These are the rules that the actual pros play MW2 by

Recommended Videos

2012 Wont Happen

New member
Aug 12, 2009
4,286
0
0
These rules would make the game really boring. It wouldn't be fun in any way. Most of the reason I prefer MW2 to other FPS's is customizing kill streaks and making my class as beastly as possible.
 

Shenanigans176

New member
Dec 2, 2009
105
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
This is like only playing on Final Destination with no items on SSBB...boring and only for the tourney tards.
You sir, are my new hero.

This is exactly what it's like. I feel like if you take out the fun stuff, it's not fun (go figure, right?) and I really do play video games for the sole purpose of having fun. So no, I really would hate playing like this.
 

scorch 13

New member
Mar 24, 2009
1,017
0
0
DannyBoy451 said:
"Hey, wanna play MW2?"

"SURE: NO PERKS. NO EQUIPMENT. NO GUNS. NO KILLSTREAKS. FINAL DESTINATION"


Seriously, these people dedicate themselves to making games as unenjoyable as possible.
i agree 1000% because its true.
 

firedfns13

New member
Jun 4, 2009
1,177
0
0
I could enjoy playing games like that sometimes.
It really pisses me off that they allow you to have shotguns as secondaries, especially when snipers are camping with them. Also, MW2 online isn't as great as the first one. I mean, OMFG killstreaks! Yeah!
But think of how useless most are up until 9 and 11. And by then you've ruined the game. In Cod4, I could never hit helicopters with RPGs on account of their mystical avoidance abilities, but here... everything goes down so easily with all the rockets if you take the time to shoot them and don't get spawn raped.
 

TK421

New member
Apr 16, 2009
826
0
0
No Bling
No One Man Army

No grenade launchers
No claymores
No C4
No secondary launchers
No blast shields
No tactical insertions
No riot shields
No secondary shotguns

No killstreaks
Deathstreaks must be set to copycat in most PC leagues

No Fun

For serious, who is so deprived of a life that they would want to make all that up?
 

Tdc2182

New member
May 21, 2009
3,623
0
0
Jonny49 said:
What ever happened to playing for fun?
This. I mean seriously no bling? That isn't exactly a cheap perk. I use that one because I just like having more than one attachment. None of those are exactly cheap either. I mean seriously, Has one man army ever actually annoyed any one?

Edit: I mean seriously
 

RatRace123

Elite Member
Dec 1, 2009
6,651
0
41
NO ITEMS
FOX ONLY
FINAL DESTINATION

oh wait, which metagame are we talking about. Yeah, you know what it doesn't matter the attitude is always the same, not in it for fun, in it to win it, and to alienate everyone of a different perspective.
 

Projo

New member
Aug 3, 2009
205
0
0
The one thing worse than people that consider MW2 the greatest shooter is people that play it competitively as opposed to for fun.


Hardcore gamers are the worst kind of gamers.
 

Contextualizer

New member
Jan 8, 2010
600
0
0
Tdc2182 said:
Jonny49 said:
What ever happened to playing for fun?
This. I mean seriously no bling? That isn't exactly a cheap perk. I use that one because I just like having more than one attachment. None of those are exactly cheap either. I mean seriously, Has one man army ever actually annoyed any one?

Edit: I mean seriously
Not being cheap != being balanced.

I really feel like some of you really don't understand the idea of sports. This is no different.
 

chronobreak

New member
Sep 6, 2008
1,865
0
0
Contextualizer said:
Sigh, read the source. The league sets up the rules, just like in other sports. Not individual players.
Um... Sigh, read your quote. You place it squarely at the players. These are your exact words: "Or are the players just not "pro" enough?"

You say nothing about a league, and then quote me as if that's what you were trying to say. If so, you certainly should have said it much better, right?
 

paiged

New member
May 23, 2008
225
0
0
That's sort of how I play anyway. Not that I set up rules for myself or anything, but aside from killstreaks I don't really use any of that stuff.
 

