U.S. bans flavored cigarettes

Recommended Videos

Ninja_X

New member
Aug 9, 2009
616
0
0
Housebroken Lunatic said:
Ninja_X said:
The facts are in favor of me living longer(statistically), so I get to laugh at your grave.
Considering the fact that Ozzy Osbourne AND Keith Richards are still alive, but guys like Jim Fixx dies of heartattacks way before their prime, pretty much disprove of your so called "facts".

Oh and then theres the fact that im not a habitual smoker myself, and then there's the fact that lung cancer isn't something people in my family are genetically predisposed to get, so I could actually smoke a lot more and still not die from it.

But I wouldn't expect a living, breathing proof would persuade you from your anti-intellectual ways, being the moron you are...
Two people? Ozzy Osbourne AND Keith Richards??? OHHH that changes everything!!!

You fail. Proof? What proof? All I see is you failing.

Look at the facts and statistics for once, you have not come up with ANY solid facts to support you argument and have been reduced to ranting and flaming.

People who smoke have much higher likelihood of getting cancer, emphysema, various other FATAL lung/heart/oral conditions on average. It increases your chance of getting lung cancer regardless of your family history. Are you so stupid to think that because you have little family history of lung cancer it makes you immune to carcinogens? Do you know what carcinogens even are?

Most smokers have shorter life-spans because of their habit. That is fact.

You deny that smoking kills because 2 celebrities who smoke just happen to live longer than people who got an unrelated medical condition?

Fail. Two exemptions do not prove that smoking doesn't kill you. It means they are two lucky people not to get some fatal illness yet.

Try coming up with evidence to refute me this time if you bother responding.
 

kawligia

New member
Feb 24, 2009
779
0
0
Clashero said:
I understand their reasoning, but disagree with it... somewhat. I'm for for there being fewer cigarettes going around, but just banning flavoured cigs is like saying "ALCOHOL BAN: YOU CAN NO LONGER DRINK ALMOND-FLAVOURED BOLS"
These things happen in stages. Now that flavored cigarettes are banned, menthol cigarettes will be next. Then unfiltered cigarettes are next, followed by non-lite cigarettes. And in the end, all of them will be banned and the nanny state will win.
 

Housebroken Lunatic

New member
Sep 12, 2009
2,544
0
0
Ninja_X said:
You fail. Proof? What proof? All I see is you failing.
No, what you see is me not going to any greater lengths in the quality of my arguments than you have done so far. You see, there's no reason what so ever to even try having a sensible debate with you. It would be a waste of time and effort trying to explain to you how it all comes together in this topic. mainly because you've not even bothered to read most of the responses I've written in this thread to other people.

You're not here to debate, you are here to condemn. Therefore any viable argument coming your way won't have any effect at all.

So hopefully you'll understand why im not particularly inclined to go to any greater lengths than you have done so far. And even if you don't understand... Well, I really couldn't care less. : )
 

Ghost

Spoony old Bard
Feb 13, 2009
893
0
0
I've never even seen flavoured cigarettes, it doesn't seem fair to ban them though, doesn't seem like they are any more dangerous than regular cigarettes, or any more addictive.
 

Ninja_X

New member
Aug 9, 2009
616
0
0
Housebroken Lunatic said:
Ninja_X said:
You fail. Proof? What proof? All I see is you failing.
No, what you see is me not going to any greater lengths in the quality of my arguments than you have done so far. You see, there's no reason what so ever to even try having a sensible debate with you. It would be a waste of time and effort trying to explain to you how it all comes together in this topic. mainly because you've not even bothered to read most of the responses I've written in this thread to other people.

You're not here to debate, you are here to condemn. Therefore any viable argument coming your way won't have any effect at all.

So hopefully you'll understand why im not particularly inclined to go to any greater lengths than you have done so far. And even if you don't understand... Well, I really couldn't care less. : )
You have stopped arguing you point because you can't continue.

You can't argue with the logic, statistics and actual facts in the post you quoted.

I'm right you are wrong. Get over it of prove me wrong

You cannot come up with justification for sucking cancer for a stupid drug high. Not once have you even tried.

