The New Tea Party

Recommended Videos

Jeronus

New member
Nov 14, 2008
1,305
0
0
Eclectic Dreck said:
Had there been a Tea Party closer to my home, I would likely have attended. Not because I particularly care about the cause, I just enjoy the spectacle of silly people being silly.
I wish I could have been there to see big boobed Obama in underwear holding a mutilated Elmo. That would have made my year.
 

Barry93

New member
Mar 5, 2009
528
0
0
The ignorance in this thread is unreal. Fox is covering the tea parties because people are tired of the govt. spending trillions during a recession and making BS taxes. They're covering it extensively because no other network wants to cover it. besides, as you liberals would say, "were just expressing our right to a free speech." So much for the "free minded" liberal; in reality most of them cannot sit down and listen to others people's opinions without interupting them in the first 5 seconds. The left protested everyday during the bush years and it was fine, but the moment the right organizes one, were all of a sudden nazis and racists.
 

Muphin_Mann

New member
Oct 4, 2007
285
0
0
Barry93 said:
The ignorance in this thread is unreal. Fox is covering the tea parties because people are tired of the govt. spending trillions during a recession and making BS taxes. They're covering it extensively because no other network wants to cover it. besides, as you liberals would say, "were just expressing our right to a free speech." So much for the "free minded" liberal; in reality most of them cannot sit down and listen to others people's opinions without interupting them in the first 5 seconds. The left protested everyday during the bush years and it was fine, but the moment the right organizes one, were all of a sudden nazis and racists.
TO be fair, everyone on the right complained about the left being a buncha hippies and communists whenever they protested Bush. So really, its just the sides being reversed.
 

Jeronus

New member
Nov 14, 2008
1,305
0
0
Cheeze_Pavilion said:
Jeronus said:
chronobreak said:
Conservatives don't support protesters, liberals are upset. They start supporting dissent, liberals are still upset. Somebody sounds whiny, and it's not the conservatives.
The liberals aren't upset because they are in charge and the conservatives who previously had it their way are now out of power so what do they want to do? They want to throw the current party out of power. Both sides do this little dance every time the other one comes to power. This time it is the Conservatives who whine while the liberals have all the power.
The difference being that in general, liberals *still* protest even when other liberals are in power if they disagree with them, while conservatives don't protest when other conservatives are in power no matter how 'unconservative' they may be.
I beg to differ.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet_Miers_Supreme_Court_nomination
 

Barry93

New member
Mar 5, 2009
528
0
0
Muphin_Mann said:
Barry93 said:
The ignorance in this thread is unreal. Fox is covering the tea parties because people are tired of the govt. spending trillions during a recession and making BS taxes. They're covering it extensively because no other network wants to cover it. besides, as you liberals would say, "were just expressing our right to a free speech." So much for the "free minded" liberal; in reality most of them cannot sit down and listen to others people's opinions without interupting them in the first 5 seconds. The left protested everyday during the bush years and it was fine, but the moment the right organizes one, were all of a sudden nazis and racists.
TO be fair, everyone on the right complained about the left being a buncha hippies and communists whenever they protested Bush. So really, its just the sides being reversed.
yes hippies and communists, the tea party protesters are just regular americans, well execpt maybe for the ones at the Alamo but you get the point
 

Alex_P

All I really do is threadcrap
Mar 27, 2008
2,712
0
0
sorrlymesentoe said:
So, they are protesting wasteful spending by buying truckloads of teabags then just dumping them in any body of water....right, thats not wasteful at all.
Maybe next month they can start a giant man-train to protest gay marriage.

-- Alex
 

Jeronus

New member
Nov 14, 2008
1,305
0
0
Alex_P said:
sorrlymesentoe said:
So, they are protesting wasteful spending by buying truckloads of teabags then just dumping them in any body of water....right, thats not wasteful at all.
Maybe next month they can start a giant man-train to protest gay marriage.

-- Alex
Knowing Conservatives, they just might do but not in public.
 

Pseudonym2

New member
Mar 31, 2008
1,086
0
0
Lyiat said:
Urgh... This ignorence again?

I don't know what you guys are thinking, but the Tea Parties are in place to prevent more taxes from being put into place. They arn't speaking out against the ones already in place, they are just working tword stopping a new wave of BS taxes. For instance, New Hampshire is planning on instituting its first Death Tax. We don't want that, so there was a protest held against it. What is so wrong with that?


The "Death Tax" only kicks at taxing the inheritance of extremely rich people. No one is going to benefit removing the Estate Tax other than lazy rich people. Do you really want to start a protest in order to create a class of Paris Hiltons? Besides, according to Paul Krugman even with the estate tax you still get taxed more if earn a million dollars than if you inherent a million dollars.

Sorry but the whole thing reeks of astoturf.
 

Barry93

New member
Mar 5, 2009
528
0
0
Cheeze_Pavilion said:
Barry93 said:
The ignorance in this thread is unreal. Fox is covering the tea parties because people are tired of the govt. spending trillions during a recession and making BS taxes. They're covering it extensively because no other network wants to cover it.
Because it's a non-story. How many liberal protests did those networks cover which are of the same size as these tea parties?



besides, as you liberals would say, "were just expressing our right to a free speech." So much for the "free minded" liberal; in reality most of them cannot sit down and listen to others people's opinions without interupting them in the first 5 seconds. The left protested everyday during the bush years and it was fine, but the moment the right organizes one, were all of a sudden nazis and racists.
The left also protested everyday during the clinton years, and are already protesting the obama years over the torture memos among other things.

