This has to make sense eventually

Recommended Videos

Onyx Oblivion

Borderlands Addict. Again.
Sep 9, 2008
17,032
0
0
Sexual Harassment Panda said:
Onyx Oblivion said:
what the fuck do Link and Mario keep saving the fucking princess for?
Been thinking this for a while. Love your new avatar by the way, makes me feel like obeying you.
GIVE ME YOUR CREDIT CARD INFORMATION
 

orangebandguy

Elite Member
Jan 9, 2009
3,117
0
41
I could never get into Northern Lights for some reason, I was having sick leave and started reading it and none of it went in. Up to the point where I unfairly hated the book for just being near me.

I'd probably read it now, I'm all about the second chances me.
 

Avatar Roku

New member
Jul 9, 2008
6,169
0
0
ElephantGuts said:
orannis62 said:
ElephantGuts said:
Well there's this game called Modern Warfare 2...

If that game had writers they all must have been incapacitated or semi-so throughout the course of the game's development. Either that or they were farm animals or were intellectually equivalent to a farm animal.
*sigh*This again. Alright, what didn't you understand? It wasn't presented in the best possible ways, but the story is coherent, I assure you.
The story was neither sensical, well-presented, or tactful.

Take, say, "No Russian" (For anyone else reading this-SPOILERS).

Makarov was clearly a well-know, easily identified Russian terrorist. During the attack he wore no mask, and must have been picked up by dozens of security camers within and outside the airport. Survivors would have seen the same. It would have been obvious he committed the attack. But because they find one American body there, they decide the Americans launched the attack?

Besides, how did they know he was American? He was a deep undercover CIA operative, I doubt he had his US passport or driver's license in his wallet, nor could they dissect his vocal cords and found out he spoke English. And even if they did find out an American was part of the attack, how in the hell would that lead to one superpower invading another? That man does not represent the entire United States.

Or take Captain Price. He launches a nuke that blows up in the upper atmosphere, or an EMP warhead or something. It looked pretty awesome. Now...what did that accomplish? Really? Wow, Washington D.C. has no power now. The Russians are going to give up their invasion of the entire country and go home?

Also, of course, smaller questions. What the hell was the ACS module, and how did it help the Russians invade the US (as I assume was what was supposed to happen) if it was recovered? Whatever happened with the Brazilian arms dealer? Who was that Raptor guy you were protecting? What was the importance of the guy in the saferoom and his briefcase? How did Russia manage to invade the United States, with the most powerful military in the world, at will? Such a massive operation would be a tactical and logistical nightmare, and probably almost impossible. Where was the entire US Navy or Air Force, and the US's nuclear weapons stockpiles?

Oh yeah. Why the HELL did General whats-his-face kill a bunch of international special forces soldiers? What did that accomplish for him? They were certainly only helping him and didn't seem to pose a threat in any way. And what about that "Shadow Company" you fight in the last mission or two? Where did they come from? Are they Shepherd's (I just remembered his name) personal company of bodyguards or something? Shouldn't they have been introduced sometime so we know who we are fighting? And whatever happened to Makarov? He was made out to be the game's main antagonist, and then he's completely forgotten about for some US general. That was...a satisfying conclusion?

I shouldn't have these many questions from a campaign that was so damn short. There were many more things that didn't make sense than things that did. Plot concepts started and ended abruptly and seemingly at random. Things rarely went anywhere or tied together. The campaign looked and played great, but there was simply no writing. If this is considered good storytelling I may as well render myself deaf, dumb and blind and go live in a cave somewhere.
As I said, the storytelling left quite a bit to be desired, all I was saying was that, after some analysis, the story isn't that bad. I'll use spoilers as well.
You forget, Makarov was an Ultranationalist, who control the Russian government at the time. I'm not going to say the government was likely thrilled about his attack on the airport, but Makarov basically left them with two options: tell the world that a member of their camp led a heinous assault on their own airport, or use Allen as an out. Even if the Russian government knows it really wasn't America's fault, public furor would basically ensure that they had to invade. Hell, it's even possible that they ordered Makarov to do it, wanting a pretext to invade the US (again, these are the Ultranationalists from the first game).

