Update: I GOT a refund for DNF

Recommended Videos

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,250
0
0
Cool Welshy said:
Sansha said:
Personally I'm going to use this to buy Portal2, which I should have done a long, long time ago.
A wise move. Duke was a time capsule of the Nineties, and it's problem is that we've advanced from them. It's about time we got a new king to hail.
If Duke was a time capsule from the 90's it may not have been a big deal. Duke himself is but the gameplay and visuals are all firmly rooted in the here-and-now. 2-weapon limit, no boot, every color from grey-to-brown, suck your thumb behind a rock to heal...This is like the Captain America of Gaming. An icon from a bigone era is unfrozen, tries to conform to the norms of today and is hated for it (ok, this is the 60's era Cap who fights commies but still)

I don't think people would be as pissed at DNF if it was a Goldeneye/ Perfect Dark clone or, a Doom/Wolfenstein clone like 3D was.
 

Comic Sans

DOWN YOU GO!
Oct 15, 2008
598
2
23
Country
United States
I was in Gamestop for maybe 15 minutes today. In that time, 3 people traded the game back in. The game seems to be horrific, and is exactly the opposite of what people wanted from a Duke game.
 

TacticalAssassin1

Elite Member
May 29, 2009
1,059
0
41
TU4AR said:
Interesting fact about Duke Nukem 3D: It was never intended as a humour game. The jokes, the strippers, this was all inserted after the game was finished. It was a game first and comedy second. Building a game around flinging shit and abortion jokes? That's just crap.
And yet the only good thing about the game was it's humor?
Wow...
 

userwhoquitthesite

New member
Jul 23, 2009
2,177
0
0
...I actually like it.
Yes, Duke is a terrible human being, yes he isn't cool like the game treats him, and yes the shooting is only functional at best.

This is exactly what I expected

I LOVE the horribly cheesy nerdy pop culture jokes. I love how over-the-top-bullshit Duke is.

I even like the broken gameplay, it makes the game nostalgically difficult.



Plus, boobs. And rats in microwaves


WHY THE GOD DAMN HELL NOT?!
 

Senrab

New member
Mar 22, 2008
226
0
0
So... you bought Dook, expecting it to change the world, then were disappointed that you only got one playthrough from it, and now you're going to buy Portal 2? You're a real glutton for punishment, aren't ya?
 

Nexus4

New member
Jul 13, 2010
552
0
0
Senrab said:
So... you bought Dook, expecting it to change the world, then were disappointed that you only got one playthrough from it, and now you're going to buy Portal 2? You're a real glutton for punishment, aren't ya?
Doesn't really matter. He didn't like the game, so he's trading it in for a game that appeals to him a bit better. I'm sure anyone would do the same if they hated it enough.
 

Firia

New member
Sep 17, 2007
1,945
0
0
Jodah said:
And that, my friends, is why I only get shooters via Gamefly. I never play multiplayer and the single player is rarely worth 60 dollars.
The amazement over the refund actually happening has me a little concerned. I NEVER buy digital distribution over steam (but I do over ps3), and I was actually beginning to have second thoughts about that. Now I'm not so sure. Kudos to the renting idea.
 

Jaime_Wolf

New member
Jul 17, 2009
1,194
0
0
An outdated game concept that was arguably poorly executed in the first place didn't translate into a modern masterpiece? Imagine my surprise.

People keep forgetting the amount of nostalgia involved in memories of the old games and they also keep forgetting the core audience of the old games: think about the kind of people who played games like Duke Nukem when they first came out. It's easy to forget how much wider the gaming community has gotten. This was a series of games aimed at arguably the most immature group of gamers (no offence meant to any particular people) there has ever been, composed mostly of straight white male social pariahs. And even those people have grown up a lot since then for the most part.

The old games were clearly a satire on 80s action heroes, but I always got the sense that there was a sort of wink and a nod making sure everyone knew that the satirical element was at least partially a cover-up for glorifying the very things it claimed to be satirising. Ironically, a lot of the parody of the babe-slapping, beer-swilling male douchebag fantasy seemed a bit less than sincere to me. A parody of porn involving naked people having sex is still porn.

Still, I do not even begin to understand why they gave you a refund. As others have said, you're paying them for the content of the game, not some nebulous value you hope to derive from it. They delivered on their end of the deal and you basically got to play an entire game for free. You essentially stole the game.

Firia said:
Jodah said:
And that, my friends, is why I only get shooters via Gamefly. I never play multiplayer and the single player is rarely worth 60 dollars.
The amazement over the refund actually happening has me a little concerned. I NEVER buy digital distribution over steam (but I do over ps3), and I was actually beginning to have second thoughts about that. Now I'm not so sure. Kudos to the renting idea.
Are you also wary of eating in restaurants because, after clearing the entire plate, you might not be able to return the food?
 

ultimateownage

This name was cool in 2008.
Feb 11, 2009
5,346
0
41
I'm planning on getting a refund.
Not because the game sucks, but because of how shitty the Balls of Steel Edition is. All two of the pokerchips feel horrible and rough. The dice while supposed to be a clear red plastic look like they've been covered in dust, and they're also bent and the white paint meant for the sides is all over the fucking place. The Bust of duke is missing a nose, it wasn't even in the packaging so it must have been broken off during production and no one gave a shit.
 

