The most pathetic weapon in gaming history

Recommended Videos

outbreak21093

New member
May 2, 2008
7
0
0
The Iron Ninja said:
The Frying pan in the original Fable you got as a "reward" for completing the treasure hunt quest.
For those who haven't played said game: It didn't do any damage, at all.
its only weak if you didnt get all the treasure clues ;) its actualy i belive the 2nd strongest weapon for melee in the game from what i remember... and you can put more than the useual amount of augments in it... also... i think the weakest weapon ever is the stick from fable... try killing anything bigger than a bug with that! >_>;;
 

Redingold

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Mar 28, 2009
1,641
0
0
nickkos said:
hmmm how about...

Sir Daniel Fortesque's Arm

KUDOS and Puppies to anyone who gets that reference and which game
MediEvil. It's the starting weapon.
 

Aura Guardian

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,114
0
0
scotth266 said:
The FLUDD from Super Smash Bros. Brawl.

All you can do is MAYBE get a lucky kill by pushing the person away from the ledge. MAYBE. If they aren't paying attention.
Watch the third match.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akBHZ2R9udU
 

Halceon

New member
Jan 31, 2009
820
0
0
quack35 said:
Kukul said:
I know it's pretty obscure, but anyone tried to use a bow in Mount&Blade? I'm pretty good at shooting things in games, but I couldn't even hit a horse with that shit.
Ugh, crossbow is even worse.
Just shows your skills. For once there's a medieval weapon in a game that suffers from every single bloody possible detrimental factor you'll face in the field, especially not really seeing where your shot lands. And, yes, i have survived tournaments where half of the matches i was an archer with or without horse. There's almost no better companion to sieges than a crossbow. And nothing, absolutely nothing beats the beauty of a throwing spear while fighting khergits on an open field.
 

arc101

New member
May 24, 2009
1,173
0
0
I once was forced to use only the pistol in Return to castle wolfenstein, because of a glitch and it was weak!
 

Fallingwater

New member
Mar 20, 2009
177
0
0
quiet_samurai said:
Just the generic starting pistol you recieve on the first level of everygame that involves shooting others.
Eh, not really. Some games keep the little peashooter useful. In Half Life, for example, it's useful to kill headcrabs, and if you can spare the time it's better to use that than the submachinegun, because they use the same ammo but the gun damages 8 per shot, while the mp5 damages 5.
Doom 3's gun is also good for killing spiders.
And Unreal's dispersion pistol becomes the most powerful weapon in the game once it's upgraded (too bad they removed the one-amplified-shot-kills-everything feature in the patches).

"You must destroy this radar installation single handedly, you are outnumbered, and at some point every enemy in the complex will know you are there...... take this pistol and one spare clip.
This is not entirely a silly premise; in WW2, the US manufactured very cheap, single-shot handguns that were meant to be dropped behind enemy lines to be used by resistance forces. You were supposed to kill an enemy soldier with the tiny gun and get his weapon.
Of course, such a premise in a videogame makes sense only if the organization sending you to shoot up the enemy force is a penniless band of rebels, or something. If it's a big MegaCorp you'd think it wouldn't kill them to give you a damn assault rifle at the very least.

As for actual examples, I think Fallout 3's silly .32 revolver definitely counts. However, in the end I had huge amounts of 10mm ammo that I never used (I liked the Zhuanwhatever assault rifle a lot more than Sidney's SMG), so I modded the revolver to use 10mm, upped its damage a bit, and used it during easy random encounters. It made me feel all western-y to shoot five shots, reload, and shoot a few more all in a single VATS turn. :p all it lacked was Rushuna Tendo's cleavage reload capability...
The chinese pistol sucked too, but the unique version set people on fire, which can be considered as a significant plus.

Morrowind's various tiny daggers and small swords. After the first five minutes of gaming you're already trying to get the biggest sword you can get your hands on, and everything smaller is basically only useful as loot.

Shadow Warrior's Shurikens. Seriously, did anyone EVER use them? You threw three in a wide pattern, only the one going straight forward ever hit anything, and did less damage than a uzi shot.

I've come across many more sucky weapons, but I can't remember them right now.

Edit: whoa, long post. I really do have too much free time.
 

AvsJoe

Elite Member
May 28, 2009
9,055
0
41
Prod! Worms series.

1 damage and barely moves enemy. Great for rubbing victory in opponent's face when you prod for the victory, though.
 

Sebenko

New member
Dec 23, 2008
2,531
0
0
Kukul said:
I know it's pretty obscure, but anyone tried to use a bow in Mount&Blade? I'm pretty good at shooting things in games, but I couldn't even hit a horse with that shit.
yep. Dear god that was useless. I'll stick to the rusty sword over just about any bow in the game.
 

Triple G

New member
Sep 12, 2008
484
0
0
The first pistol you get in S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Shadow of Chernobyl. If you want to kill a mutant boar with this thing you better pack a few tonns of bullets.

EDIT: Wait, I got a better one. If you play double Dragon III on the NES and kill the ninja boss you can take over his body and be him, he got some shurikens and they're so sucky that everyone(even minions I think) could evade them.
 

darnel64

New member
Feb 9, 2009
23
0
0
Self-defence pistol Resident evil GC one .22 calibur bullet, one! I picked it up once and it screwed me over for inventory space. I hate that gun...
 

BolognaBaloney

New member
Mar 17, 2009
2,672
0
0
ZZoMBiE13 said:
I'll throw my vote in for the "gems" in Dead Rising. Or any of a number of useless items that can be weaponized, even though they never ever should be.
Or the cd's...