As for the Captain Price thing, he launched a nuke so that the EM pulse would knock out the Russian's advance (nukes are the most efficient man-made way of creating EMP, and a high altitude detonation would leave no fallout). Think about it: they now have no vehicles and are knee-deep in enemy territory. Their defeat would be a matter of when, not if. As for the Russians in the other part of the country, there were none. They only attacked DC and the areas around it, what we see in the brief before the first mission in America was them using the ACS module (more on that below) for a diversion, essentially shutting down the American recon sats.

The ACS module was something from a crashed American recon sat which had been recovered by the Russians. Essentially, it would give access to the American sat network, meaning it had to be recovered (which is what happened in Cliffhanger). However, one of two things happened: Either the Russians copied the module before it was stolen (the original theory put forth when the invasion started) or, more likely, it was just handed straight back to them by Shepherd.

Rojas (the arms dealer) told 141 about the prisoner who Makarov hated in the Gulag. A little anti-climactic, but it still works.

If TvTropes is to be believed, the general consensus is that Raptor is the President. They were quite adamant about protecting him, and it's possible to get a slight glance at him which supports it.

We aren't told who the man in the safe house is, but he was there for two reasons. 1)The men who killed him had tattoos just like the ones Allen had to get before No Russian. Therefore, it's implied that they were Makarov's personal men. 2)There was no sign of forced entry. This hints at Shepherd's involvement.

As for the invasion, I think we can chalk that up to Willing Suspension of Disbelief.

141 were loose ends. They would likely figure out Shepard's involvement from his next moves and, as Price demonstrated in the mission where he launches the nuke, they can get around just fine without him. From his perspective, they were more trouble than they were worth, especially since he had Shadow Company. And yes, it's mentioned in one of the early missions (in passing, but still) that they are his personal troops.

I assume you noticed the large cliffhanger at the end, right? Well, seems to me that Makarov is being set up as the Big Bad for MW3. As for why they go after Shepherd instead of him, his was the more immediate threat, the plan already in motion.
 

hermes

New member
Mar 2, 2009
3,865
0
0
Trivun said:
MGS4. Yeah. I went there.
The ending in particular was the longest, senseless diarrea of words I have seen this side of Quentin Tarantino.

In movies, I will go with the last Pirates of the Caribean. Nice action sequences, but the story had more twists than a spaghetti dish, and half of the times they lead nowhere...
 

Avatar Roku

New member
Jul 9, 2008
6,169
0
0
xqxm said:
Well, i decided to, by popular demand, read Ender's Game. I found it an amazing read, and finished it in 2-3 sessions. I then picked up Speaker for the Dead and promptly put it down with a resounding thud a few chapters later.
Yeah, the entire series, aside from the original, is incredibly polarizing. I personally liked it, but I know a lot of people who didn't.
 

Pifflestick

New member
Jun 10, 2008
312
0
0
Borat made no sense to me. Both the plot and the fact that people found that garbage funny still eludes me.
 
Apr 24, 2008
3,912
0
0
Onyx Oblivion said:
Sexual Harassment Panda said:
Onyx Oblivion said:
what the fuck do Link and Mario keep saving the fucking princess for?
Been thinking this for a while. Love your new avatar by the way, makes me feel like obeying you.
GIVE ME YOUR CREDIT CARD INFORMATION
I would but I've already given them to a Nigerian businessman and a member of the Libyan royal family, today. I saw my friends PIN code over her shoulder earlier though. You can help me jump her for her card and a percentage of the ill gotten booty.
 