If you don't wanna continue, then stop posting. I thought there was at least some chance of you salvaging an argument, but you have stopped debating facts and devolved into swelling your own head with self centered bullshit that in turn makes you a hypocrite.

Can't argue with me cause I've lost it? Can't argue with statistics and facts about smoking is closer to the mark.
 

JaredXE

New member
Apr 1, 2009
1,378
0
0
Yeah, because THAT'S what drives the children to smoke.....flavours.

Fucking government, seriously, THIS is the best they can do? What right do they claim to regulate specific NON-HARMFUL products (the flavour, NOT the tobacco)? It's things like this that really make me agree that we are heading into a fascist state where the government can control everything we do, down to regulating THE FLAVOURS we can enjoy.


Kids don't smoke because it tastes like cherries. Cigarettes taste like ass. No they smoke for the belief it's cool, it's forbidden, and to relieve some stress due to the shit they have to put up with regarding school and parents.
 

Housebroken Lunatic

New member
Sep 12, 2009
2,544
0
0
Ninja_X said:
You have stopped arguing you point because you can't continue.

You can't argue with the logic, statistics and actual facts in the post you quoted.

I'm right you are wrong. Get over it of prove me wrong

You cannot come up with justification for sucking cancer for a stupid drug high. Not once have you even tried.

If you don't wanna continue, then stop posting. I thought there was at least some chance of you salvaging an argument, but you have stopped debating facts and devolved into swelling your own head with self centered bullshit that in turn makes you a hypocrite.

Can't argue with me cause I've lost it? Can't argue with statistics and facts about smoking is closer to the mark.
I've argued against the stuff you call "facts" for years, and I've beaten them to a pulp several times over. Trying to explain it to you would entail repeating myself for the umph-teenth time and im getting quite bored. Especially since my arguments have been well documented, even in this thread and quite a few other threads on this messageboard.

Frankly, you don't strike me as a very important person to try to persuade, and the best part is that you're obviously aware of that too. Which makes you angry, and that's why you continue your banter.

Man up and get over it. You are simply not special enough to make me want to repeat myself yet again.

If you want to consider yourself the "winner" because of that, then consider this:

http://www.afunnystuff.com/forumpics/arguing.jpg

And just shut the fuck up...
 

JaredXE

New member
Apr 1, 2009
1,378
0
0
Ninja_X said:
The facts are in favor of me living longer(statistically), so I get to laugh at your grave.

There is living and there is living. As Dennis Leary once said, "Sammy Davis Junior died at age 64. Give me 64 Sammy years, I'd rather take it than a 107 Ken Starr years."

Yeah, statistically you may not be getting lung cancer or other problems due to smoking. Or you may get hit by a bus. Don't feel so damn morally superior over your health choices. If smokers like smoking, then they like it and would not enjoy life without cigarettes. Besides, it is not certain that a smoker dies earlier. They have higher risk, sure, there is no disputing that.....but risk does not equal certainty. My great-grandfather died in his 80's and he smoked since he was 10. He also built ships during WWII and inhaled tons of asbestos.....still lived to a ripe old age. Lung cancer does not always lead to death.
 

Ninja_X

New member
Aug 9, 2009
616
0
0
Housebroken Lunatic said:
Ninja_X said:
You have stopped arguing you point because you can't continue.

You can't argue with the logic, statistics and actual facts in the post you quoted.

I'm right you are wrong. Get over it of prove me wrong

You cannot come up with justification for sucking cancer for a stupid drug high. Not once have you even tried.

If you don't wanna continue, then stop posting. I thought there was at least some chance of you salvaging an argument, but you have stopped debating facts and devolved into swelling your own head with self centered bullshit that in turn makes you a hypocrite.

Can't argue with me cause I've lost it? Can't argue with statistics and facts about smoking is closer to the mark.
I've argued against the stuff you call "facts" for years, and I've beaten them to a pulp several times over. Trying to explain it to you would entail repeating myself for the umph-teenth time and im getting quite bored. Especially since my arguments have been well documented, even in this thread and quite a few other threads on this messageboard.

