I find it weird how england are not seen as underdogs because of this. Scotland are always seen as underdogs yet scotland and england are the same country with the same monarch and the same economyJohnny Novgorod said:Nobody in the whole of South America would consider the monarchical, aggressively pro-colonialist, pound-rich first world super powerful England an "underdog" by any definition of the word. Besides what kind of "teabagging" did you see from Uruguay towards England, or from Costar Rica towards Italy for that matter?Frankster said:People usually stop liking the underdog when they turn around and teabag their opponent who hadn't acted jerkish to them in any way xDJohnny Novgorod said:For a lot of those 2nd/3rd world countries the World Cup is their only chance to shine and earn global acclaim. Everybody likes an underdog.Frankster said:Though I'm a bit :/ at some of Suarez petty comments, I swear every time England loses to a 2nd/3rd world country in world cup they treat it as some kinda great wrong that's finally been righted.
Can't peeps just have a good game and not be bitches about it afterwards?
Besides I think by this point England can be considered an underdog in anyone but the most fervent England fan's mind.
I love being both scottish and british. We have all the benefits of being british but england just gets associated with all the bad shit. Sometimes I think that some people forget we exist or think we are a fantasy land like brig-a-doon and we only appear every 100 years (which coincidentially is about how often we appear in the world cup)