UK pedo caught by DSi. Confesses to sex (multiple times) with girl (9-11), Gets 3.5 years. Wat.

Recommended Videos

Ieyke

New member
Jul 24, 2008
1,402
0
0
FelixG said:
Vegosiux said:
It's fun how this kind of thread turns people into bloodthirsty vigilantes. Murdering someone because "he deserves it" is still murder (and in some parts of the world, even "civilized" world, people "deserve it" for disturbing reasons). On the other hand, unless you're perfectly willing to torture someone to death yourself, don't wish that fate upon them (though if you are perfectly willing to do that, tell me where you live so I can move to the opposite side of the globe).
I would be just fine with torturing someone myself, though just flat out killing them would be far less of a hassle!

I live on the west coast of the US, so, plan your future residence accordingly!
I was gonna say, murder is always listed under "getting off easy" in my book.
Simply killing people would be my method of removing people who embody a certain level of danger to me or someone I care about.
Simple.
Easy.
Quick.
I place very little value on the lives of humans who I don't know, and ending them wouldn't especially bother me beyond dealing with the literal and legal mess involved.

Now, someone I hate for some unforgivable atrocity, something that deserves real punishment, something that evokes real disgust....they don't get to die. They get to suffer and live out a long and miserable existence after I'm through with them.

I live in Texas, so feel free to move to the Indian Ocean, or Australia, or whatever.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
MammothBlade said:
Woodsey said:
MammothBlade said:
Woodsey said:
MammothBlade said:
Woodsey said:
MammothBlade said:
Woodsey said:
MammothBlade said:
Woodsey said:
Esotera said:
Apparently no-one here has the ability to read secondary sources, because they alone have said that the abuser has borderline learning disabilities, and is getting a whole lot of treatment that goes far beyond 3.5 years.

You don't need to go to jail for hundreds of years to have effective punishment/rehabilitation.
Please, you don't expect people to read, do you? I guess we're lucky people like this fellow aren't the ones making up the rules:

MammothBlade said:
Bloody Hell, this is a complete f**king travesty of justice. He needs to be castrated, painfully.
And we should cut off thieves' hands too, am I right? You know, like a civilised society. Overblown, emotional responses help precisely no one.

Children are taught to react to situations and issues (relative to their age, obviously) better than you just have.

Haha, no. It's a completely different crime. I support forced labour for thieves. They will put their hands to socially beneficial use.

Male sex offenders should be castrated as their corrupted sexuality is the source of their crimes, and their manhood is offensive to their victims.

Rather, provided you're a nice person you're unlucky you don't have people such as I making up the rules, violent criminals and sex offenders would be an endangered species. :D
And what if they're wrongly convicted? Or does your made up, psychopathic justice system also lay claim to a 100% correct conviction rate?
There would be an evidence threshold. In this case, there is more than enough evidence to secure a definite conviction. With less sturdy convictions, reversible chemical castration could be considered. Nothing psychopathic about it.
A leaning towards remorseless violence and bodily harm. That's psychopathic.
No it's not. It is proportionate to the severity of the crime and the potential suffering of the victim. It takes into account that it is unfair to punish someone beyond the extent of their crimes.
Yes, it is. Include your addendum if you wish, it doesn't change the nature of the punishment.

All you're doing is exhibiting a degree of inhumanity and cruelty for which you'd just as quickly denounce someone else for. An advanced society fixes its problems, it doesn't focus on infantile revenge tactics which only serve to exasperate the problem further.
No, it isn't. It only becomes "inhumane" or cruel when it exceeds the boundaries of proportionality. Offenders need to learn a fundamental lesson of human justice. Do not commit acts of evil unless you are prepared to pay the full consequences. I do believe in mercy, and those who are truly sorry can be shown clemency. However, remorseless criminals deserve the full punishment.
Your punishments offer no compassion, whilst inflicting great amounts of pain and distress. They are the definition of cruel and inhumane, 'proportionality' is irrelevant, because you're not even proportional, you're childishly vengeful. All you have done so far is show you lack compassion (even by way of simply abstaining from humiliating people), and possess an interest only in satisfying the vengeful wants of victims and yourself.

You are so obsessed with the idea of 'getting your own back' that you pay no consideration to the fact that you would hopefully be releasing most people back into society. Degrading and disaffecting people in the ways you think are so brilliant, so wonderfully fair and just, will make them more socially maligned.

Society has improved the more your short-sighted, infantile, so-called "justice" has eroded.
Punishments aren't supposed to be compassionate. The pain and distress is a part of the punishment which the offender has to face. Once they've done so, then we can talk about compassion and rehabilitation.

Hah, you have the gall to use "childish" or "infantile" as a term of disdain, when children are the very victims of such crimes! I think that children are the most morally pure, bearing that in mind if anything maybe justice should be more childish.
"compassion (even by way of simply abstaining from humiliating people)"

As I said, you'd go out of your way to dehumanise people. Its counter-productive.

"you have the gall to use "childish" or "infantile" as a term of disdain, when children are the very victims of such crimes!"

You realise this is a non-point, right? Things being done to children doesn't mean you can behave like a child in how you react.
 

ph0b0s123

New member
Jul 7, 2010
1,689
0
0
SaneAmongInsane said:
ph0b0s123 said:
SaneAmongInsane said:
Don't fuck a kid. Don't have child pornography. DON'T have hentai, there are fleshlights, I really don't think those two rules are really that hard to avoid breaking.
Fixed for you as this case was in the UK. So any sexual depiction (even a stick drawing) of someone who gives the 'impression' of being under 18 or shows two adults being sexual in the presence of a minor, defined as above, is considered child porn now...
I mean... one could argue it falls under obscene, but that strikes me as a stupid thing to do.

Give 'em something to jerk to, so long as no one's being harmed. For fucks sakes, they're still human, they're still men sick in the head or not.

Can you really get caught with that though? I mean UK doesn't spy on or censore their internet right?
I don't know what mechanism you where you get caught with it. We do have bodies like the IWF who filter our internet for child porn and CEOP who try to track people distributing / downloading it. Oh yeah, in the UK downloading child porn is considered and charged as 'making' child porn because you made a new copy, of course that won't mislead the public at all.

