Title of thread. Reason. No namecalling. No drama. Pretty much the same as most posts.Knight Templar said:What is the etiquette concerning PM'ing a mod about a thread, that I think is in need of attention?
Title of thread. Reason. No namecalling. No drama. Pretty much the same as most posts.Knight Templar said:What is the etiquette concerning PM'ing a mod about a thread, that I think is in need of attention?
I'm not party to who locked your thread, but the promotion of illegalities may just well be why it was locked.Catchphrase said:I still need to find the staff that locked my thread though, without giving a reason. I'm not going to sit idly by without a reason, but will accept any valid reason without complaint.
Another user that is trying to play the victim and failing - if its in the rules they can lock your thread. You broke said rules therefore your thread gets locked - its amazing how many people don't seem to understand this simple process...Catchphrase said:You're not setting an example by locking my thread, you're just being overly sensitive on a subject that is considered taboo.
Yes I am on both counts.Catchphrase said:Stop being a condescending jerk. You're not "cool" because you act tough on the internet.
You're also misunderstanding me.
Well its quite simple really, one is the theft of digital media and abusing substances, whilst the other is drinking a legal drug at an age at which it is illegal, and taking substances.I can see the validity in the reason, what I cannot see is the difference between two different "illegal acts" (In this case piracy and drug-use, and underage drinking and drug-use).
The thing is, a great proportion of those threads, that I have seen have been locked - as was yours.This especially since I, in my original post for the thread, announced that I did not want to encourage the usage of drugs. Much unlike some of the drinking threads that pretty much encourage underage drinking, and the many threads and users that openly condone piracy.
Who me?!And furthermore, I know you posses some form of common sense,
True, but I don't think you should take the comment too literally, I believe its an attempt at claiming the sites image is important.FOX news could make a "SENSATIONAL NEWS STORY" about pretty much any thread in the offtopic forum. We both know this.
Indeed, I was wondering at the irony about being banned from a seemingly innocuous post on a thread which has alluded to the same thing.Shapsters said:See up there, at pimppeter. A little note like that is perfect and fully effective! I was wondering to myself what injustice it was that he was banned them BAM! he posted pornography! Thanks Mods!
It's just a simple probation, kid. It' no big deal.Multi-Kill said:I'd like to be added to as I feel I was wrongly put on probation for doing to opposite of what I was trying to do, and because the mods haven't contacted me back on the message I sent them stating why I felt I did'nt deserve to be probated.
Multi-Kill said:I was'nt trying to enforce them, I was trying to un-enforce them! I was trying to give them a taste of their own medicine.berethond said:It's just a simple probation, kid. It' no big deal.Multi-Kill said:I'd like to be added to as I feel I was wrongly put on probation for doing to opposite of what I was trying to do, and because the mods haven't contacted me back on the message I sent them stating why I felt I did'nt deserve to be probated.
And, asking people who the biggest troll was is just ASKING for trouble, now, isn't it?
It just gives them the attention they want.
I'm basing my opinion off of only just reading the posts that got their respective posters banned. Using the word 'Christian' as an insult isn't a big deal, as he was using it in the same sense that everyone uses 'retarded' or 'gay' as an insult. If anyone is mad that he said that... it's really their problem, because it's a double standard to be mad about 'Christian' and not 'retarded'.Ultrajoe said:His comments on how he believed everyone who commits suicide is a coward who deserves to die might have had an effect. That and accusing people of bestiality. I suppose insinuating we should use the word 'Christian' as an insult might have affected the decision. The attacking other people on sight, that might have been involved.Xojins said:I don't know... Necroswanson's post doesn't really seem like it deserves a perm-ban, but at least a suspension. But I can't really understand why Darth Mobius was banned. It really doesn't make sense to me.
The fact that he did all this within 32 hours, and that it was far from the first time? That might have sealed it.
You misunderstand, I think using any of those terms, and others, as an insult is a bannable offence.Xojins said:I'm basing my opinion off of only just reading the posts that got their respective posters banned. Using the word 'Christian' as an insult isn't a big deal, as he was using it in the same sense that everyone uses 'retarded' or 'gay' as an insult. If anyone is mad that he said that... it's really their problem, because it's a double standard to be mad about 'Christian' and not 'retarded'.
Yeah, folks around here get annoyed when users use "gay" and "retarded" as insults. Singling out an entire group of religious folks (of which I am one) and using that as an insult was rather venomous. Certainly not intended to promote intelligent, respectful discussion. Besides, it's not like the other stuff Mobius said was so very nice. I dare say the permaban was merited in this case.Ultrajoe said:You misunderstand, I think using any of those terms, and others, as an insult is a bannable offence.Xojins said:I'm basing my opinion off of only just reading the posts that got their respective posters banned. Using the word 'Christian' as an insult isn't a big deal, as he was using it in the same sense that everyone uses 'retarded' or 'gay' as an insult. If anyone is mad that he said that... it's really their problem, because it's a double standard to be mad about 'Christian' and not 'retarded'.
And Mobius was banned for his history, in addition to that one post.