U.S. Military Bans Medal of Honor From On-Base Stores

Recommended Videos

Del-Toro

New member
Aug 6, 2008
1,154
0
0
Ironic Pirate said:
The Procrastinated End said:
Maybe the governments don't want people seeing the war through the enemies' eyes, because you know that might make them seem human and less like malevolent tan people.
But, you don't see it through their eyes. It's multiplayer, it's literally the same thing, but with AK-47s instead of M16s. I don't think that would make anyone more sympathetic.
It's not as if online multiplayer is anything like real war. As far as I know real soldiers don't run around like chickens with their heads cut off screaming with 12 year old voices about noob-tubers and their own inability to get enough kills for a nuke because the other side is being faggots and using the UMP and Harrier. That goes especially for insurgents. Also, there aren't spawn points out there.
 

Housebroken Lunatic

New member
Sep 12, 2009
2,544
0
0
If these retailers sold other FPS titles with military themes in the past, then they are all fucking hypocrites to refuse to sell this particular title due to such weak reasons...
 

robert022614

meeeoooow
Dec 1, 2009
369
0
0
As a former 11 bravo and iraq veteran I dont see the big deal here. We are big boys and girls who can choose what we can and cant handle. Its not like there never was a generic "taliban" type of character available in recent games. Calling terrorists by other names from other psudo middle eastern countries is the same thing. Get over it people if it offends you dont buy it its simple logic.
 

laserwulf

New member
Dec 30, 2007
223
0
0
The general ineptitude of AAFES is no surprise to us soldiers and vets, but this is just silly. Whoever wants the game will get it regardless, but it says to me that AAFES doesn't think we're able to make mature decisions on our own. It inconveniences the solders, especially those down-range who can only buy games at the PX or through amazon.com. I'd say "boycott AAFES", but they are literally the only game in town on base, and boycotting the PX is easy; their selection and prices for games are terrible.
 

Blue_vision

Elite Member
Mar 31, 2009
1,276
0
41
Romidude said:
Oh no we can't play as brown people that would just be horrible to kill a few Americans(Models textured to look American), sure we have invaded numerous countries killing thousands upon thousands of people just trying to live their lives and now we can play as the people who opposed that? That's just horrible!
This pretty much sums up my opinion.

And it's funny, because if they proposed banning the game in Iran or something (for mercilessly gunning down muslim stereotypes,) then westerners would cry that the country's being oppressive and backwards.
 

laserwulf

New member
Dec 30, 2007
223
0
0
SilentHunter7 said:
Nimbus said:
Are you telling me that there are Gamestop stores on Military bases? The fuck?
There's a lot of things on bases. I remember eating at a Subway on Wright-Patterson AFB.
Due to AAFES contracts, there are Burger King and Popeye's restaurants on bases, but you'll never see a McDonald's.
 

x434343

New member
Mar 22, 2008
1,276
0
0
Nimbus said:
Are you telling me that there are Gamestop stores on Military bases? The fuck?
Post Exchange store. The PX gets to choose what they stock.
 

Ironic Pirate

New member
May 21, 2009
5,544
0
0
Del-Toro said:
Ironic Pirate said:
The Procrastinated End said:
Maybe the governments don't want people seeing the war through the enemies' eyes, because you know that might make them seem human and less like malevolent tan people.
But, you don't see it through their eyes. It's multiplayer, it's literally the same thing, but with AK-47s instead of M16s. I don't think that would make anyone more sympathetic.
It's not as if online multiplayer is anything like real war. As far as I know real soldiers don't run around like chickens with their heads cut off screaming with 12 year old voices about noob-tubers and their own inability to get enough kills for a nuke because the other side is being faggots and using the UMP and Harrier. That goes especially for insurgents. Also, there aren't spawn points out there.
I know, that's what I was trying to tell the other guy. It's hard to feel sympathetic for a group of people if your experience of them is a game, and all your team mates are singing terrible songs or screaming at each other about how a certain gun is overpowered.
 

Arehexes

New member
Jun 27, 2008
1,141
0
0
Hi there, Arehexes here don't know if this was posted or not yet but here.

http://store.steampowered.com/app/13140/

Oh and fyi recruiters from the army came by the jrotc dept of my high school gave those games out to get people to join.
 

Daverson

New member
Nov 17, 2009
1,164
0
0
Eukaryote said:
Boohoo, we already play as Nazis in other games.
The Taliban aren't the "Wehrmacht" of this war. They aren't just defending their country from invaders, like the Hans, Fritz or Johan you might find in most WW2 games. They're the "SS" of this war, they're a group with clear objectives.