Most commonly I assume is when the police knock down you door on an unrelated matter they always take any computers in the house. The law is clear, anything that gives the jury the 'impression' of being under 18 (actual wording of the law) is child porn and carries, I believe the same punishments as media of actual children. Don't forget the age of consent in the UK is 16, which already makes it dumb that it's under 18's. I also believe this law incentivises people to look at real abuse pictures, as why not, the punishment is the same....

Fortunately since the law came in two years ago it has mainly been used as an add-on against people who were found with real child porn. In which case I have happy they are being punished. I just don't get why you need the add-on if they have the real stuff, punish them for that. Seems a way just to add time to their sentence, maybe.
 

maddawg IAJI

I prefer the term "Zomguard"
Feb 12, 2009
7,840
0
0
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
BathorysGraveland said:
Isn't 9-11 a little old for it be actual paedophilia?
Its actually in the right age range for pedophilia. Pedophilia is the attraction to children who had not yet gone through puberty.
Seanfall said:
....What happened to the good old days when we use to Hang these mother fuckers?
We kinda grew the fuck up and stopped being barbarians and decided "Ya know, it probably would be a tad hypocritical to fucking hang people over a mental defect." :/
Again explain to me, and give me some cited example of how it is a mental Defect? Cause so far people saying it is doesn't make it so. And rather it is or isn't. Means jack. If it IS, which I don't think it is, that means that no amount of self control can or will fix him, meaning he needs to be separated or put down. This isn't some guy like Rain man or Forrest Gump this is a guy who raped and molested a kid. Big freaking difference.
As a medical diagnosis, pedophilia, or paedophilia, is defined as a psychiatric disorder... [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#cite_note-dsm4-0]

If you don't like Wikipedia, may I suggest Encylopedia Britannica, which says the exact same thing in the very first line. I don't know who you're talking to, but they're wrong. It is a disorder of the brain.

And again, no! They can not be killed or lose their right to liberty without due process. Its a basic fundamental right that all men and woman have. Even then, just because he suffers from said disorder, its no reason to send him off to a deserted island. There are several people who have been diagnosed with Pedophilia that don't act on the urges, including several celebrities.

Its honestly bad enough that you push for the fucking death sentence, now you wanna deny people civil liabilities?
I know people life with pedophilic urges and don't act on them. BUT HE DID! And Yes I think Pedophiles should get the Death Sentence.
I stopped reading right here. I don't give a fuck what you have to say anymore. I'm not arguing with someone who thinks that a man who actually got a harsher sentence then the national average for his crime should be put the death. You have no grasp of what the purpose of law and punishment is if you think the death sentence is a reasonable punishment.
News Flash: The Death Sentence is used in a lot of states. It's legal. We just need to broaden who can be given it.
News Flash: This happened in the UK, where the death sentence is illegal. Even then, it doesn't even fucking matter because the death sentence doesn't fucking work. It doesn't rehabilitate the detained (How can you when they're dead?) and it doesn't intimidate (States with the death sentence actually have far higher crime rates then most who don't.) Even then, the supreme court ruled you can't give the death sentence for those guilty of rape, which is what this is! Statutory Rape!

Look up Kennedy v. Louisiana and see for yourself.
Never said I cared about Rehabilitation. And again I said it should be expanded on.
Well too fucking bad, because without rehabilitation, we'd be up to our motherfucking eye balls in prisoners. And again, too fucking bad, its already been ruled as unconstitutional by the supreme court of the US. To expand it, you'd either have to become president and replace at least 5 members of the supreme court or you'd have to get rid of the constitution, both of which aren't reasonable options. And even then, you couldn't do anything to this man because he is in the UK.

Just face it dude, you have an unreasonable sense of justice and seem harbor far too much of a grudge for a man who got the right punishment for his crime.
As far as I know The Death Peantly is still legal in several states. And no I don't harbor a grudge. And I don't think he got the right punishment. I will not 'just face it' cause these are my personal beliefs. I won't face it anymore then you will about your beliefs. And calling it statutory Rape is an understatement. I've known people who have this done them. One of my girlfreinds had something similar done to her, we were together for 3 years before she told me. And it still hurt her, so forgive me if I don't an ounce of mercy in me for these people.
Ya, most states do use the death penalty. About 30/50, but that number gets lower and lower with every passing decade. Heck, just last year, we had 14 states repeal their death penalty laws. There are even some states out there that haven't killed anyone on the death penalty since 1976. The only few places where the death penalty is used as a punishment heavily, is in the deep south.

I'm not asking you to have mercy for child molesters. I'm asking you to put your damn personal emotions aside and look at this from a logical standpoint, which you should be doing since thats what law and punishment are. Emotionless, logical and unbias. You're suggesting we give him a punishment that is reserved mainly for those who take life of someone else, and even then, most states won't even think about the death penalty unless you are guilty of multiple homicides.

I don't care what happened to your girlfriend. Its sad, ya I understand, but that doesn't mean I'm gonna give this man (If he was in the U.S., but he's in the UK and you're still pushing for the death penalty.)anymore jail time then his crime requires as punishment. Anything more is a violation of his 8th constitutional right. And according to the numbers, this is the average jail time for that crime. He got his fitting punishment.
 

Comando96

New member
May 26, 2009
637
0
0
Seanfall said:
You assuming those who posted that give a crap about the abuser. I for one don't. I don't care about 'rehabilitation' I don't care if he was handicapped. I don't care if he gets shanked in prison. I don't care about him period. And as for pedophilia being 'fixed' Where's your source on that? Cause as far as I know there's no cure or fix. I know people who live their life's fighting the urges and don't give in but I have am not now nor was I ever aware of a 'cure' for this. The only cure is a bullet to the head.
I genuinely dislike people like you more than the average paedophile... I mean... who would I rather the world lost... hmm... that's a hard one.

It's a condition of the brain and the person has ending up doing what he did because he was built by other factors to do what he did.

Read here:
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/for...defend-the-claim-that-Nazism-is-evil#14175076
For a look into the concept of evil.

Then we have people like you who say "I don't care. This guy is bad. Kill the guy so he is no longer a burden". Which is the same argument for killing everyone in wheelchairs.
Got your legs blown off in a war? Go have a "shower"...
You were born like this? Go have a "shower"...

