Ubisoft: No New IPs Without a New Console Generation

Recommended Videos

Daemascus

WAAAAAAAAAGHHH!!!!
Mar 6, 2010
792
0
0
Sigh... Ubisoft is being stupid again...
O well as long as HAWX 2 comes out on time I really dont care.
 

suhlEap

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,044
0
0
it's not time for a new console generation, because it's too bloody expensive.
 

Tanis

The Last Albino
Aug 30, 2010
5,264
0
0
Ubisoft...only one of (not even a) handful of companies I won't buy games from unless they're used.

Don't really care what they have to say anymore.
BG&E is the only thing I care about them making.
 

BryanS7

New member
Dec 25, 2008
3
0
0
TPiddy said:
MS won't let it go on that long. It's not going to run 6 more years on its current platform given how far behind the system already is. In 2-3 years when more devs unlock the PS3's potential it'll look like an even better deal than it does now. MS will start to take an ass-kicking in sales. MS brings out a new console by 2014. Mark my words.
Is the 360 that much weaker than the PS3 though? Blu-Ray is an advantage without a doubt, but from a gameplay and graphics standpoint, it's not a large difference. As you said though, when devs get more skilled with the machine we could see that difference increase.

I don't really see either Sony or MS wanting to push towards new consoles for a long while. The 360 in particular has been out a year longer, so typically we'd start hearing about the next console around this time. Instead of the next generation though, both are trotting out high-priced accessories to their core consoles with Kinect and Move. It's a smart move, since you're still selling your older console, and at a profit.

Nintendo I think is the wild card, since a lot of people expect some sort of Wii HD in the near future. They could trump both by bringing out a Wii2 that's more powerful than both the PS3 and 360 with a full library of guaranteed Nintendo first-party hits. Guess time will tell.
 

TPiddy

New member
Aug 28, 2009
2,359
0
0
BryanS7 said:
Is the 360 that much weaker than the PS3 though? Blu-Ray is an advantage without a doubt, but from a gameplay and graphics standpoint, it's not a large difference. As you said though, when devs get more skilled with the machine we could see that difference increase.

I don't really see either Sony or MS wanting to push towards new consoles for a long while. The 360 in particular has been out a year longer, so typically we'd start hearing about the next console around this time. Instead of the next generation though, both are trotting out high-priced accessories to their core consoles with Kinect and Move. It's a smart move, since you're still selling your older console, and at a profit.

Nintendo I think is the wild card, since a lot of people expect some sort of Wii HD in the near future. They could trump both by bringing out a Wii2 that's more powerful than both the PS3 and 360 with a full library of guaranteed Nintendo first-party hits. Guess time will tell.
Well, the PS3's game library has pretty much caught up to the 360's, and both sides are losing exclusive title priviledges at an alarming rate, with 360 getting Final Fantasy and Metal Gear, and now with PS3 getting Mass Effect.

I do think you have a good point about the Wii, but it's just my gut feeling that somebody's going to jump the gun on the new console generation to get a headstart like MS got.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
So what, does this mean they're scrapping "I Am Alive"?

That would make me very sad.
Ah well, probably wouldn't buy it anyway if it used their absolutely stupid DRM.
 

Yvl9921

Our Sweet Prince
Apr 4, 2009
347
0
0
I don't understand Ubisoft's obsession with pushing the next console generation, cuz this is not the first time they've brought up the next generation with a hopeful look in their eyes. This one is expensive enough as is, do they not understand that a new generation would make that even worse?
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,073
0
0
well i dont see that happening anytime, especiall with sony, who wanted to draw it out a good chunk of years to really recover in profits.

i dont see many people moving on to the "new" consoles if they did have another new generation, so the companies would fail and i think they realize that so thats why they are biding there time with the next generation hopefully.
 

obliviondoll

New member
May 27, 2010
251
0
0
I'm inclined to think that should be "We're not bringing out any MORE new IPs than the ones we've already announced." There's a nice collection of new IPs in the works from Ubisoft already.

And as for the DRM, I'm glad I'm a PS3 gamer...

As for the next console generation, it's a couple of years away at the very least.

And I also say Nintendo are the ones most likely to pull the early release card on the other two.

Also worth noting, Sony don't say 10 year lifespan for their consoles, they say 20 - they expect people to still be gaming on last-gen consoles for a long time after the new one is released. Supported by a very slow decline in PS2 game releases after the PS3 came out.
 

Phoenixmgs_v1legacy

Muse of Fate
Sep 1, 2010
4,691
0
0
Well looks like I probably won't be buying any Ubisoft games except for Beyond Good & Evil 2. And, Ubisoft, Assassins Creed was a new IP this gen, not a very good IP but it's made you money.

The 3 games I'm looking forward to most this year are all new IPs: Vanquish (the demo was great), Majin and the Forsaken Kingdom, and Enslaved.
 

Delusibeta

Reachin' out...
Mar 7, 2010
2,594
0
0
ShootMania. There you go, confirmation that he's talking out of his arse. Even though it'll probably be riddled with UbiDRM (remember, RUSE is the exception: HAWX2 will get UbiDRM'd).
 

TPiddy

New member
Aug 28, 2009
2,359
0
0
gmaverick019 said:
well i dont see that happening anytime, especiall with sony, who wanted to draw it out a good chunk of years to really recover in profits.

i dont see many people moving on to the "new" consoles if they did have another new generation, so the companies would fail and i think they realize that so thats why they are biding there time with the next generation hopefully.
Yeah, Sony wants to keep this generation going for longer because the longer it goes the better suited they are for it. The competition, however, won't let that happen and they will force Sony's hand.
 
Jun 11, 2008
5,331
0
0
thethingthatlurks said:
Apologies to those who are not fluent in German [http://www.gamestar.de/news/branche/2317506/ubisoft.html]
The article basically says that Ubisoft is not willing to risk the development of new triple A IPs on the current console generation, as that apparently poses too much of a financial risk. Given the mindblowing success of CoD6:MW2, I can certainly understand that. Essentially, we'll have Ass-Creed XXX before some amazing completely new game.
So for discussion, is it time for a new console generation? And if not, why not?
MW2 is not CoD 6 it is not part of the main series and is a spin off game from one of better games in the series CoD4. It is important it is not thrown in with the main series especially since it was not originally marketed with CoD in the title.

OT: I think is more of a pussy move on Ubisoft's account. I understand that the economy isn't great at the moment but that is why you must innovate and make new IPs. The companies are hardly going to plop out a new console gen anytime soon so unless Ubisoft changes their attitude they may face declining profits. So bacially given that the current global economic climate is shit and that some companies particularly Sony are only starting to turn a profit on their consoles I don't see a new gen coming anytime soon.
 

AlphaOmega

New member
Oct 10, 2008
1,732
0
0
With their piece of shit drm I refuse to buy any game of theirs anyway.
Yes even beyond good and evil 2.