Tdc2182

New member
May 21, 2009
3,623
0
0
Contextualizer said:
Tdc2182 said:
Jonny49 said:
What ever happened to playing for fun?
This. I mean seriously no bling? That isn't exactly a cheap perk. I use that one because I just like having more than one attachment. None of those are exactly cheap either. I mean seriously, Has one man army ever actually annoyed any one?

Edit: I mean seriously
Not being cheap != being balanced.

I really feel like some of you really don't understand the idea of sports. This is no different.
Sports involves exercise. Video games are for recreation
 

Contextualizer

New member
Jan 8, 2010
600
0
0
Tdc2182 said:
Sports involves exercise. Video games are for recreation
So...you can't have recreational exercise? Or non-physical sports like tournament chess? Really?

Check that again:

Wiki said:
Sport is an activity that is governed by a set of rules or customs and often engaged in competitively. Sports commonly refer to activities where the physical capabilities of the competitor are the sole or primary determinant of the outcome (winning or losing), but the term is also used to include activities such as mind sports (a common name for some card games and board games with little to no element of chance) and motor sports where mental acuity or equipment quality are major factors.
chronobreak said:
Um... Sigh, read your quote. You place it squarely at the players. These are your exact words: "Or are the players just not "pro" enough?"

You say nothing about a league, and then quote me as if that's what you were trying to say. If so, you certainly should have said it much better, right?
Does the league play the games or do the players in the league?
 

Scrythe

Premium Gasoline
Jun 23, 2009
2,367
0
0
I only play by one rule: No excessive chatter, music or background noise, lest you be muted
Other than that, have fun!

I really dislike the term "professional gamer/gaming". It seems like a term slapped together to be pretentious, like "intellectual elite". The only way I can see anyone gaming "professionally" is if they get paid regularly to do it. And since I have yet to me a "professional gamer" who has received a cent for sitting on their ass playing video games just as much as you or I, I shall stick to that theory.

Another thing about "professional gamers". If they are so much better at it than anyone else, why must they constantly ban everything? I mean, sure I agree that the 1887 is overpowered and impractical, but if they weren't meant to be used, then why did the programmers include them and refuse to patch them out? Riot shields too: they are NOT that bad. If you are too stupid to figure out that you're not supposed to charge head-on into one, then maybe you have no business calling yourself a "professional".

Here, have some delicious CopyPasta:

Competitive Smash players suck. That's all there is to it.

They ban most of the stages because they suck. They suck at catching their opponents, so large stages are banned. They have to rely on cheating shit like chaingrabbing to be able to win, so stages with any kind of wall and walk-off edges are banned. They have no ability to dodge or use to their advantage the very telegraphed stage hazards, so any stages with them are banned. Which leaves them three or four stages with no variety, no strategy, and which imbalance the game even further because some characters don't play well on those stages.

They also can't handle the randomness of items. "A bomb could easily appear in front of me right when I attack!" So? An asteroid could have fallen on you and crushed you on your way to the tournament. Did it? No. "An item could appear right beside my opponent and give him the advantage!" It could also appear right next to you and give YOU the advantage. Or it could appear in the middle and the two of you would have to fight for it. You're skilled enough to do hoop-dee-whoop combos and wagga-dasheen around the stage, don't tell me you can't do something as simple as run to an item.

I was playing Brawl with a couple of campus res neighbors down the hall since I had nothing better to do. As soon as they turned on the game these two guys wouldn't stop complaining to the host about how much it sucks that he doesn't have Melee, and that they should just bring in a Gamecube sometime instead. I tuned them out.

I chose Captain Falcon, since I thought I was rather decent with him, and he's an awesome character in general. One of the two whiners just dropped his controller onto his lap and gave me a huge "What the fuck" look.

"Dude. Are you serious? Don't pick Captain Falcon, man."

"Why, what's wrong?"

"Don't be a scrub dude. Don't fucking pick Captain Falcon."

I almost choked on a laugh. I've heard about these so called "tourneyfags" on /v/, but I still had some doubt they actually existed outside of the Internet, much less the chance that I'll actually meet one. Curious, I decided to prode his limits a bit more. So I picked Metaknight instead.

