The increasing hostility to games as art, games journalism, the industry, and Mass Effect 3.

Recommended Videos

BreakfastMan

Scandinavian Jawbreaker
Jul 22, 2010
4,367
0
0
him over there said:
BreakfastMan said:
him over there said:
Mostly it was the realization that the idolized "Games are art and wonderful" thing came crashing down and they saw that developers were using it to tell everyone "If we acknowledge our game is dumb and stupid it's okay for it to be dumb and stupid because it's on purpose."
Dandark said:
Now I tend to look on it negativily because of all the people whining and bitching endlessly about the ME3 ending being changed and constantly moaning about people being "entitled" and all that crap. I just got sick of that and the whole argument for games needing to be confirmed as art by the public.
Why? Why does stupid devs using stupid excuses change this? Do they stop games from being art forever? Or being considered art? I do not get this. :/
It doesn't disqualify games as art. People who play games howeverare discouraged from supporting devs who say theywant games to be art because they feel it is an insincere sentiment to dodge all criticisms.
But why? Why does one dev making stupid excuses automatically reflect badly on all others? Does it not reflect badly on that one dev, and no one else (unless they too use that excuse)?
 

Risingblade

New member
Mar 15, 2010
2,893
0
0
I feel that you are part of the problem. You can't fight hostility with more hostility and expect everything to be all fine and dandy. So please stop makes threads about being angry at people who are angry. Let's all just get along~
 

Erana

New member
Feb 28, 2008
8,010
0
0
I'm also tired with all the recent anger, but I don't like abusive publishers, and the "games as art" thing...
URGH.

You know who gets to write the canon for what art is in society? The art world. Those guys with the museums and galleries and art schools and the likes. Whether you like it or not, if they call it art, the general assumption is that it is considered art by society, even if you're the first to jump up and decry it as bullshit.

But of course, if I dare mention that, I'm suddenly being an elitist ***** and "art is a subjective, personal thing" and all the several thousand hours of my life dedicated to the practice, study of and discussion about art is completely invalid in making such an appraisal of video games as art in society.
I'm not telling you how you what to think about art, I'm trying to tell you why things aren't progressing better in society's perception of video games and what could be done to fix it.

But just fuck this, I'm tired of it.
Bring up "games as art", and people are throwing around whatever they want that's tangentally related to art an video games without having any sort of agenda or attempt to change anything. It seems about as productive as the threads decrying the issues of Halo 3.
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,093
0
0
BreakfastMan said:
Those who label "games as art" have suffered a similar fate. They are called "pretentious snobs", "anti-consumer", "stupid", and less nice names.
That's because back when the games as art thing was popular, they had a habit of saying games that didn't move the medium forward shouldn't exist as it was dragging it down. They sort of asked for it.
 

tobi the good boy

New member
Dec 16, 2007
1,229
0
0
Games are art, art can be shit and contrary to popular belief; art can be changed.

Movies are a 'confirmed' artform and they constantly undergo screenings that can lead to huge development changes over how it was received. I don't really understand how holding something up as art is a get out of jail free card
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
BreakfastMan said:
Hal10k said:
It's the internet. We have the collective attention span of a cocker spaniel on meth. Trends like these last two months, tops. By then we'll have moved on to the next big crisis and the general attitude will have dissipated.
I don't know. It is coming up on 2 months already, and these trends show no signs of disappearing. Hell, the ME3 things has died down, but these remain still very prevalent. I would not have made a thread about it otherwise. :/
and not to mention what will happen when the new "fix" is release

it'll be quite a show folks!
 

Phlakes

Elite Member
Mar 25, 2010
4,282
0
41
That's how people work. Here's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_psychology] the Wikipedia page on social psychology, you'll recognize a damn lot of things.

Or to put it simply- in a group, people's opinions get amplified together into a jumbled mess of bias and paranoia that become actual beliefs. And what's the single largest group of people in the world, that also happens to lack the usual social barriers that keep people in line?

Yep.

Just take a look at the Bioware forums, people seriously believe that some/most reviewers get paid off and publishers plant moles all over the internet years in advance to clean up PR messes. Alone, they wouldn't believe this for a second, but the internet is an echo chamber, and when it keeps coming around and building up that bias, things like the Bioware forums can happen.
 

Bara_no_Hime

New member
Sep 15, 2010
3,646
0
0
BreakfastMan said:
For discussion's sake: Do you feel the same as me? If so, when do you think the hostility of the gaming community reached boiling point?
Yes. I feel the same. I've been watching people go at one another's throats about very stupid things, and it just makes me shake my head in disgust.

I don't know why. Growing pains, maybe? Someone (EC? Jim Sterling?) called this era the "Adolescence of Gaming" and I will say, it certainly feels like it.

I certainly hope it doesn't take gaming another 10 years to grow out of it. Ugh.
 

Meatspinner

New member
Feb 4, 2011
435
0
0
Better that people share their opinions about a given subject then having a stagnant wank fest where it eventually turns into a moldy turd.

