Aku_San said:
Although according to the report, less than less than 1% (that wasn't a typo, btw) have failed in the UK... and they are making a big damn deal about it?
1% is still 12500 disappointed consumers, and Watchdog is a consumer affairs program.
I think the issue isn't just the number of failures, but how much Sony are charging to fix the problem after 12 months.
Crunchy English said:
Seems a bit biased. Why focus on a problem that only affects a fraction of a percent of the install base? Surely it's irresponsible to compare that to a 54% fail rate over on the other side?
These guys took the lazy way out, and looked stupid because of it. When the system you're clearly accepting money from (Xbox360) has a 54% failrate, you talk about ANYTHING else, not invent a barely relevant problem in your competitiors.
You're missing the point, Watchdog isn't entering the console wars and batting for Microsoft, they're reporting in a very real issue in the UK which has affected 12500 consumers, it's not even relevant to compare it to the 360 when the story is about the PS3 and Sony's questionable business practices affecting the consumer.
Also, why would Watchdog, a British consumer affairs program, make a comparison with questionable figures derived from a shoddy poll of American readers of an American magazine?
It's not relevant, and even if somehow relevant to compare the failure rates of PS3 in the UK to the failure rates of 360's in America, that poll is of such laughable validity that it wouldn't be included.
The poll didn't ask which model of 360 had failed, it didn't even require people to have ever owned a 360 to answer in the poll, all they had to be was a subscriber to the magazine to contribute to the 54% failure rate.
I doubt the BBC are taking money from Microsoft, and 12500 failures in the UK isn't a barely relevant problem, neither is the 150 pounds repair cost (which is the real issue), for a consumer affairs program like Watchdog.