"Uh, nope sorry dude. Metaknight's banned."

That was when the owner of the game pipes up.

"Wait what? What do you mean he's banned?"

"He's a fucking cheap character. It ruins the game, honestly. Don't play as Metaknight."

"Are you a fag? Just play the damned game, people can choose who they want. You're the one ruining the game."

The two of them then started arguing for real. Over a Wii game. The other whiner simply sat back and watched while the two of them mouth each other off. I was trying my hardest not to laugh throughout the whole thing, especially when I actually heard the terms "Hitstun" and "L-Canceling" being thrown out.

In the end I quelled the fighting by picking Ganondorf instead. The two whiners both picked Marth. The game owner picked Lucario. Long story short, I won. There was much rage. And I'm not allowed to play smash with the two anymore because I'm a "scrub" and a "newb".

I know the above stories have to do with SSB, but this generally applies to every competitive game that has this kind of userbase full of neckbeard tourneyfags and such. Hell, you see this on WoW with duels. "Rogue? No vanish!" "Pally? No heals or bubble!" "Lock? No fear!" These are abilities that make the class what it is. You take those out, and all you get are super nerfed warriors slamming on their Spacebar keys like it's an instant orgasm inducer.

When Street Fighter IV came out, most forums I frequented were full of "NERF ZANGIEF! HIS THROW IS OP!" And at least the people there had the sense to tell them "Look, just because you are too retarded to avoid a certain attack, doesn't mean the rest of the game should be dumbed down to your level." Games aren't public schools, people. They're not going to lower the standards just because someone refuses to use the block button or refuses to dash around a slow-moving riot shield or has completely shitty luck with getting a Pokeball or Smash Ball or whatever.

Fuck you. Let the rest of us enjoy our games.
 

CommyGingerbreadMan

New member
Dec 22, 2009
197
0
0
Contextualizer said:
Tdc2182 said:
Jonny49 said:
What ever happened to playing for fun?
This. I mean seriously no bling? That isn't exactly a cheap perk. I use that one because I just like having more than one attachment. None of those are exactly cheap either. I mean seriously, Has one man army ever actually annoyed any one?

Edit: I mean seriously
Not being cheap != being balanced.

I really feel like some of you really don't understand the idea of sports. This is no different.
Well come on, heartbeat sensor distracts so many people, I wonder why they use it, they spend more time looking at it then in front of them, so anyone with Ninja catches them COMPLETELY off guard. That's really the only reason I see them Banning Bling, to get rid of Heartbeat Sensor combos. . . One Man army does Perplex me.

"WTF HOWD I DIE. OH OF COURSE THE EFFIN BIZNATCH HAD ONE MAN ARMY."
 

twostripe

New member
Oct 27, 2009
106
0
0
i could see it as a playlist but really people take COD and a lot of other games way to seriously, like when theres a 10th prestige in the room and everyone has to flame them cus hes played the game more than they have

another reason to avoid mainstream games
YAY ARMORED CORE
 

twostripe

New member
Oct 27, 2009
106
0
0
Contextualizer said:
Tdc2182 said:
Sports involves exercise. Video games are for recreation
So...you can't have recreational exercise? Or non-physical sports like tournament chess? Really?

Check that again:

Wiki said:
Sport is an activity that is governed by a set of rules or customs and often engaged in competitively. Sports commonly refer to activities where the physical capabilities of the competitor are the sole or primary determinant of the outcome (winning or losing), but the term is also used to include activities such as mind sports (a common name for some card games and board games with little to no element of chance) and motor sports where mental acuity or equipment quality are major factors.
chronobreak said:
Um... Sigh, read your quote. You place it squarely at the players. These are your exact words: "Or are the players just not "pro" enough?"

You say nothing about a league, and then quote me as if that's what you were trying to say. If so, you certainly should have said it much better, right?
Does the league play the games or do the players in the league?

chess is not a sport and anyone who says it is probably thinks so because they cant play a real sport. it really does offend me when people call themselves athletes for chess or something lame like that