You're in effect arguing for a form of eugenics... well you haven't said that but your argument is that same as the eugenics argument in a very similar way.

Is there a "cure". No.
There is no "cure" for things such as clinical depression... there never will be without tampering with the construct of the brain. However we have drugs and we have psychologists to help the individual understand themselves and coping methods to deal with depression. This exists in its infant stages for sex offenders.


Loius Theroux. Brilliant guy and Journalist documentary maker who tries to help people see things through the perspective of the people in question.

-------------

There will be those who do it knowingly that it is harmful and enjoy the fact it is harming people... those I wouldn't categorized in the same bracket as those who are just confused and weak-willed.

...and if you think that your think therefore you are, and your conscious then... you don't know the brain. You really have to think very very hard to become fully aware beyond the base instincts and reactions impressed upon you by society... you have to question your every thought to see what provoked that response. What was the cause of that thought?

Considering that there is an irony that with this knowlage that I dislike people as such who simply don't think about this as I know why they wouldn't think about stuf like this... but you've been enlightened now... right? Therefore if you have my opinion would change as you've responded to this... Or are you sticking to your simple black and white view of the world and humans being good or evil >.>
 

Zingtea

New member
Feb 17, 2010
22
0
0
MammothBlade said:
No-one is going to get irreversibly castrated if the evidence doesn't prove their undisputable guilt.
Just how the hell would you "reverse" castration? No-one I know of has been able to clone a new set of testicles.
 

MammothBlade

It's not that I LIKE you b-baka!
Oct 12, 2011
5,246
0
0
Zingtea said:
MammothBlade said:
No-one is going to get irreversibly castrated if the evidence doesn't prove their undisputable guilt.
Just how the hell would you "reverse" castration? No-one I know of has been able to clone a new set of testicles.
Chemical castration is reversible.
 

Seanfall

New member
May 3, 2011
460
0
0
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
BathorysGraveland said:
Isn't 9-11 a little old for it be actual paedophilia?
Its actually in the right age range for pedophilia. Pedophilia is the attraction to children who had not yet gone through puberty.
Seanfall said:
....What happened to the good old days when we use to Hang these mother fuckers?
We kinda grew the fuck up and stopped being barbarians and decided "Ya know, it probably would be a tad hypocritical to fucking hang people over a mental defect." :/
Again explain to me, and give me some cited example of how it is a mental Defect? Cause so far people saying it is doesn't make it so. And rather it is or isn't. Means jack. If it IS, which I don't think it is, that means that no amount of self control can or will fix him, meaning he needs to be separated or put down. This isn't some guy like Rain man or Forrest Gump this is a guy who raped and molested a kid. Big freaking difference.
As a medical diagnosis, pedophilia, or paedophilia, is defined as a psychiatric disorder... [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#cite_note-dsm4-0]

If you don't like Wikipedia, may I suggest Encylopedia Britannica, which says the exact same thing in the very first line. I don't know who you're talking to, but they're wrong. It is a disorder of the brain.

And again, no! They can not be killed or lose their right to liberty without due process. Its a basic fundamental right that all men and woman have. Even then, just because he suffers from said disorder, its no reason to send him off to a deserted island. There are several people who have been diagnosed with Pedophilia that don't act on the urges, including several celebrities.

Its honestly bad enough that you push for the fucking death sentence, now you wanna deny people civil liabilities?
I know people life with pedophilic urges and don't act on them. BUT HE DID! And Yes I think Pedophiles should get the Death Sentence.
I stopped reading right here. I don't give a fuck what you have to say anymore. I'm not arguing with someone who thinks that a man who actually got a harsher sentence then the national average for his crime should be put the death. You have no grasp of what the purpose of law and punishment is if you think the death sentence is a reasonable punishment.
News Flash: The Death Sentence is used in a lot of states. It's legal. We just need to broaden who can be given it.
News Flash: This happened in the UK, where the death sentence is illegal. Even then, it doesn't even fucking matter because the death sentence doesn't fucking work. It doesn't rehabilitate the detained (How can you when they're dead?) and it doesn't intimidate (States with the death sentence actually have far higher crime rates then most who don't.) Even then, the supreme court ruled you can't give the death sentence for those guilty of rape, which is what this is! Statutory Rape!

Look up Kennedy v. Louisiana and see for yourself.
Never said I cared about Rehabilitation. And again I said it should be expanded on.
Well too fucking bad, because without rehabilitation, we'd be up to our motherfucking eye balls in prisoners. And again, too fucking bad, its already been ruled as unconstitutional by the supreme court of the US. To expand it, you'd either have to become president and replace at least 5 members of the supreme court or you'd have to get rid of the constitution, both of which aren't reasonable options. And even then, you couldn't do anything to this man because he is in the UK.

Just face it dude, you have an unreasonable sense of justice and seem harbor far too much of a grudge for a man who got the right punishment for his crime.
As far as I know The Death Peantly is still legal in several states. And no I don't harbor a grudge. And I don't think he got the right punishment. I will not 'just face it' cause these are my personal beliefs. I won't face it anymore then you will about your beliefs. And calling it statutory Rape is an understatement. I've known people who have this done them. One of my girlfreinds had something similar done to her, we were together for 3 years before she told me. And it still hurt her, so forgive me if I don't an ounce of mercy in me for these people.
Ya, most states do use the death penalty. About 30/50, but that number gets lower and lower with every passing decade. Heck, just last year, we had 14 states repeal their death penalty laws. There are even some states out there that haven't killed anyone on the death penalty since 1976. The only few places where the death penalty is used as a punishment heavily, is in the deep south.

I'm not asking you to have mercy for child molesters. I'm asking you to put your damn personal emotions aside and look at this from a logical standpoint, which you should be doing since thats what law and punishment are. Emotionless, logical and unbias. You're suggesting we give him a punishment that is reserved mainly for those who take life of someone else, and even then, most states won't even think about the death penalty unless you are guilty of multiple homicides.