Acier

New member
Nov 5, 2009
1,300
0
0
the film Primer

however once I brushed up on my physics I could follow it better

Donnie Darko was hard for me to follow when I was a lot younger, but I watched the Directors cut recently and everything just made so much more sense
 

Kiefer13

Wizzard
Jul 31, 2008
1,548
0
0
hermes200 said:
Kiefer13 said:
Lost.

Beat that.
I can do that with two words: The X-Files...
Hmm, Touché .

I admit, I never did watch that many episodes of The X-Files (even though my mother was a huge fan), but those I did watch were strange indeed. I probably should at some point, I remember enjoying them nevertheless.
 

Nigh Invulnerable

New member
Jan 5, 2009
2,500
0
0
Captain Pancake said:
Catch-22 made no sense to me. I have to write a damn timed essay about it in 4 days time too, so shows my preparation...

I kid, I kid, I know nobody understood that book.

Still kidding, I understand it fine.
That book is completely awesome. It took me a pretty thorough read through to really get it, and now it's one of my favorites.

I watched "Cat Soup". That movie made sense for maybe 3 seconds in its 30 minutes. Giant joint-wizard who runs a circus and speaks in weird balloons that form a flood? Yeah.....
 

ElephantGuts

New member
Jul 9, 2008
3,520
0
0
orannis62 said:
As I said, the storytelling left quite a bit to be desired, all I was saying was that, after some analysis, the story isn't that bad. I'll use spoilers as well.
You forget, Makarov was an Ultranationalist, who control the Russian government at the time. I'm not going to say the government was likely thrilled about his attack on the airport, but Makarov basically left them with two options: tell the world that a member of their camp led a heinous assault on their own airport, or use Allen as an out. Even if the Russian government knows it really wasn't America's fault, public furor would basically ensure that they had to invade. Hell, it's even possible that they ordered Makarov to do it, wanting a pretext to invade the US (again, these are the Ultranationalists from the first game).

As for the Captain Price thing, he launched a nuke so that the EM pulse would knock out the Russian's advance (nukes are the most efficient man-made way of creating EMP, and a high altitude detonation would leave no fallout). Think about it: they now have no vehicles and are knee-deep in enemy territory. Their defeat would be a matter of when, not if. As for the Russians in the other part of the country, there were none. They only attacked DC and the areas around it, what we see in the brief before the first mission in America was them using the ACS module (more on that below) for a diversion, essentially shutting down the American recon sats.

The ACS module was something from a crashed American recon sat which had been recovered by the Russians. Essentially, it would give access to the American sat network, meaning it had to be recovered (which is what happened in Cliffhanger). However, one of two things happened: Either the Russians copied the module before it was stolen (the original theory put forth when the invasion started) or, more likely, it was just handed straight back to them by Shepherd.

Rojas (the arms dealer) told 141 about the prisoner who Makarov hated in the Gulag. A little anti-climactic, but it still works.

If TvTropes is to be believed, the general consensus is that Raptor is the President. They were quite adamant about protecting him, and it's possible to get a slight glance at him which supports it.

We aren't told who the man in the safe house is, but he was there for two reasons. 1)The men who killed him had tattoos just like the ones Allen had to get before No Russian. Therefore, it's implied that they were Makarov's personal men. 2)There was no sign of forced entry. This hints at Shepherd's involvement.

As for the invasion, I think we can chalk that up to Willing Suspension of Disbelief.

141 were loose ends. They would likely figure out Shepard's involvement from his next moves and, as Price demonstrated in the mission where he launches the nuke, they can get around just fine without him. From his perspective, they were more trouble than they were worth, especially since he had Shadow Company. And yes, it's mentioned in one of the early missions (in passing, but still) that they are his personal troops.

I assume you noticed the large cliffhanger at the end, right? Well, seems to me that Makarov is being set up as the Big Bad for MW3. As for why they go after Shepherd instead of him, his was the more immediate threat, the plan already in motion.
Oh wow. You seem to have figured out a lot more than me. Did I just miss all that (things like the ACS module's explanation, Raptor being implied to be the president, Rojas telling about 141, etc.) in the game or did you find them out somewhere else?