ELD3RGoD

New member
Apr 23, 2010
210
0
0
I got compensated for buying Half Life: Source when I meant to buy the original version ^.^
 

Sonic Doctor

Time Lord / Whack-A-Newbie!
Jan 9, 2010
3,042
0
0
This is the first time I was happy that I didn't have money to pre-order a game I was nostalgically interested in.

The game is a complete failure.

Cool Welshy said:
Sansha said:
Personally I'm going to use this to buy Portal2, which I should have done a long, long time ago.
A wise move. Duke was a time capsule of the Nineties, and it's problem is that we've advanced from them. It's about time we got a new king to hail.
Actually the game would have done fine if not great if it had stuck to its nineties roots. I played Duke Nukem back in the day, and seeing all the trailers, footage from reviews, and what they did to the health and gun mechanics, this game was nothing like what the Duke was in the nineties. As I have said in other treads, Nukem had always been crude and crass with some things, but DNF threw out the well handled mature jokes and themes, and just spewed out and overload of stuff that was over the top and made no sense.

So, don't blame that it is dated because it is like what its predecessor was, because it is nothing like its predecessor, if it had been it would have been a great game.

Jaime_Wolf said:
An outdated game concept that was arguably poorly executed in the first place didn't translate into a modern masterpiece? Imagine my surprise.
The reason it didn't translate is because they took nothing from the old games to translate except the image of the character Duke Nukem. It would have succeed fine in this generation if they had just made it exactly like Duke Nukem 3D and just gave it better graphics and different levels.

True Nukem fans were expecting the game to have have health packs, being able to carry all guns, and the game play to be a straight, functional, and properly done non-serious shooter. It probably was that when Gearbox got a hold of it, but they scrapped that because they wanted to change the mechanics to be like all other shooters, because "that is what sells".

Gearbox needs to make a public apology to fans of the series, and give refunds to all that want it.

Senrab said:
So... you bought Dook, expecting it to change the world, then were disappointed that you only got one playthrough from it, and now you're going to buy Portal 2? You're a real glutton for punishment, aren't ya?
No, I betting he was expecting it was going to be like Duke Nukem 3D but with graphics of this generation.

Only people that rode the hype of the whole 12 year development meme, thought it was going to change the world.

True fans of the series are pissed because they expected a classic non-serious shooter(Health packs and being able to carry all guns(which would work on consoles)), but what they got was Call of Duke Halo. As I have said, the crude humor and themes weren't even handled like it was back then. Comparing it, the crude humor and themes back then were handled elegantly compared to DNF.

Besides, I think the guy's choice in change is fine, because if he likes Portal 2 a third as much as much as I liked the first Portal, he will play it at least 3 times if not more.

Drakmeire said:
You can't go in expecting 14+ years of greatness. while going through several development cycles the best you can hope for is a nostalgic, self-aware, witty game. and I feel that for the most part it delivers on that.
It delivers nothing from nostalgia. As I point out in all my comments above. It has nothing from DN3D. I will amend what I have said above, the only other thing it has other than the graphic of Duke Nukem, is naked chicks, but even that isn't handled like 3D.
 

Sonic Doctor

Time Lord / Whack-A-Newbie!
Jan 9, 2010
3,042
0
0
TU4AR said:
That picture actually got me thinking about what FPS in anyway is like shooters of old, and surprisingly, from what I have played, I came up with one.

Halo: ODST.

It actually combines both of the the styles.

The exploration of New Mombasa by the Rookie, is like the 2003 map. You explore inside buildings, out in the streets. It even has traditional Health packs for under the shields health.

It is like 2010 stile with the flashback points where the player takes on the roles of the other team members.

The game may have been short, but it was very well executed.
 

Jodah

New member
Aug 2, 2008
2,280
0
0
Firia said:
Jodah said:
And that, my friends, is why I only get shooters via Gamefly. I never play multiplayer and the single player is rarely worth 60 dollars.
The amazement over the refund actually happening has me a little concerned. I NEVER buy digital distribution over steam (but I do over ps3), and I was actually beginning to have second thoughts about that. Now I'm not so sure. Kudos to the renting idea.
Gamefly is great, it lets you play all the games you want. I still buy ones I know I will get my moneys worth for but it lets me play the weaker games (time wise anyways).
 

Akisa

New member
Jan 7, 2010
493
0
0
NJ said:
Mike Laserbeam said:
You are getting a refund from Steam?
ARE YOU NEO?!
I was send back and forth between EA and Valve over APB shutting down and getting a refund like a ping-pong ball and ended up getting jackshit >.<

This man IS Neo.
That's strange I got a refund from valve w/o hassle over APB.
 

LetalisK

New member
May 5, 2010
2,769
0
0
Jodah said:
And that, my friends, is why I only get shooters via Gamefly. I never play multiplayer and the single player is rarely worth 60 dollars.
I fucking love Gamefly. It makes gaming sooooo much cheaper.
 

TheKwertyeweyoppe

New member
Jan 1, 2010
118
0
0
Is this Steam support?
Hi, I'd like to refund a game
Yeah that one
Yeah I know it says I played it for 90 hours
And I got all of the acheivements, yes.
I just didn't enjoy it
Yeah, a full refund
What do you mean no!
Thats ridiculous!
Just unacceptable!

:p