Spear. In the right hands, its a fast and agile weapon with long reach and very strong killing power, and I've had training with similar weapons. I'd also want a sword for backup (Katana, just because it's the only sword I've had training with).
This is, of course, assuming I couldn't use any weapons not on the list. My true weapon of choice would be a hired assassin. What? I don't want any chance of actually losing if I can avoid it.
Dr_Pie said:
I'd like to see most of these fights. Half of you are probably going to do more harm to yourself than your opponent if you take dual swords or something like that =P
I, likewise, would love to see that. Dual-wielding is a pain in the ass; I've only ever tried three dual-wielding styles; dual short-swords, dual clubs (no formal training in either), and katana-wakisashi (Niten style; I've had very brief formal training). I'm not good at it. I'd much rather use a single weapon than two.
Dual wielding heavy weapons (axes, broadswords, katanas, maces) is VERY difficult, and a very slow fighting style if you aren't incredibly strong (which I'm gonna guess most of us here are not). Dual wielding chain weapons (flails, or the infamous spiked chain) is even worse; you now have a heavy and slow weapon that you can barely control. The three most common weapon styles used in military combat throughout history is Spear (all variants), sword-and-board (also: hatchet, light spear, etc. +shield), and single two-handed axe (horse-killer, heavy spiked club, flail, etc.). Dual wielding is extremely rare in western military history; the only example I know of is rapier and dagger, which is used for duals, not on the field. Japanese culture saw use of Niten style to some extent, and it actually became rather famous and effective. Yet, the vast majority of samurai stuck with the trusty single weapon style.