I don't care what happened to your girlfriend. Its sad, ya I understand, but that doesn't mean I'm gonna give this man (If he was in the U.S., but he's in the UK and you're still pushing for the death penalty.)anymore jail time then his crime requires as punishment. Anything more is a violation of his 8th constitutional right. And according to the numbers, this is the average jail time for that crime. He got his fitting punishment.
Short answer: No. I still think he should be put to the death.

Long answer: same as short. I guess where done here.
 

Lord Beautiful

New member
Aug 13, 2008
5,940
0
0
Seeing as there are seven pages of material I've yet (and lack the patience) to read, I'll just go ahead and say this:

To those of you wanting this guy hanged/shanked/beaten/rick rolled/gagged/brutalized, just comfort yourself with the knowledge of what happens to child molesters in prison.

3.5 years is more time than this man has left to live.
 

maddawg IAJI

I prefer the term "Zomguard"
Feb 12, 2009
7,840
0
0
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
BathorysGraveland said:
Isn't 9-11 a little old for it be actual paedophilia?
Its actually in the right age range for pedophilia. Pedophilia is the attraction to children who had not yet gone through puberty.
Seanfall said:
....What happened to the good old days when we use to Hang these mother fuckers?
We kinda grew the fuck up and stopped being barbarians and decided "Ya know, it probably would be a tad hypocritical to fucking hang people over a mental defect." :/
Again explain to me, and give me some cited example of how it is a mental Defect? Cause so far people saying it is doesn't make it so. And rather it is or isn't. Means jack. If it IS, which I don't think it is, that means that no amount of self control can or will fix him, meaning he needs to be separated or put down. This isn't some guy like Rain man or Forrest Gump this is a guy who raped and molested a kid. Big freaking difference.
As a medical diagnosis, pedophilia, or paedophilia, is defined as a psychiatric disorder... [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#cite_note-dsm4-0]

If you don't like Wikipedia, may I suggest Encylopedia Britannica, which says the exact same thing in the very first line. I don't know who you're talking to, but they're wrong. It is a disorder of the brain.

And again, no! They can not be killed or lose their right to liberty without due process. Its a basic fundamental right that all men and woman have. Even then, just because he suffers from said disorder, its no reason to send him off to a deserted island. There are several people who have been diagnosed with Pedophilia that don't act on the urges, including several celebrities.

Its honestly bad enough that you push for the fucking death sentence, now you wanna deny people civil liabilities?
I know people life with pedophilic urges and don't act on them. BUT HE DID! And Yes I think Pedophiles should get the Death Sentence.
I stopped reading right here. I don't give a fuck what you have to say anymore. I'm not arguing with someone who thinks that a man who actually got a harsher sentence then the national average for his crime should be put the death. You have no grasp of what the purpose of law and punishment is if you think the death sentence is a reasonable punishment.
News Flash: The Death Sentence is used in a lot of states. It's legal. We just need to broaden who can be given it.
News Flash: This happened in the UK, where the death sentence is illegal. Even then, it doesn't even fucking matter because the death sentence doesn't fucking work. It doesn't rehabilitate the detained (How can you when they're dead?) and it doesn't intimidate (States with the death sentence actually have far higher crime rates then most who don't.) Even then, the supreme court ruled you can't give the death sentence for those guilty of rape, which is what this is! Statutory Rape!

Look up Kennedy v. Louisiana and see for yourself.
Never said I cared about Rehabilitation. And again I said it should be expanded on.
Well too fucking bad, because without rehabilitation, we'd be up to our motherfucking eye balls in prisoners. And again, too fucking bad, its already been ruled as unconstitutional by the supreme court of the US. To expand it, you'd either have to become president and replace at least 5 members of the supreme court or you'd have to get rid of the constitution, both of which aren't reasonable options. And even then, you couldn't do anything to this man because he is in the UK.

Just face it dude, you have an unreasonable sense of justice and seem harbor far too much of a grudge for a man who got the right punishment for his crime.
As far as I know The Death Peantly is still legal in several states. And no I don't harbor a grudge. And I don't think he got the right punishment. I will not 'just face it' cause these are my personal beliefs. I won't face it anymore then you will about your beliefs. And calling it statutory Rape is an understatement. I've known people who have this done them. One of my girlfreinds had something similar done to her, we were together for 3 years before she told me. And it still hurt her, so forgive me if I don't an ounce of mercy in me for these people.
Ya, most states do use the death penalty. About 30/50, but that number gets lower and lower with every passing decade. Heck, just last year, we had 14 states repeal their death penalty laws. There are even some states out there that haven't killed anyone on the death penalty since 1976. The only few places where the death penalty is used as a punishment heavily, is in the deep south.

I'm not asking you to have mercy for child molesters. I'm asking you to put your damn personal emotions aside and look at this from a logical standpoint, which you should be doing since thats what law and punishment are. Emotionless, logical and unbias. You're suggesting we give him a punishment that is reserved mainly for those who take life of someone else, and even then, most states won't even think about the death penalty unless you are guilty of multiple homicides.

I don't care what happened to your girlfriend. Its sad, ya I understand, but that doesn't mean I'm gonna give this man (If he was in the U.S., but he's in the UK and you're still pushing for the death penalty.)anymore jail time then his crime requires as punishment. Anything more is a violation of his 8th constitutional right. And according to the numbers, this is the average jail time for that crime. He got his fitting punishment.
Short answer: No. I still think he should be put to the death.

Long answer: same as short. I guess where done here.
Standard response: I guess so, and I guess I should thank some deity that you're not in charge of the justice system. I have no doubt in my mind that you'd run it aground within minutes.


Seanfall said:
TLDR: You people are nuts. I'm sick of defending my beliefs.
We're nuts? You wanna fucking murder someone! Your beliefs are backed by nothing, but pure emotion, with no logic or evidence to back them up. If you wanna go to a place where people are charged heavily for crimes, move the middle east. At least there, they stone you for the simplest thing.

Fuck man, I've never seen so much ignorance and hate from one person.
 