On the other hand, while bush was acting like a tax and spend liberal, conservatives weren't protesting nearly to the degree liberals protested clinton.

It's not that conservatives are "all of a sudden nazis and racists" because they are protesting: it's that they are hypocrites for only protesting against liberals who they disagree with and not against conservatives that take their movement and run it into the ground.

No one wants to listen to a hypocrite for more than 5 seconds.

Liberals are never happy with who they elect, they buy the candadites empty promises and then take to the streets when they get elected. The right has O'Reilly to bash bad poloticians. The tea parties aren't about right vs. left. While the majority were conservative at the tea parties the overall purpose was against a govt. that is out of control. BOTH conservative and liberal senators are spending way too much on useless programs and that's why there were protests. this got so much coverage from fox because they seemed to be the only network that realized this. MSNBC and CNN looked at it and thought "they're criticizing dear leader Obama who can do no wrong! it must be purely right wing directed only against liberals." or perhaps they do realize this and decided to spew propanda to their ignorant and loyal viewers to save their ratings (which are in the toilet by the way)
 

asinann

New member
Apr 28, 2008
1,602
0
0
Barry93 said:
The ignorance in this thread is unreal. Fox is covering the tea parties because people are tired of the govt. spending trillions during a recession and making BS taxes. They're covering it extensively because no other network wants to cover it. besides, as you liberals would say, "were just expressing our right to a free speech." So much for the "free minded" liberal; in reality most of them cannot sit down and listen to others people's opinions without interupting them in the first 5 seconds. The left protested everyday during the bush years and it was fine, but the moment the right organizes one, were all of a sudden nazis and racists.
Last I checked, it was the conservatives calling the liberals Nazis, and many of the most conservative areas of the country are bastions of racism.

When it was liberals protesting they were being "unamerican" and getting investigated with illegal wire taps. Most of these "new taxes" being instituted are just taxes being reinstated that the Bush administration either left as a time bomb waiting to blow up (make the estate tax go away) or just removed entirely (and all of those taxes only affected the rich.)
 

Spyre2000

New member
Apr 18, 2009
45
0
0
Let me just start out by stating this fun fact. For the price of the recent bail out we could of instead told every citizen that they didn't need to pay their taxes this year. That's right the amount spent is equal to the total income taxes collected in a year. I think giving everyone refund checks worth everything they had paid away would of helped the economy a lot more. After all they take about 1/3 of your income in taxes so getting it back would of been like a 50% raise since you only kept 2/3 before.

Now think about it this way. Someone steals your identity and goes out and buys a years worth of your income on stuff and then you are told you have to pay the bill! The government isn't paying for these bailouts with money it has. It is going out and getting LOANS to pay for this which also have INTEREST attached to it.

Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it. You know the great depression? Well most people think that is was FDR's New Deal and all the government regulations that helped get us out of it. Turns out now many economist believe that in fact it prolonged it for several YEARS! And that's what we are all in for now. The link below is to an old article but it explains the basic premise.
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409.aspx?RelNum=5409

The economy is actually very good at self correcting. The problem comes when people start messing with it via regulations and other prohibitive activities.


EDIT: Here is a nice quote from the end of the article which I think fits quiet nicely given the events in the world today.
"The fact that the Depression dragged on for years convinced generations of economists and policy-makers that capitalism could not be trusted to recover from depressions and that significant government intervention was required to achieve good outcomes," Cole said. "Ironically, our work shows that the recovery would have been very rapid had the government not intervened."
 

Barry93

New member
Mar 5, 2009
528
0
0
asinann said:
Barry93 said:
The ignorance in this thread is unreal. Fox is covering the tea parties because people are tired of the govt. spending trillions during a recession and making BS taxes. They're covering it extensively because no other network wants to cover it. besides, as you liberals would say, "were just expressing our right to a free speech." So much for the "free minded" liberal; in reality most of them cannot sit down and listen to others people's opinions without interupting them in the first 5 seconds. The left protested everyday during the bush years and it was fine, but the moment the right organizes one, were all of a sudden nazis and racists.
Last I checked, it was the conservatives calling the liberals Nazis, and many of the most conservative areas of the country are bastions of racism.

When it was liberals protesting they were being "unamerican" and getting investigated with illegal wire taps. Most of these "new taxes" being instituted are just taxes being reinstated that the Bush administration either left as a time bomb waiting to blow up (make the estate tax go away) or just removed entirely (and all of those taxes only affected the rich.)
Just read my post above yours; it explains the true purpose of the protests. if they are just reinstating them, then so much for "CHANGE." Oh Christ, your one of those Anti-wire tap people. Bush really pushed the rules, but they weren't illeagal (indirectly says so in the constitution). Which is a document the liberal poloticains have put through a paper shredder in recent years. oh, people say it's invading on peoples privacy but i certainly have no problem with the govt. doing that. Rather that than another attack on the US. But a leader has a right to protect his country.

Also, some conservatives were calling some liberals communists, not nazis. i wouldn't expect you to know this, but there's a huge difference.

Your probably one of those liberals that hate everything the bush administration did but if obama does the same exact thing, than it's ok.
 

Barry93

New member
Mar 5, 2009
528
0
0
When did the tea parties start?[/quote]

recent ones: April 15th(tax day)
old ones: 1773