That's right, it is. It received a perfect score and it is a good game, which is a contradiction in of itself. Even if it is just the ending, one wrong thing already obliterates a chance at being in the highest bracket. Putting aside the game has been a bit simplified for the sake of action (whether that's a good thing or not is opinionated),but the fact that the playable roster is so much smaller is a negative to. I do believe it deserves a great review and a high number, but 10 is a bit pushing it. Of course it is kind of pointless to argue this, since 10 has become synonymous with 'it's a New high profile game' and no longer 'it's a spectacular game that defined our generation'. I also know the reason why they do this is because every other score is considered a zero by the way our rating system works now. It's fun to live by extremes, apparently.TheKasp said:It receives good scores because *shock* it is a good game.
I also don't know how GAME worked, but if they are anything like GameStop they cannibalized and destroyed all their competitors. By the way people described it, I assume GAME did something similar as it seemed to be the only contender widely available. It is very silly to say it's ok that consumers now have to turn to the internet to get something that should be widely available. It works better the deeper to get into the hard core crowd, but it gets shaky when you factor in everyone else. Whether or not the game is a Triple-A title being pushed by advertising also helps, but not every game has that luxury. Believe it or not, people still like to buy merchandise at stores. If they didn't then EVERY store would have already been put out of business by Amazon and eBay. Of course this excludes renting, but having a rental subscription and buying something is entierly different.
I could be wrong, we will see after this. Rating the success of a Triple-A game is hardly the best way to gauge it though, particularly a game that was an end to a widely known trilogy.