And I doubt the Russians didn't want to portray Makarov in a "bad" light since he was already a known devious terrorist, but I guess if IW says being a Russian Ultranationalist means having an overpowerering hunger for American blood I can't fight that.

But I don't understand the deal with Shepherd. Exactly what was he trying to do? What "involvement" was he doing? I couldn't have missed that much in the game. And I suppose Makarov was left to be dealt with in the next game, but I feel like they should have alluded to it more. He just exits with a random line of dialogue, and then you kill Shepherd and it seems like you won, with no mention of Makarov again. I suppose I'll just chalk that up to bad presentation as you said.
 

ultracheeser

New member
Jul 2, 2009
348
0
0
Mr Smile said:
Shoot em up most awesome messy retarded movie ever

man finds pregnant woman
(carrot through bad mans head)
fire fight

woman dead man left holding baby

goes to brothel to give baby to prostitute

man baby and prostitute go on adventure together

naked fire fight

evil guy trys to kill baby to kill politisoin

fire fight

baby and prostetute go live in a tank

fire fight

man kill politisoin jump out plane

mid-air fire fight

man blows docters face off

man blows evil guys innards out

man prostitute and baby live happily ever after

the end
what's a politisoin?
 

ultracheeser

New member
Jul 2, 2009
348
0
0
Haunted Serenity said:
The Departed...i could't understand why my mother recomened me to watch it...
I enjoyed that movie. It was really well done. I had to rent it, because I would always catch the last bit of the movie.
 

whycantibelinus

New member
Sep 29, 2009
997
0
0
Onyx Oblivion said:
what the fuck do Link and Mario keep saving the fucking princess for?
Well Link is restoring balance to nature and preventing world domination by an evil genius. Mario, on the other hand, is simply looking to get laid while Bowser is depriving him of his live in pussy.

Both noble goals in my opinion.
 

Avatar Roku

New member
Jul 9, 2008
6,169
0
0
ElephantGuts said:
orannis62 said:
As I said, the storytelling left quite a bit to be desired, all I was saying was that, after some analysis, the story isn't that bad. I'll use spoilers as well.
You forget, Makarov was an Ultranationalist, who control the Russian government at the time. I'm not going to say the government was likely thrilled about his attack on the airport, but Makarov basically left them with two options: tell the world that a member of their camp led a heinous assault on their own airport, or use Allen as an out. Even if the Russian government knows it really wasn't America's fault, public furor would basically ensure that they had to invade. Hell, it's even possible that they ordered Makarov to do it, wanting a pretext to invade the US (again, these are the Ultranationalists from the first game).

As for the Captain Price thing, he launched a nuke so that the EM pulse would knock out the Russian's advance (nukes are the most efficient man-made way of creating EMP, and a high altitude detonation would leave no fallout). Think about it: they now have no vehicles and are knee-deep in enemy territory. Their defeat would be a matter of when, not if. As for the Russians in the other part of the country, there were none. They only attacked DC and the areas around it, what we see in the brief before the first mission in America was them using the ACS module (more on that below) for a diversion, essentially shutting down the American recon sats.

The ACS module was something from a crashed American recon sat which had been recovered by the Russians. Essentially, it would give access to the American sat network, meaning it had to be recovered (which is what happened in Cliffhanger). However, one of two things happened: Either the Russians copied the module before it was stolen (the original theory put forth when the invasion started) or, more likely, it was just handed straight back to them by Shepherd.

Rojas (the arms dealer) told 141 about the prisoner who Makarov hated in the Gulag. A little anti-climactic, but it still works.

If TvTropes is to be believed, the general consensus is that Raptor is the President. They were quite adamant about protecting him, and it's possible to get a slight glance at him which supports it.

