Time Traveler Caught on Film,OLD Film

Recommended Videos

KiruTheMant

New member
Nov 2, 2009
1,946
0
0
Link to original Article: http://www.unexplainable.net/Simply-Unexplainable/Is-This-a-Time-Traveller.shtml

The above photograph has been seen circulating through internet forums, and even enjoyed some limited news coverage. But who is this mysterious figure wearing modern clothes and paying close attention to an event taking place somewhere off camera? The photograph has caused several to speculate that the man depicted may be a time traveler caught unaware at an event that bears no historical significance.

The story idea is certainly an intriguing one. A time traveler is depicted in a photograph performing a task that turns out in our world to be completely mundane, but in the world he came from that event may have been significant in some way until he made some simple change. How many photographs are there of the night Hitler was born? And had he not gone on to cause the worst war in the history of the world, would this event have even been remembered? In other words, if a time traveler had stopped Hitler at a young age, history would have never remembered the event as anything more than an untimely death among millions of others. So where is the photograph from? And is it digitally altered?


In November of 1940 in the town of South Fork, there was a flood that closed the South Fork Bridge cutting off traffic from the town for a number of days and isolating the community. When the dedication ceremony allowed the residents of South Fork to use the bridge once again a crowd formed to celebrate the event. And among them was a tall unshaven mysterious man, walking unnoticed through the crowd. He carried in his hands an unusually small camera and beneath a wool lined coat he wore a T-shirt with a simple letter M on it. The only known record of his presence in the town of South Fork is a single photograph of the crowd as they watched the ribbon cutting of the bridge in anticipation.



Experts looking over the photograph have determined that the subject is not digitally inserted. And the photo has been under the ownership of one of the members of the virtual museum of Canada since 2002, and has been in the public eye since 2004 when it first started making the paranormal circuit. The man is the very picture of stereotypical "incognito while time traveling." Many observers have noted the size and shape of the man's camera declaring it to be more akin to a modern SLR camera, rather than the billows cameras of the 1940's. Looking over camera models of the 1940's however, I found a close resemblance between the camera the time man is holding and the Ansco Pioneer which was available in 1947. Of course the photograph was taken in 1941, making this exact model unlikely.

And of course there are the myriad problems with conventional time travel as it has been understood by the general public. If the time traveler were to go back in time, would he create a paradox by inadvertently preventing his own birth? Conventional wisdom says yes, but quantum theory suggests it may not be that simple. A time traveler in a multi-verse scenario would create a new universe just by integrating his own form into his own past. And of course it would be impossible to return to his point of origin, as an infinite number of universes are created each millisecond. So there is never paradox, because any one universe exists only for the blink of an eye before diverging and branching off in every imaginable direction.

But what happened to the man in dark sunglasses? And who was he?
 

tomtom94

aka "Who?"
May 11, 2009
3,373
0
0
Nice story.

I personally will believe time travel when it happens to me or if I see it with my own eyes. For now, it should stick to being subject material for (GOOD) comedy and drama movies.
 

Trivun

Stabat mater dolorosa
Dec 13, 2008
9,831
0
0
It's Photoshopped. Or, since it costs so much and is therefore inaccessible for most non-professionals, it's more accurate to say this photo has been GIMPed.

Seriously, it's doing the rounds on the internet, of all places. If it was in something like a scientific journal, then I'd be less skeptical. But this is an obvious fake. A very well-done fake. But a fake nonetheless...
 

Trivun

Stabat mater dolorosa
Dec 13, 2008
9,831
0
0
tomtom94 said:
Nice story.

I personally will believe time travel when it happens to me or if I see it with my own eyes. For now, it should stick to being subject material for (GOOD) comedy and drama movies.
Heh, on that note there'sa film being released soon about three grown men and a teenager more awkward than McLovin who travel back to the Eighties. In a frekin' hot tub, of all things. The name of the movie is 'Time Travel Hot Tub'. And that's no lie, I actually saw the full trailer for it last night when I was seeing Cemetery Junction...
 

