This is the first time I was happy that I didn't have money to pre-order a game I was nostalgically interested in.
The game is a complete failure.
Cool Welshy said:
Sansha said:
Personally I'm going to use this to buy Portal2, which I should have done a long, long time ago.
A wise move. Duke was a time capsule of the Nineties, and it's problem is that we've advanced from them. It's about time we got a new king to hail.
Actually the game would have done fine if not great if it had stuck to its nineties roots. I played Duke Nukem back in the day, and seeing all the trailers, footage from reviews, and what they did to the health and gun mechanics, this game was nothing like what the Duke was in the nineties. As I have said in other treads, Nukem had always been crude and crass with some things, but DNF threw out the well handled mature jokes and themes, and just spewed out and overload of stuff that was over the top and made no sense.
So, don't blame that it is dated because it is like what its predecessor was, because it is nothing like its predecessor, if it had been it would have been a great game.
Jaime_Wolf said:
An outdated game concept that was arguably poorly executed in the first place didn't translate into a modern masterpiece? Imagine my surprise.
The reason it didn't translate is because they took nothing from the old games to translate except the image of the character Duke Nukem. It would have succeed fine in this generation if they had just made it exactly like Duke Nukem 3D and just gave it better graphics and different levels.
True Nukem fans were expecting the game to have have health packs, being able to carry all guns, and the game play to be a straight, functional, and properly done non-serious shooter. It probably was that when Gearbox got a hold of it, but they scrapped that because they wanted to change the mechanics to be like all other shooters, because "that is what sells".
Gearbox needs to make a public apology to fans of the series, and give refunds to all that want it.
Senrab said:
So... you bought Dook, expecting it to change the world, then were disappointed that you only got one playthrough from it, and now you're going to buy Portal 2? You're a real glutton for punishment, aren't ya?
No, I betting he was expecting it was going to be like Duke Nukem 3D but with graphics of this generation.
Only people that rode the hype of the whole 12 year development meme, thought it was going to change the world.
True fans of the series are pissed because they expected a classic non-serious shooter(Health packs and being able to carry all guns(which would work on consoles)), but what they got was Call of Duke Halo. As I have said, the crude humor and themes weren't even handled like it was back then. Comparing it, the crude humor and themes back then were handled elegantly compared to DNF.
Besides, I think the guy's choice in change is fine, because if he likes Portal 2 a third as much as much as I liked the first Portal, he will play it at least 3 times if not more.
Drakmeire said:
You can't go in expecting 14+ years of greatness. while going through several development cycles the best you can hope for is a nostalgic, self-aware, witty game. and I feel that for the most part it delivers on that.
It delivers nothing from nostalgia. As I point out in all my comments above. It has nothing from DN3D. I will amend what I have said above, the only other thing it has other than the graphic of Duke Nukem, is naked chicks, but even that isn't handled like 3D.