We aren't told who the man in the safe house is, but he was there for two reasons. 1)The men who killed him had tattoos just like the ones Allen had to get before No Russian. Therefore, it's implied that they were Makarov's personal men. 2)There was no sign of forced entry. This hints at Shepherd's involvement.

As for the invasion, I think we can chalk that up to Willing Suspension of Disbelief.

141 were loose ends. They would likely figure out Shepard's involvement from his next moves and, as Price demonstrated in the mission where he launches the nuke, they can get around just fine without him. From his perspective, they were more trouble than they were worth, especially since he had Shadow Company. And yes, it's mentioned in one of the early missions (in passing, but still) that they are his personal troops.

I assume you noticed the large cliffhanger at the end, right? Well, seems to me that Makarov is being set up as the Big Bad for MW3. As for why they go after Shepherd instead of him, his was the more immediate threat, the plan already in motion.
Oh wow. You seem to have figured out a lot more than me. Did I just miss all that (things like the ACS module's explanation, Raptor being implied to be the president, Rojas telling about 141, etc.) in the game or did you find them out somewhere else?

And I doubt the Russians didn't want to portray Makarov in a "bad" light since he was already a known devious terrorist, but I guess if IW says being a Russian Ultranationalist means having an overpowerering hunger for American blood I can't fight that.

But I don't understand the deal with Shepherd. Exactly what was he trying to do? What "involvement" was he doing? I couldn't have missed that much in the game. And I suppose Makarov was left to be dealt with in the next game, but I feel like they should have alluded to it more. He just exits with a random line of dialogue, and then you kill Shepherd and it seems like you won, with no mention of Makarov again. I suppose I'll just chalk that up to bad presentation as you said.
The ACS Module and Rojas telling Soap about the Gulag were explicitly mentioned in-game, I just read about Raptor seeming to be the President on TvTropes, and that entire explanation about No Russian was just balls-out speculation.

As I said, my explanation of No Russian was all extrapolation, although I agree that it's a little weak to have the entire motivation of the Big Bad as "he belongs to this faction."

As for Shepherd, there were several reasons. First, he wanted power, in the form of the "blank check" that was given to him to deal with Makarov. Don't think I have to explain that one too much. Second, he had wanted to go to war with Russia ever since the nuke (which killed a lot of his men) from the first game was traced back to Russia. This also leads to his "involvement": he and Makarov shared something of a common goal, in that they wanted their respective countries to be at war with one another. So, Shepherd gave the Russians back the ACS module, told Makarov about Allen, and possibly more that we aren't told about (that partnership also explains why Makarov knew where to find Shepherd at the end when Price called him). And it was all there in the hard drive Roach was carrying when he was killed. He couldn't risk that getting out, and as I explained above, he probably felt he didn't need 141 anymore since he had Shadow Company.
 

Aerodyamic

New member
Aug 14, 2009
1,205
0
0
The first time I watch the original Heavy Metal movie, I just didn't get it. Having watched it without any perception-altering chemicals might have been the problem, but the second time through, it made complete sense.

There was also some right screwed up movie about raves,people trying to make quick cash selling Extasy, and some broad accidentally running over her (former) Extasy dealing, right at the end. Basically, the story showed what I thought was a flashback of him getting run over, then suddenly started telling the stories of a bunch of (supposedly) unconnected people, and how the events on that day led to this girl running the drug dealer over.

Fucked. Right. Up.
 

Rawker

New member
Jun 24, 2009
1,115
0
0
The Shining. I liked it, because there were some memorable quotes, but were there ghosts? were they crazy? who knows, please tell..
 

wax88

New member
Sep 10, 2009
226
0
0
Haunted Serenity said:
The Departed...i could't understand why my mother recomened me to watch it...
then should watch the original version from which that movie is based on. It's a hong kong flick called infernal affairs and trust me, it was better. just as long as you're ok with reading subtitles.