SteinFaust

New member
Jun 30, 2008
1,078
0
0
even if there WAS a time traveler, i'm sure he would have done something a little more exciting than attend a bridge opening.
 

AndyFromMonday

New member
Feb 5, 2009
3,921
0
0
KiruCookie said:
Experts looking over the photograph have determined that the subject is not digitally inserted.
What experts? Again, you can do this extremely easily using photoshop. Until *actual* experts rule out the possibility of a digital insertion then this picture is a fake.


Wait a minute. This is what says at the bottom of the article:

"Update: Our newest Isochronic Recordings use equal intensity tone that pulsate. The frequency pulsing recordings will instantly put you in an altered state of consciousness where you can develop spiritual abilities, reach new planes of existence, and so much more.. This newest technology will blow your mind. Full information is available at The Unexplainable Store."

I'm seriously calling bullshit on this one.
 

Soxafloppin

Coxa no longer floppin'
Jun 22, 2009
7,918
0
0
I love a good shoop me!

It's a pretty good idea for a photo i have to give it that!
 

TechniMan

New member
Apr 1, 2010
6
0
0
As a student physicist: I think you may have your understanding of quantum/multiverse theory just a little messed up...
And surely the blink of an eye would take many milliseconds (1ms = 0.001s), according to your statement passing through many different universes, not just one?
I'm sorry, but I'm finding way too much nonsensical crazy-madness in your statements to bother thinking any more of it.

So yeah, I've got to agree that they must've been edited in. Or if not, then did the 'professionals' ever think it could be staged (if they didn't do this all themselves)?
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,977
0
0
Well, the T-shirt was invented around WW1, and his sweater looks like an old wool sweater, maybe he just had a bizarre style for the time?

My Opa also has a German camera from the 1930s that is about the size of what he's holding.
For example the ARGUS MODEL AF is from 1937:


Also, polarized sunglasses were invented in 1936. I'm just saying it's not inconceivable that someone just dressed like that because he wanted to. There have always been radical stylists and rebel youths, even in ancient greece. I'm just throwing it out there that the odds he was just trying to define his own style are a lot better than that he's a time traveler caught on film at some random bridge opening in shit all nowhere.
 

SnipErlite

New member
Aug 16, 2009
3,147
0
0
It's 'shopped. I can tell from the pixels and having seem some 'shops in my time.


............sorry yeah.

Anyway, erm who knows? Maybe it is/was a time traveller, maybe just some guy.

Or a damn good edit.
 

000Ronald

New member
Mar 7, 2008
2,167
0
0
I find it odd that there are no names named and no links to these professionals or news attentions. Based on that alone, I'm going to label this as either doctored or not a time traveler.

And I don't see the camera this guy is supposed to be holding.

Third, there's the possibility this guy is a troll. I'm not sure, so I decided to take a third route and tell everyone.

'pologies.
 

Matt_LRR

Unequivocal Fan Favorite
Nov 30, 2009
1,260
0
0
The photograph is legit, comes from a canadian museum.

As it turns out, historians have noted that the guy is not wearing any single item that is out of period, it's just that the combination and the fact that he's so out of place in the crowd make him look way ahead of his time.

http://gizmodo.com/5519660/time-traveler-captured-in-museum-photograph

-m
 

Quaxar

New member
Sep 21, 2009
3,949
0
0
AC10 said:
Well, the T-shirt was invented around WW1, and his sweater looks like an old wool sweater, maybe he just had a bizarre style for the time?
Yeah, I had the same idea. He's not exactly wearing rings ('cause you know... they are uncool in the future) or an exo-skeletton with railguns.
Not to forget, if I'd travel back in time I'd try to blend in with the crowd, not wear a "I'm a time traveller (Shhhhhhhh)"-shirt.
 

Matt_LRR

Unequivocal Fan Favorite
Nov 30, 2009
1,260
0
0
Lemon Of Life said:
That is very well done. I'd love it if it were true.
it's not fake. The fact that he's a time-traveller is. The picture itself is not.

-m