Mazty said:
TPiddy your arguments always consist of subjective nonsense - you are just another xbox fanboy who dismisses logical thought for Sony bashing. Hopefully your stay here won't be too long.
Fact is, the 360 technicians admitted it was released a year earlier than it should have been.
Fact is, the 360's failure rate is far, far higher than that of the PS3.
Fact is, if the PS3 hardware fails, BY LAW, the retailer have to replace it as long as you can show you haven't been smashing it against walls etc (This applies to the UK's Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994).
Oh and to add to s69's comments, out of the 3 360 owners I know, one has not had his break, one has had his break twice (GPU broke and RROD), and the third is on his fourth.
Out of the 6 PS3 owners I know, none have had theirs have any hardware problems.
And you think this can just be dismissed?
Naive no?
I've never once said that 360 wasn't released to early for it's own good or that RROD was not a big problem for them. I've never said that the 360's failure rate is nothing but way higher than PS3.
I have never argued AGAINST 360's hardware problems. They are well documented and thrown in my face on a regular basis.
My argument here has been twofold. The first, original argument was that Microsoft has owned up to it's problem and is now providing 3 year warranties on everything related to RROD or E74 and the new Elites have acceptable failure rates (on par with PS3), whereas the OP's article seemed to point to Sony not wanting to own up to a potential problem of it's own. Whether you feel they should or not is a matter of opinion and is really what this whole thread has been about. Not once have I ever implied that this makes the PS3's hardware anywhere near as bad as 360's.
My second argument was against all the PS3 fanboys who tout the "54%" failure rate survey as though it were a hard fact, when it is simply an opinion. How can you even quote this number when many of the people surveyed had never owned 360's to begin with?
The FACT that the 360 has hardware problems has not stopped it from being more popular than the PS3. It never stopped me from buying one and it didn't stop me from upgrading to an Elite.
And yes, whether it's you, s69-5 or any other PS3 fanboy that's out there, you can quote how many 'friends' you have with 360's that broke and 'friends' you have with PS3's that didn't break all you want. I really don't give a fuck whose system broke and whose did not, it can easily be dismissed for exactly what it is, a useless statistic that will not influence anyone's opinion on the systems in any way.
My argument has, and always will be.... "The PS3 has better hardware and more features but I don't like the games that come out on it so I bought a 360". I'm not sure why you feel the need to convince me otherwise like you're some kind of Sony religious zealot.