And I hope they get to keep their opinions and not be silenced by those of thin skins and lack of tolerance.
 

Thoric485

New member
Aug 17, 2008
632
0
0
I like to think of games as art, but I can't think of anything that comes out of EA as art.

They cut out chunks from games to monetize separately, often damaging the core experience, they choke studios with ever-shortening development cycles, not allowing them to further their craft, and they hoard licenses they have no use for, keeping them from people that can do something good with them.

Look at the support CD Projekt provide for their games, not for the sake of avoiding outrage or eeking out money, but because they want to get their product in the best shape possible. Look at the way Valve grows and evolves from within, instead of absorbing other successful enterprises, and the way they and Bethesda support the PC modding community. Look at all the indie projects Paradox give way to.

Those are companies that support video games as art. EA are anti-art. They buried Bullfrog, Origin, Westwood, Mythic, Pandemic and soon BioWare. They bastardized their franchises, while producing nothing themselves but sports shovelware, successful due to their monopoly on professional team licenses.

They deserve nothing but scrutiny and bile.
 

BreakfastMan

Scandinavian Jawbreaker
Jul 22, 2010
4,367
0
0
Risingblade said:
I feel that you are part of the problem. You can't fight hostility with more hostility and expect everything to be all fine and dandy. So please stop makes threads about being angry at people who are angry. Let's all just get along~
I am trying to change stuff. You can't always change stuff with flowers and roses. :/

Chertan said:
Better that people share their opinions about a given subject then having a stagnant wank fest where it eventually turns into a moldy turd.

And I hope they get to keep their opinions and not be silenced by those of thin skins and lack of tolerance.
There is a difference between offering criticism and insulting someone. You can disagree with Hepler's ideas, for instance, but not call her a "fat cow". Honestly, I want more the the former, much less of the latter, which I do not see.
 

Risingblade

New member
Mar 15, 2010
2,893
0
0
BreakfastMan said:
Risingblade said:
I feel that you are part of the problem. You can't fight hostility with more hostility and expect everything to be all fine and dandy. So please stop makes threads about being angry at people who are angry. Let's all just get along~
I am trying to change stuff. You can't always change stuff with flowers and roses. :/


Roses are flowers, try candy that might work.
 

dragonswarrior

Also a Social Justice Warrior
Feb 13, 2012
434
0
0
See... This hasn't really changed my views on games as art at all, since I consider most peoples views on art to be ridiculous to begin with. The ME3 ending debacle has only confirmed and reinforced my views.

Yes, I see games as art, even after all the crying about dev's artistic integrity. Because I have always considered "artistic integrity" to be objecitivist bullshit. Quality is quality regardless of the source.

Through this whole thing I try to judge each individuals arguments on an individual basis (something very hard to do that I frequently fail at but I try.) Sooo... If someone is talking about "entitlement" or whatever, I ignore them if they are being stupid, and pay attention if they are being smart. This allows me to not get upset at the things you are getting upset at.

Which may or may not be a good thing. Passion is what frequently stirs change, and clearly your passionate about trying to stop stupid people from being stupid. WHICH IS AWESOME!!! Its just... Not something I can give my energy to. So I ignore the stupid people.
 

War Penguin

Serious Whimsy
Jun 13, 2009
5,717
0
0
I think what caused the uproar was that no one was really representing the fans/consumers. Not Bioware, definitely not EA, but most shockingly, not the journalists. The journalists usually are the people siding with the fanbase and consumers, but now they were all fighting against them. The big ones, at least. The smaller ones tried to fight for the fanbase and consumers, or tried to stay neutral in the whole issue [small](and could you blame them?)[/small].

I think this led the fans do one thing: defend themselves. If the journalists couldn't defend them, they could... sorta. The problem was that the only way they knew how to defend themselves wasn't the way that they would be taken seriously by the rest of the public. Not to mention the improbability that they'd get noticed, anyway. They'd need to say some crazy stuff for people to get their attention. Hell, since it would also require every other fan to work together. However, not all of them would agree with smaller issues, which would lead to infighting. In short: RAAAGE!!!

As for the art thing... I dunno, really. Yeah, this came out'a left field for me. Considering how lots of people were trying to convince every other non gamer that gaming is an art form, it was surprising that they decided that games are products and not art. I guess that whole "setting gaming as an art form back ten years" thing made them realize that the whole "games as art" argument could be used against them.

I predicted this would happen: Neither the fans, the journalists, or Bioware/EA came out/are coming out good in all of this. Fans can't keep a level head, journalists didn't side with fans, considering how that's usually how it's supposed to happen, and do I need to explain Bioware/EA?

Yeah, I wish this rage would stop, too. However, considering what has happened, it's hard not to get pissed off along side them, either. I just wish that everyone would have kept a reasonable and level head about this. Like this guy:


... I... I love you.