Seanfall

New member
May 3, 2011
460
0
0
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
BathorysGraveland said:
Isn't 9-11 a little old for it be actual paedophilia?
Its actually in the right age range for pedophilia. Pedophilia is the attraction to children who had not yet gone through puberty.
Seanfall said:
....What happened to the good old days when we use to Hang these mother fuckers?
We kinda grew the fuck up and stopped being barbarians and decided "Ya know, it probably would be a tad hypocritical to fucking hang people over a mental defect." :/
Again explain to me, and give me some cited example of how it is a mental Defect? Cause so far people saying it is doesn't make it so. And rather it is or isn't. Means jack. If it IS, which I don't think it is, that means that no amount of self control can or will fix him, meaning he needs to be separated or put down. This isn't some guy like Rain man or Forrest Gump this is a guy who raped and molested a kid. Big freaking difference.
As a medical diagnosis, pedophilia, or paedophilia, is defined as a psychiatric disorder... [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#cite_note-dsm4-0]

If you don't like Wikipedia, may I suggest Encylopedia Britannica, which says the exact same thing in the very first line. I don't know who you're talking to, but they're wrong. It is a disorder of the brain.

And again, no! They can not be killed or lose their right to liberty without due process. Its a basic fundamental right that all men and woman have. Even then, just because he suffers from said disorder, its no reason to send him off to a deserted island. There are several people who have been diagnosed with Pedophilia that don't act on the urges, including several celebrities.

Its honestly bad enough that you push for the fucking death sentence, now you wanna deny people civil liabilities?
I know people life with pedophilic urges and don't act on them. BUT HE DID! And Yes I think Pedophiles should get the Death Sentence.
I stopped reading right here. I don't give a fuck what you have to say anymore. I'm not arguing with someone who thinks that a man who actually got a harsher sentence then the national average for his crime should be put the death. You have no grasp of what the purpose of law and punishment is if you think the death sentence is a reasonable punishment.
News Flash: The Death Sentence is used in a lot of states. It's legal. We just need to broaden who can be given it.
News Flash: This happened in the UK, where the death sentence is illegal. Even then, it doesn't even fucking matter because the death sentence doesn't fucking work. It doesn't rehabilitate the detained (How can you when they're dead?) and it doesn't intimidate (States with the death sentence actually have far higher crime rates then most who don't.) Even then, the supreme court ruled you can't give the death sentence for those guilty of rape, which is what this is! Statutory Rape!

Look up Kennedy v. Louisiana and see for yourself.
Never said I cared about Rehabilitation. And again I said it should be expanded on.
Well too fucking bad, because without rehabilitation, we'd be up to our motherfucking eye balls in prisoners. And again, too fucking bad, its already been ruled as unconstitutional by the supreme court of the US. To expand it, you'd either have to become president and replace at least 5 members of the supreme court or you'd have to get rid of the constitution, both of which aren't reasonable options. And even then, you couldn't do anything to this man because he is in the UK.

Just face it dude, you have an unreasonable sense of justice and seem harbor far too much of a grudge for a man who got the right punishment for his crime.
As far as I know The Death Peantly is still legal in several states. And no I don't harbor a grudge. And I don't think he got the right punishment. I will not 'just face it' cause these are my personal beliefs. I won't face it anymore then you will about your beliefs. And calling it statutory Rape is an understatement. I've known people who have this done them. One of my girlfreinds had something similar done to her, we were together for 3 years before she told me. And it still hurt her, so forgive me if I don't an ounce of mercy in me for these people.
Ya, most states do use the death penalty. About 30/50, but that number gets lower and lower with every passing decade. Heck, just last year, we had 14 states repeal their death penalty laws. There are even some states out there that haven't killed anyone on the death penalty since 1976. The only few places where the death penalty is used as a punishment heavily, is in the deep south.

I'm not asking you to have mercy for child molesters. I'm asking you to put your damn personal emotions aside and look at this from a logical standpoint, which you should be doing since thats what law and punishment are. Emotionless, logical and unbias. You're suggesting we give him a punishment that is reserved mainly for those who take life of someone else, and even then, most states won't even think about the death penalty unless you are guilty of multiple homicides.

I don't care what happened to your girlfriend. Its sad, ya I understand, but that doesn't mean I'm gonna give this man (If he was in the U.S., but he's in the UK and you're still pushing for the death penalty.)anymore jail time then his crime requires as punishment. Anything more is a violation of his 8th constitutional right. And according to the numbers, this is the average jail time for that crime. He got his fitting punishment.
Short answer: No. I still think he should be put to the death.

Long answer: same as short. I guess where done here.
Standard response: I guess so, and I guess I should thank some deity that you're not in charge of the justice system. I have no doubt in my mind that you'd run it aground within minutes.


Seanfall said:
TLDR: You people are nuts. I'm sick of defending my beliefs.
We're nuts? You wanna fucking murder someone! Your beliefs are backed by nothing, but pure emotion, with no logic or evidence to back them up. If you wanna go to a place where people are charged heavily for crimes, move the middle east. At least there, they stone you for the simplest thing.

Fuck man, I've never seen so much ignorance and hate from one person.
Okay...that was out of line. I didn't agree with you but I never attacked you personally.
 

maddawg IAJI

I prefer the term "Zomguard"
Feb 12, 2009
7,840
0
0
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
BathorysGraveland said:
Isn't 9-11 a little old for it be actual paedophilia?
Its actually in the right age range for pedophilia. Pedophilia is the attraction to children who had not yet gone through puberty.
Seanfall said:
....What happened to the good old days when we use to Hang these mother fuckers?
We kinda grew the fuck up and stopped being barbarians and decided "Ya know, it probably would be a tad hypocritical to fucking hang people over a mental defect." :/
Again explain to me, and give me some cited example of how it is a mental Defect? Cause so far people saying it is doesn't make it so. And rather it is or isn't. Means jack. If it IS, which I don't think it is, that means that no amount of self control can or will fix him, meaning he needs to be separated or put down. This isn't some guy like Rain man or Forrest Gump this is a guy who raped and molested a kid. Big freaking difference.
As a medical diagnosis, pedophilia, or paedophilia, is defined as a psychiatric disorder... [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#cite_note-dsm4-0]

If you don't like Wikipedia, may I suggest Encylopedia Britannica, which says the exact same thing in the very first line. I don't know who you're talking to, but they're wrong. It is a disorder of the brain.

And again, no! They can not be killed or lose their right to liberty without due process. Its a basic fundamental right that all men and woman have. Even then, just because he suffers from said disorder, its no reason to send him off to a deserted island. There are several people who have been diagnosed with Pedophilia that don't act on the urges, including several celebrities.