There are countless Militia groups in Afghanistan, the "bad guys" could easily have been just another insurgent group that Coalition forces engage almost daily, or the "Wehrmacht" of this war, that I was getting at.

The Taliban are an organization that, to be frank, pretty much embodies everything the Coalition is trying to prevent in the middle east. I could give you endless examples, but I'd suggest you look them up on wikipedia, here's some choice quotes though:
Wikipedia said:
Under the Taliban regime, Sharia law was interpreted to forbid a wide variety of previously lawful activities in Afghanistan. One Taliban list of prohibitions included pork, pig, pig oil, anything made from human hair, satellite dishes, cinematography, and equipment that produces the joy of music, pool tables, chess, masks, alcohol, tapes, computers, VCRs, television, anything that propagates sex and is full of music, wine, lobster, nail polish, firecrackers, statues, sewing catalogs [sic], pictures, Christmas cards.

They also prohibited employment, education and sports for women, dancing, clapping during sports events, kite flying, and depictions of living things, whether drawings, paintings, photographs, stuffed animals, or dolls. Men were required to have a beard longer than a fist placed at the base of the chin. Conversely, they had to wear their head hair short. Men were also required to wear a head covering.

Punishment was severe. Theft was punished by the amputation of a hand, rape and murder by public execution, and married adulterers were stoned to death. In Kabul, punishments including executions were carried out in front of crowds in the city's soccer stadium. Rules were issued by the Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and Suppression of Vice (PVSV) and enforced by its "religious police", importing that Wahhabi concept.

Like Wahhabi and other Deobandis, the Taliban do not consider Shiʻi to be Muslims. The Taliban also declared the Hazara ethnic group, which totaled [sic] almost 10% of Afghanistan's population, "not Muslims."

Employment for women was restricted to the medical sector, because male medical personnel were not allowed to examine them. One result of the banning of employment of women by the Taliban was the closing down in places like Kabul of primary schools not only for girls but for boys, because almost all the teachers there were women. Women were made to wear the burqa, a traditional dress covering the entire body except for a small screen to see out of. Taliban restrictions became more severe after they took control of the capital. In February 1998, religious police forced all women off the streets of Kabul and issued new regulations ordering people to blacken their windows, so that women would not be visible from the outside.
Though, if I can be frank, I think calling the bad guys "Taliban" is an act of ignorance at the state of affairs in the region. I doubt anyone at EA even know today the difference between the Taliban and al-Qaeda. It would not surprise me in the slightest if they actually believe that all the bad guys in the middle east are just "Talibans".
 

Vault boy Eddie

New member
Feb 18, 2009
1,800
0
0
Soldiers have the most wicked, morbid sense of humor, you think these guys are gonna get all baww cause the game has Insurgents and whatnot? CHILD PLEASE!
 

ElephantGuts

New member
Jul 9, 2008
3,520
0
0
I find it interesting how Gamestop specifies its reasons for not carrying the game as "out of respect for our past and present men and women in uniform."

If Gamestop apparently does not wish to carry games that allow players to play as both "past and present" enemies of the US military, why is Medal of Honor any different from the dozens and dozens of games that allow players to play as German or Japanese soldiers in World War 2? Perhaps Gamestop forgets that thousands of US military personnel fought and died in the second World War; that seems a lot more disrespectful than allowing current military personnel to purchase Medal of Honor on the bases they serve on.
 

lijenstina

New member
Jun 18, 2008
119
0
0
Real respect for soldiers is not sending them in useless wars without a clear goal and strategy.
What Video games to be played or not should come last on the what to do list, after the question of what color of toilet paper is more effective for boosting morale.
 

duchaked

New member
Dec 25, 2008
4,451
0
0
well the game is banned from the Army GameStop stores, but it doesn't mean U.S. soldiers are prohibited from buying it elsewhere/regular GameStops and owning/playing it
overall, it's quite understandable
 

lijenstina

New member
Jun 18, 2008
119
0
0
Generic Gamer said:
Or think about if people decide the game is a 100% accurate portrayal of the conflict and take it out on soldiers freshly discharged? And yes people that moronic exist.

Obviously it should still be released but not on a base and not to soldiers who do that shit for real.
Is there any part of human existence that isn't, at some point, misused by morons ? That argument is invalid.