So yeah, in short, I think there's legitimacy to the rage, considering how there's no one representing the masses, but the way it's being handled throws all credibility out the window. So yes. I'm tired of the rage and needless hate, now. There's no way to be justified anymore. Let's please stop.
 

Iszfury

New member
Oct 25, 2011
90
0
0
The idea that "Games are Art" only became unpopular after it turned out to be an inconvenient one; the masses shed that contention once they realized it would backfire if ever addressed.
I enjoyed ME3 - however, disliked the ending, and was initially warmed up slightly to the Retake movement, but after seeing how they conducted their image and their behaviors towards the developers and journalists, I began to diverge a bit. In my opinion, the position that consumer sovereignty should dictate artistic direction is just as silly as "authorial divinity." Kudos to the people that desperately wanted to work with Bioware, not against them. It was a terrible misunderstanding aggravated by sensationalism and hysteria on both sides. I'm looking forward to the Extended Cut, and hope it improves the narrative as much as promised.

Thanks for the post, OP. People need to stop flaring into a maddened blood rage upon learning that contradictory opinions even exist.
 

NinjaDeathSlap

Leaf on the wind
Feb 20, 2011
4,474
0
0
BreakfastMan said:
So, ever since the ME3 ending thing, I have noticed something.... Different about the gaming community. Mostly that there is a huge increase in hostility to nearly every damn source. Their was already some hostility to game journalists before, but it was only increased to an insane degree with the ME3 ending. Same with devs. I can't walk two feet without someone hating pubs or Bioware. Those who label "games as art" have suffered a similar fate. They are called "pretentious snobs", "anti-consumer", "stupid", and less nice names.

And you know what? AM I SICK OF IT. ALL OF THIS DAMN HOSTILITY. I BLOODY HATE IT WITH A FIERY PASSION. People cannot bloody take opposing views to them anymore. Even people who are considered "big names" in this community are acting more snobbish, elitist, and hateful than the people they love to decry. Why can't we clean up our act? When did we become a community filled with hateful, cynical trolls? I love games. I really do. And I want to share that love with people who have similar passions and feelings to me. But so many are making it so damn hard to want to be part of the fecking community.

Let get it out of the way: I think games are art. I think it would be nice for the culture at large to consider them that, but I don't care all that much. I do not think pubs are evil. I do not think that games journalism is evil and inherently corrupt. Nor do I hate those who have different opinions to mine. Troll me and flame me all you want. I don't give a crap. Because I find it hard to care about what the gaming community thinks any more.

/rant

For discussion's sake: Do you feel the same as me? If so, when do you think the hostility of the gaming community reached boiling point? If you do not feel the same as me, why? Do you see something that I might be missing, that redeems the community?
While I don't really care if games are considered 'art' by the wider population, I can see where the hostility is coming from. What I know I don't want to see is an industry where any hack can hide behind the word 'art' like it's some kind of criticism-deflecting force field, and then to have everyone who's anyone in the industry rush to their defense and be unnecessarily disparaging about any fan who dares to suggest that improvements could be made to such a sacred piece of 'art'. This is pretty much what we saw with the ME3 ending.

You see, I don't think it matters whether or not games are art because I don't think it matters if anything is art or not anymore. It's become such an arbitrary term. For example; people kept using the analogy 'You wouldn't ask a painter to change his painting after it's been hung up, so to ask Bioware to change the ending would be to invalidate their art.'

To this, I ask a simple question... Why is the painting 'art' either? I'm serious. What makes a painting, any painting, 'art' by default? Says who?

All that painting is, literally all that it is, is a piece of canvas with some brush strokes on it, encased in a frame and hung on a wall. That's it. That is the sum of its parts. Whether or not this is 'art' depends entirely on who's looking at it, and to call something 'art' is not to attach some new set of rules to it and to how it can be treated. It changes nothing, it means nothing.

Personally, so long as I am entertained, engaged, and emotionally invested in what I am playing, then that's enough for me, because these are real emotions and responses that I can trust in myself. Beyond that I don't give the slightest shit who wants to call what 'art'. But here's the thing, if I criticise a game in the presence of someone who enjoyed it, and they turned on me and said "Well what do you know? You're not an artist. You just don't get it and therefore you have no right to question the 'art', you dirty little pleb!" then that person is a pretentious tool, pure and simple.

This is the response we got from Bioware and the industry at large the moment we even started talking about a new ending. No negotiation, no consideration, no respect. They used 'games are art' as an excuse to exclude us completely from the discussion. Damn right we were gonna flip our shit about that, as well as get pretty disillusioned about the 'games are art' discussion in general. If we had known that calling something you love 'art' actually lowers your status as a fan of it rather than elevates it, we never would have asked for it in the first place.
 

Iszfury

New member
Oct 25, 2011
90
0
0
War Penguin said:
THAT video approached the issue perfectly. THAT is rational, objective, thoughtful input, not the drivel a vocal minority has been force feeding us all this time. He deserves a medal. Damn.