Its honestly bad enough that you push for the fucking death sentence, now you wanna deny people civil liabilities?
I know people life with pedophilic urges and don't act on them. BUT HE DID! And Yes I think Pedophiles should get the Death Sentence.
I stopped reading right here. I don't give a fuck what you have to say anymore. I'm not arguing with someone who thinks that a man who actually got a harsher sentence then the national average for his crime should be put the death. You have no grasp of what the purpose of law and punishment is if you think the death sentence is a reasonable punishment.
News Flash: The Death Sentence is used in a lot of states. It's legal. We just need to broaden who can be given it.
News Flash: This happened in the UK, where the death sentence is illegal. Even then, it doesn't even fucking matter because the death sentence doesn't fucking work. It doesn't rehabilitate the detained (How can you when they're dead?) and it doesn't intimidate (States with the death sentence actually have far higher crime rates then most who don't.) Even then, the supreme court ruled you can't give the death sentence for those guilty of rape, which is what this is! Statutory Rape!

Look up Kennedy v. Louisiana and see for yourself.
Never said I cared about Rehabilitation. And again I said it should be expanded on.
Well too fucking bad, because without rehabilitation, we'd be up to our motherfucking eye balls in prisoners. And again, too fucking bad, its already been ruled as unconstitutional by the supreme court of the US. To expand it, you'd either have to become president and replace at least 5 members of the supreme court or you'd have to get rid of the constitution, both of which aren't reasonable options. And even then, you couldn't do anything to this man because he is in the UK.

Just face it dude, you have an unreasonable sense of justice and seem harbor far too much of a grudge for a man who got the right punishment for his crime.
As far as I know The Death Peantly is still legal in several states. And no I don't harbor a grudge. And I don't think he got the right punishment. I will not 'just face it' cause these are my personal beliefs. I won't face it anymore then you will about your beliefs. And calling it statutory Rape is an understatement. I've known people who have this done them. One of my girlfreinds had something similar done to her, we were together for 3 years before she told me. And it still hurt her, so forgive me if I don't an ounce of mercy in me for these people.
Ya, most states do use the death penalty. About 30/50, but that number gets lower and lower with every passing decade. Heck, just last year, we had 14 states repeal their death penalty laws. There are even some states out there that haven't killed anyone on the death penalty since 1976. The only few places where the death penalty is used as a punishment heavily, is in the deep south.

I'm not asking you to have mercy for child molesters. I'm asking you to put your damn personal emotions aside and look at this from a logical standpoint, which you should be doing since thats what law and punishment are. Emotionless, logical and unbias. You're suggesting we give him a punishment that is reserved mainly for those who take life of someone else, and even then, most states won't even think about the death penalty unless you are guilty of multiple homicides.

I don't care what happened to your girlfriend. Its sad, ya I understand, but that doesn't mean I'm gonna give this man (If he was in the U.S., but he's in the UK and you're still pushing for the death penalty.)anymore jail time then his crime requires as punishment. Anything more is a violation of his 8th constitutional right. And according to the numbers, this is the average jail time for that crime. He got his fitting punishment.
Short answer: No. I still think he should be put to the death.

Long answer: same as short. I guess where done here.
Standard response: I guess so, and I guess I should thank some deity that you're not in charge of the justice system. I have no doubt in my mind that you'd run it aground within minutes.


Seanfall said:
TLDR: You people are nuts. I'm sick of defending my beliefs.
We're nuts? You wanna fucking murder someone! Your beliefs are backed by nothing, but pure emotion, with no logic or evidence to back them up. If you wanna go to a place where people are charged heavily for crimes, move the middle east. At least there, they stone you for the simplest thing.

Fuck man, I've never seen so much ignorance and hate from one person.
Okay...that was out of line. I didn't agree with you but I never attacked you personally.
You're right! You never attacked me personally, but I'm sure none of the people here who have pointed out your lack of logic, myself included, don't appreciate being called
Seanfall said:
bleeding heart idiots
So you'll have to excuse me if I think you went over the edge already.

edit: Also, you'll find that I'm never nice to those who believe we should enforce harsher penalties on a person for something out of his or her control. We left the 50s a long time ago dude.
 

Seanfall

New member
May 3, 2011
460
0
0
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Seanfall said:
maddawg IAJI said:
BathorysGraveland said:
Isn't 9-11 a little old for it be actual paedophilia?
Its actually in the right age range for pedophilia. Pedophilia is the attraction to children who had not yet gone through puberty.
Seanfall said:
....What happened to the good old days when we use to Hang these mother fuckers?
We kinda grew the fuck up and stopped being barbarians and decided "Ya know, it probably would be a tad hypocritical to fucking hang people over a mental defect." :/
Again explain to me, and give me some cited example of how it is a mental Defect? Cause so far people saying it is doesn't make it so. And rather it is or isn't. Means jack. If it IS, which I don't think it is, that means that no amount of self control can or will fix him, meaning he needs to be separated or put down. This isn't some guy like Rain man or Forrest Gump this is a guy who raped and molested a kid. Big freaking difference.
As a medical diagnosis, pedophilia, or paedophilia, is defined as a psychiatric disorder... [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#cite_note-dsm4-0]

If you don't like Wikipedia, may I suggest Encylopedia Britannica, which says the exact same thing in the very first line. I don't know who you're talking to, but they're wrong. It is a disorder of the brain.

And again, no! They can not be killed or lose their right to liberty without due process. Its a basic fundamental right that all men and woman have. Even then, just because he suffers from said disorder, its no reason to send him off to a deserted island. There are several people who have been diagnosed with Pedophilia that don't act on the urges, including several celebrities.