Frankly, you don't strike me as a very important person to try to persuade, and the best part is that you're obviously aware of that too. Which makes you angry, and that's why you continue your banter.

Man up and get over it. You are simply not special enough to make me want to repeat myself yet again.

If you want to consider yourself the "winner" because of that, then consider this:

http://www.afunnystuff.com/forumpics/arguing.jpg

And just shut the fuck up...
Nope, I think you are blowing hot air.

You have no argument, at all.

You just continue to fail to prove any point here, hiding behind this facade of "facts" that you haven't brought up, and this smug sense of superiority because you refuse to come up with a decent argument because you are tired? That just a cop out.

If you can't prove me wrong you just admit you have nothing to say. No argument. Nothing but bigotry and hot air.
 

Housebroken Lunatic

New member
Sep 12, 2009
2,544
0
0
Ninja_X said:
Nope, I think you are blowing hot air.

You have no argument, at all.

You just continue to fail to prove any point here, hiding behind this facade of "facts" that you haven't brought up, and this smug sense of superiority because you refuse to come up with a decent argument because you are tired? That just a cop out.

If you can't prove me wrong you just admit you have nothing to say. No argument. Nothing but bigotry and hot air.
"BIGOTRY!?"

And this comes from the man/woman/thing that should not be, who is all for condemnation! AHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!! :D

I hope you enjoyed the show folks. It's called "Ninja_X - making an ass of himself", and I know most of you will laugh at him/her/it and I can certainly sympathize. But somewhere out there, a real person actually sits behind his/her/it's keyboard and is trying to change the world for the worse through condemnation and hypocrisy for all of us, and that's not very funny at all. : (

Or, he's simply just another troll. Im gonna go with Occhams razor on this one and assume he is, I just feel way too dirty and embarassed right now for ever having associated myself with this thing called Ninja_X...
 

Housebroken Lunatic

New member
Sep 12, 2009
2,544
0
0
JaredXE said:
Ninja_X said:
The facts are in favor of me living longer(statistically), so I get to laugh at your grave.

There is living and there is living. As Dennis Leary once said, "Sammy Davis Junior died at age 64. Give me 64 Sammy years, I'd rather take it than a 107 Ken Starr years."

Yeah, statistically you may not be getting lung cancer or other problems due to smoking. Or you may get hit by a bus. Don't feel so damn morally superior over your health choices. If smokers like smoking, then they like it and would not enjoy life without cigarettes. Besides, it is not certain that a smoker dies earlier. They have higher risk, sure, there is no disputing that.....but risk does not equal certainty. My great-grandfather died in his 80's and he smoked since he was 10. He also built ships during WWII and inhaled tons of asbestos.....still lived to a ripe old age. Lung cancer does not always lead to death.
Please, don't even try speaking sense to this obvious troll, it won't work.

And also be sure to check up on Bill Hicks on youtube. Denis Leary stole*COUGH!*... I meant "took inspiration from" quite a lot from his act.

So if you're not familiar with Hicks at all, but like Denis Leary, then it will probably be right up your alley. : )
 

cobra_ky

New member
Nov 20, 2008
1,643
0
0
Ninja_X said:
snip
Housebroken Lunatic said:
what in the fuck are you people doing to my thread?

Look. every time you smoke, you're increasing your risk of cancer. you do the same thing every time you drink alcohol or get a tan. People do all sorts of stupid and unhealthy things because they feel good, and if i'm not close to them i don't give a rat's ass. what i DO give a rat's ass about is when people do things that are stupid and unhealthy for the people around them. i don't care what people smoke, as long as they don't make other people breathe it in.

if either of you have anything constructive to say on the topic at hand, please do so. otherwise kindly take your bullshit pissing contest to private messages.
 

jpoon

New member
Mar 26, 2009
1,995
0
0
I don't even smoke but I say this is total bullshit. It will stop not a damn person from smoking. What a waste of time and money. This government is fucking worthless...

RIP THE SYSTEM!