with this one.. very strong indeed.
I have become very turned off this website by reading posts such as this.
True, I'm pretty sure a one shot only survival rifle is like 30 bucks at a camping store.Slycne said:$270 is enough to buy several guns if you are not concerned about quality.CloggedDonkey said:Gonna quote myself when I say:
CloggedDonkey said:This totally won't go wrong, nope, not at all.
OT: Wow, that really needs to be band, and the businesses shut down. I know the government going around shutting things down is very bad for PR, but you have a company selling a weapon touting as being the most deadly of it's kind ever, without any restrictions, to anyone, anywhere (in the U.K.), for a rather small price. I'm pretty sure you can't even buy a gun for two hundred seventy dollars (rough estimate), which at least then it's registered and each gun can be traced, at least in one way or another.
What this guy said.ark123 said:It's not more dangerous than a tazer.