Its honestly bad enough that you push for the fucking death sentence, now you wanna deny people civil liabilities?
I know people life with pedophilic urges and don't act on them. BUT HE DID! And Yes I think Pedophiles should get the Death Sentence.
I stopped reading right here. I don't give a fuck what you have to say anymore. I'm not arguing with someone who thinks that a man who actually got a harsher sentence then the national average for his crime should be put the death. You have no grasp of what the purpose of law and punishment is if you think the death sentence is a reasonable punishment.
News Flash: The Death Sentence is used in a lot of states. It's legal. We just need to broaden who can be given it.
News Flash: This happened in the UK, where the death sentence is illegal. Even then, it doesn't even fucking matter because the death sentence doesn't fucking work. It doesn't rehabilitate the detained (How can you when they're dead?) and it doesn't intimidate (States with the death sentence actually have far higher crime rates then most who don't.) Even then, the supreme court ruled you can't give the death sentence for those guilty of rape, which is what this is! Statutory Rape!

Look up Kennedy v. Louisiana and see for yourself.
Never said I cared about Rehabilitation. And again I said it should be expanded on.
Well too fucking bad, because without rehabilitation, we'd be up to our motherfucking eye balls in prisoners. And again, too fucking bad, its already been ruled as unconstitutional by the supreme court of the US. To expand it, you'd either have to become president and replace at least 5 members of the supreme court or you'd have to get rid of the constitution, both of which aren't reasonable options. And even then, you couldn't do anything to this man because he is in the UK.

Just face it dude, you have an unreasonable sense of justice and seem harbor far too much of a grudge for a man who got the right punishment for his crime.
As far as I know The Death Peantly is still legal in several states. And no I don't harbor a grudge. And I don't think he got the right punishment. I will not 'just face it' cause these are my personal beliefs. I won't face it anymore then you will about your beliefs. And calling it statutory Rape is an understatement. I've known people who have this done them. One of my girlfreinds had something similar done to her, we were together for 3 years before she told me. And it still hurt her, so forgive me if I don't an ounce of mercy in me for these people.
Ya, most states do use the death penalty. About 30/50, but that number gets lower and lower with every passing decade. Heck, just last year, we had 14 states repeal their death penalty laws. There are even some states out there that haven't killed anyone on the death penalty since 1976. The only few places where the death penalty is used as a punishment heavily, is in the deep south.

I'm not asking you to have mercy for child molesters. I'm asking you to put your damn personal emotions aside and look at this from a logical standpoint, which you should be doing since thats what law and punishment are. Emotionless, logical and unbias. You're suggesting we give him a punishment that is reserved mainly for those who take life of someone else, and even then, most states won't even think about the death penalty unless you are guilty of multiple homicides.

I don't care what happened to your girlfriend. Its sad, ya I understand, but that doesn't mean I'm gonna give this man (If he was in the U.S., but he's in the UK and you're still pushing for the death penalty.)anymore jail time then his crime requires as punishment. Anything more is a violation of his 8th constitutional right. And according to the numbers, this is the average jail time for that crime. He got his fitting punishment.
Short answer: No. I still think he should be put to the death.

Long answer: same as short. I guess where done here.
Standard response: I guess so, and I guess I should thank some deity that you're not in charge of the justice system. I have no doubt in my mind that you'd run it aground within minutes.


Seanfall said:
TLDR: You people are nuts. I'm sick of defending my beliefs.
We're nuts? You wanna fucking murder someone! Your beliefs are backed by nothing, but pure emotion, with no logic or evidence to back them up. If you wanna go to a place where people are charged heavily for crimes, move the middle east. At least there, they stone you for the simplest thing.

Fuck man, I've never seen so much ignorance and hate from one person.
Okay...that was out of line. I didn't agree with you but I never attacked you personally.
You're right! You never attacked me personally, but I'm sure none of the people here who have pointed out your lack of logic, myself included, don't appreciate being called
Seanfall said:
bleeding heart idiots
So you'll have to excuse me if I think you went over the edge already.

edit: Also, you'll find that I'm never nice to those who believe we should enforce harsher penalties on a person for something out of his or her control. We left the 50s a long time ago dude.
I said I was done arguing with you so...

*kisses* You be good now. *pats you on the head* GET ON THE LOVE TRAIN THE LOVE TRAIN!!

Also sense you've been pushing for rehabilitation doesn't that imply that it ISN'T out of his control?
 

Comando96

New member
May 26, 2009
637
0
0
Seanfall said:
....okay so you take my comment out of context and apply it to everyone with a handicap? Your seriously comparing war vets, and jews to a fucking pedophile? ...holy shit...everyone on this site has their head up their asses. Fine you bleeding heart idiots win. I'll stop posting that someone who raped a kid deserves a harsh punishment. I mean expecting someone who raped a 9 year old and then kept doing it for 2 years should be put away for at least life is obviously a crazy thing to say. No much better we reform him, hey about we give him a job cleaning bathrooms in an elementry school. After all...he's only a pedophile.

TLDR: You people are nuts. I'm sick of defending my beliefs.
You got a warning for that... really? xD
Guess one of the Mods doesn't like you. Ignorant (lack of knowlage) that post may be I wouldn't give you a warning for ignorance. I'd try to educate you.

OK here is a long shot but I'll try none the less.

---------------------

We as a human being are made from 2 different things:
1) Our DNA which we inherited.
2) Our environment which shapes us. This includes our physical surroundings (ie a house or a cave, warmth or cold) but also the people around us and our interactions with them.

If I've lost you or you don't understand that, stop reading... there is no point. Hopefully you haven't stopped though.

Our Brain is incredibly complex and consists of the same DNA environment mix but the environmental impact is much much more. We adapt to our surroundings and our understandings of them. Language, culture, the notions of; trust, love, bonds with individuals like parents and siblings.

This is cause and effect.
An example of this in humans. If the mother does not hold the child when young, does not form a bond with the child and no one else forms the motherly bond with the child then in later life said individual will find it hard forming relationships with others, and may have "problems" staying loyal to someone in a relationship. Also if said individual becomes a parent... they won't know how to make a bond with their child unless they are helped to by their partner, their life experiences or... someone else.

So the person wasn't hugged as a child and that lead to a different individual detached more from relationships bla bla etc etc.

So... what causes someone to become a paedophile?
DNA and enviroment.

There has been a glitch in the Matrix of the noggin...

