Beautiful End said:
Personally, I would choose Twilight. I enjoyed reading the books because I always thought they had potential. If the author would have chosen to take a different approach, the series would have been amazing. Vampires with different superpowers? Vampire royalty? Giant Werewolves? Sounds like a comic book to me. I think all of that would have worked better as an action novel than a quasi romance novel. Fifty Shade of Grey is just plan softcore porn, if you ask me.
I only read the first Twilight, but it seemed to me to be nothing worse than a lot of teenage fiction - pretty badly written, but not
that bad. It struck me as having the same issue as the Hunger Games did; the bullshit romantic plot that supercedes anything interesting that might be happening.
Honestly, if you had Twilight without Edward and Bella, it would be a hell of a lot more interesting. Barely restrained killing machines trying to pass in ordinary society, roving packs of vampires praying on whoever they want, supernatural vampire vs werewolf warfare...pretty cool. Instead we just got a lot of teenage angst.
One thing I do question, though. You know how one of the not-Edward Cullens absolutely flips his shit because Bella cuts herself and he can smell that tiny drop of blood from the other side of the room? How it drives him into a mindless berserker rage? Well, he goes to a high school with hundreds or possibly thousands of teenage girls.
Do none of them ever menstruate?! You'd think by now that school would be a wasteland littered with corpses just because one girl was on the rag and someone caught a whiff.