So...what you're saying is PC FPS's are far superior over consoles because of...graphics? Maybe it's just me, but I don't really care for systematically setting fire to my money to continuously buy new graphics cards and whatnot. Don't get me wrong, I own both PC and console FPS's and have enjoyed both, but I'll just make that one purchase for a PS3 and save a whole lot more money if the only consequence is a slight graphical downgrade (and in this day and age, how much better are they honestly going to get?).PwnStar said:Firstly let me point out that a truly great FPS has to be on a PC and not a console game
As you dont really aim on a console, you need a mouse for that. For all those who said |Halo you are the type of person stook in the matrix whilst Neo and niobi fight to save your ass! You will never know Halo was over hyped, poorly made copy of much better games, (like all ms stuff) it wasnt the first, it wasnt the best, it was just the most advertised to fat yank brats who had shiney new consoles to wank over whilst mom made them more burgers. It has such a following purly as it was most people's first FPS game to which it does deserve credit for the rise of FPS games but its actual graphics, weapons, netcode, balance and playability were many evolutions behind the PC gamers and consoles always will be. When you think that the PS3 has a 10 year life cycle imagine how pants the graphics will be in 8 years time! whilst the PC will have evolved for 8 more years and be lifelike, the cutting edge console graphics of today are dated in 18 months, yet your forced to wait 10 years for an upgrade. Whilst graphics cards on PCs come out newer and faster every 4 months or so.
Oh i seemed to of missed out on that particular gaming nirvana COS ITS RUBBISH!!Ever tried to find all the terminals in Halo 3? No? Then shut the fuck up. Moreover, the graphics on the Halo games were actually quite good
You, stop talking out your biased arse. FPS does not stand for PC First Person Shooter, it stands for FIRST PERSON SHOOTER. So any game that is first person and involves shooting is viable in this thread.PwnStar said:Firstly let me point out that a truly great FPS has to be on a PC and not a console game
As you dont really aim on a console, you need a mouse for that. For all those who said |Halo you are the type of person stook in the matrix whilst Neo and niobi fight to save your ass! You will never know Halo was over hyped, poorly made copy of much better games, (like all ms stuff) it wasnt the first, it wasnt the best, it was just the most advertised to fat yank brats who had shiney new consoles to wank over whilst mom made them more burgers. It has such a following purly as it was most people's first FPS game to which it does deserve credit for the rise of FPS games but its actual graphics, weapons, netcode, balance and playability were many evolutions behind the PC gamers and consoles always will be. When you think that the PS3 has a 10 year life cycle imagine how pants the graphics will be in 8 years time! whilst the PC will have evolved for 8 more years and be lifelike, the cutting edge console graphics of today are dated in 18 months, yet your forced to wait 10 years for an upgrade. Whilst graphics cards on PCs come out newer and faster every 4 months or so.
The one guy who said PORTAL needs a labotomy, great game but not an FPS in anyone else book but yours. Its a puzzle game.
Now to the real list of best FPS's
As a FPS gamer for 20 years ive been there from the start and ive played them all. I also have had a hand in making half the games mentioned here although i wont go into detail. Goldeneye was the first true multiplayer and deserves a mention in any of these lists. ID say overall best ever would be
COD 4the first 3 were pants but they hit the sweet spot with that game. Wether its single or multiplayer, on console or PC, this game is superb all the other games are great at one thing but not great at them all, although without quake, counter-strike series, Unreal series, and the battlefield series it would never of gotten to that status, all of these games were once the greatest but nothing currently compares to cod 4 although COD 5 is looking good in testing.
FEAR was excellent as an actually scarey riviting story, it should of come with a free nappy.
Far cry and crysis for graphically beauty (free tissues)and
BIOSHOCK is the best immersion fantasy world ive ever been in (free LSD).
the cartoon styling of Team fortress games is great as is the olde style of DoD Valve make such top quality stuff.
And im getting a little sick of your stereotyping.PwnStar said:Oh i seemed to of missed out on that particular gaming nirvana COS ITS RUBBISH!!Ever tried to find all the terminals in Halo 3? No? Then shut the fuck up. Moreover, the graphics on the Halo games were actually quite good
that or your the blind fat yank fan boy i was referring to earlier but don't know it and your angry at me for pointing out that truth ...as such your not worth arguing with, cry to your mum when she brings the next shovel full of junk food , she might care what you think...
EzraPound said:- Wolfenstein 3D
- DOOM
- GoldenEye 007
- SW: Jedi Knight: Dark Forces II
- Half-Life
- System Shock 2
- Deux Ex
- Metroid Prime
- Half-Life 2
- BioShock
TheGreenManalishi said:Metroid Prime, Perfect Dark, GoldenEye, Jedi Knight II, Turok 2
Haha, good catch. It is indeed, my bad. Everytime I see FPS I just think shooters in general.Hunde Des Krieg said:Isn't Max Payne 3rd person?kewlrabbit said:I've gotta say Max Payne and Bioshock. Not for one particular reason, but both of the games were just so well done. Kinda atmospheric, like it draws you into the game world, especially Max Payne with the film noir cutscenes.
The first few Turok games were pretty good for their time.AfricanSwallow said:TheGreenManalishi said:Metroid Prime, Perfect Dark, GoldenEye, Jedi Knight II, Turok 2
... might be drawing off topic a bit, but Turok?
Really?
I'd rate the Turok games in my list of worst FPS games. (And probably high on the Worst Overall as well)
What was I missing?