Here is something from my local newspaper:
http://www.herefordtimes.com/news/9376096.SAS_soldier_convicted_of_child_abuse_charges/

Soldiers are a key example of things going weird with the brain. Men who are taught for years and years of their life to become the most effective killing machines on the planet. Taught to ignore emotion and to make killing an instinct.
You then let these people loose onto the streets and expect things to be just fine?
My dad was in the sas and is now a full time alcoholic, unable to cope with everything he has done in his lifetime. He then drinks to make the screaming in his head stop (not literally).

The soldier in the article... after his service... for some reason abused children... why? I dunno because I'm not him. However we as we are judge this man to be evil and lock him away?
Why do we think he is the problem... this is what he was he was turned into by his nation. He joined the army and its likely that this contributed to him ruining the lives of innocent children.

There are 2 other common reasons for the urge to do this to children... or rape in general (but raping a child is both worse and rarer).
Genes which... you can't help with that problem... not yet... not yet.
Abuse as a child. Its strange at first but... anger breeds anger, violence breeds violence and... Sexual Abuse breeds sexual abuse under certain conditions. Those conditions being, no one knows about the abuse for a long~ish period of time and the damage is done to the child. If its found about early on then a councillor can be brought into the scenario and the damage limited significantly.

The fact still remains though that feeling such things are not a persons fault, but how a person has been constructed. Those problems being caused by the problems or faults of others and so on and so... considering that it's a rather good surprise that we've pulled ourselves up so far out of the dirt...

-

Considering this... why do we punish people?
Deterrents!

To say "if you do this, you will be punished" means some of those who would have taken an action will not.

If you do not punish people then... there is no deterrent and(example) you could kill people at will... which is silly.

However deterrents only do so much. People ignore deterrents for one reason or the other.
It's a mistake to think most who commit crimes of this nature believe they won't be caught... as you have quite a few repeat offenders. They know they may be able to dodge a bullet or two my chance but it's just that... chance. If someone digs deep into a situation or a victim speaks out they get caught. "It is only very, very stupid people who think the law is stupid".

When deterrents fail you need back up systems and counter-measures.

When someone gets caught get them in a cell and have the child seen to with councillors and psychologists as a means of damage limitation.

Now the offender is in a cell... what to do with them... that is the question.

First option is the simple "Kill them" option. This is outdated, Medieval and frankly barbaric. The idea these people are evil is a superstitious Religious one at best that suggests we control ourselves solely through our spirits... which is bullshit to an incredibly large extent and most of the time we are a product constructed by others who is then let out to run around freely.

The supporting argument to this is that these people will never be cured and are a public menace. We could keep them forever imprisoned or kill them off, and killing them saves on resources.

Public menace in their current form. Yes. They are damaging people by abusing them and ruining part of their lives. The effects of that will be felt for possibly generations down the line due to the effects it has breeds on the persons offspring and so on and so forth.
Drain on resources? Here we come to my comparison between those in wheelchairs and Paedophiles. A lot of people who are in wheelchairs are a burden in some form or another on society. In the western world we are happily able to fit them into our society and give them meaningful existences to unquestioningly justify their existence. However not all. Some cases it would be argued by a supporter of Eugenics that they should be "removed" to make way for more appropriate people.
People who's condition may be no fault of their own removed from society for something that impedes them as a value to it... sound familiar?

If you think these people should be killed... just say so... both groups... you don't get to pick and choose as that would be hypocritical. Both are in effect that same but one is more damaging to society and is demonized as well... (religion popping up again). The argument for getting rid of one however is the same as the other. (I'd keep both btw)

Second option is to let them rot in prison. Err... pardon? Firstly they are a human being and to put them in prison until they die... they hold some responsibility but not enough to warrant a life of containment within a prison. Secondly they are a body sitting in a cell doing fuck all which could be doing anything else. It makes no sense to keep them in prison unless you simply cannot release them into the general public ever again... which brings us back to the first "final solution" which... yeah.

Thrid option is Prison then rehabilitation. As said earlier if we don't have deterrents even as ineffective as they have proven themselves to be there would be more crimes than if they were there. They serve a sentence but then a treated like anyone else who has a mental disorder. The video I linked in my previous post is one method of doing this. The people are kept in an open but safe facility where the offenders stay in an environment where they cannot harm the rest of society but are a lot more free than a prison. Them having been in prison then servers as an encouragement to cooperate in their own rehabilitation. If without doubt they have been cured of their urges (which can be tested through means of pupil dilation, sweat, erectile signs) then they can be reintegrated with society in a location without a unnecessary abundance of children. Also if or when reintegrated the individual should not suffer temptation or access to children so no I'd never let someone convicted of sexually abusing or even harassing a child into a school... You'd have to be a fucking idiot to do that.

-----------------------------------------

Where I differ from you on this matter is simple... a good chunk of this is not their own fault it is that of someone elses or even just chance (DNA). People who do things like this are often far beyond saving but that never means you shouldn't attempt to help them as helping them is helping ourselves, future generations and will stop potential victims. you would happily demonize them and frankly I think you and people like you are part of the problem.

Rehabilitation can only happen if people see that they have a problem AND ARE WILLING TO COME FORWARD. If every time you hear the word Paedophile people reach for the pitchforks... no wonder people hide away... they hide themselves and their true feelings and thoughts... and when an opportunity comes forth they are overcome.

We need an environment where people can come forth if they have these thoughts and feelings and not be demonized by society outright for having them as they are not evil, and frankly not admitting them currently is merely self preservation. If people are able and encouraged to admit them then, they can get help before anything happens and we could save innocent children from harm, instead of picking up the pieces afterwards...

Think about this if you bother to read it... think about it very hard... thank that you and those like you may have passively caused children to suffer abuse... once you have thought about it... stop doing it and stop other when you see not helping the situation.
 

5ilver

New member
Aug 25, 2010
341
0
0
What exactly are you unhappy about? Is 3.5 too little or too much? Your post seems very vague, OP.

As far as the news article, I'm not surprised. Kotaku often posts such garbage and the current law system is very naive- to the point of hilarity at times. I imagine people a few centuries from now will laugh at our double standarts (it's okay to be gay but sex with children- THAT'S CROSSING THE LINE, rofl).
 

FamoFunk

Dad, I'm in space.
Mar 10, 2010
2,628
0
0
Nintendo save the day.

Really sad story and yes, it'll feel like 3.5 isn't justice, especially for the victim and her family.