Upsetting Trends That Bother You

Recommended Videos

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Harry Mason said:
But haven't you read any of the other posts on this thread? They say that racism and sexism "aren't really problems anymore!" That's good. It means we can all relax, right? The problems have just gone away, and anyone who brings up sexism or racism is just doing so to manipulate other people! I'm glad I don't have to worry my little white, heterosexual, male head anymore. Moral quandaries are inconvenient and confusing!
XD. I love it.

Seriously, a bunch of entitled privileged kids on the internet always seem to make that argument.

Because if a white, middle class teenage male doesn't see it, it doesn't exist.

It is funny, especially, because we ARE currently voting on minority rights, and the rights of women, in this country. right now. But minorities are totally equal, MIRITE???

On a similar note, I love how you can look at a rather diverse crowd on Wall Street, which includes veterans and even fiscal conservatives, and go RAWR FUCK YOU HIPPIES!

It's like people are looking for a reason to hate. From their comfy chairs and lives where they've probably never made a stand. Nor had to.
 

MysticToast

New member
Jul 28, 2010
628
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
People wearing Guy Fawkes masks at protests, particularly at protests that have something to do with government.


The Guy (get it?), was a Catholic fundamentalist who was attempting to destroy parliament so that he could install an even more oppressive regime.

He wasn't a freedom fighter, he was the exact fucking opposite.
That's not the reason most people wear those masks. It's something Anon has claimed as their own.
 

Logiclul

New member
Sep 18, 2011
293
0
0
maddawg IAJI said:
Logiclul said:
Scruffsss said:
Noala said:
the trend for people to say they are bi as a fashion statement
Or when girls always say theyr'e bi to get guys' attentions. Grabbing your friends ass doesn't make you bi! It makes you a little strange!
What girl does that? I'd outcast her in an instant if I found out about that. And being bisexual isn't attractive, it just makes things awkward.

I also hate the gay pride, the weed pride protests. I want weed to be illegal, and for homosexuality to be a dont-ask-dont-tell policy nationwide just because of all the morons advocating for the opposite.
For the former, there isn't anything wrong with marijuana and it is said to have some minor medical purposes. That's more then can be said for Cigarettes, which are legal.

As for the latter, you'd deny a basic civil right out of spite?

Lets take some quick facts down, just want to make sure we are on the same page

- It is the case that marijuana vastly harms the brain
- It is the case that cigarettes mildly harm the brain
- It is the case that both items over (long-cigarettes, short-marijuana) periods of time, that brain function will cease.
- It is the case that it is different to various degrees for everyone
- It is the case that marijuana has minor medical aide
- It is the case that marijuana is already prescribed as medicine when needed
- It is the case that cigarettes are legal
- It is the case that marijuana is illegal
- Cigarettes are considered bad, and many people are trying to get them abolished
- You are trying to justify legalizing casual use of marijuana with an example of something that is a) far less inherently harmful b) not fully accepted by society

As for the gays things, I believe that that policy should be enacted, and it isn't out of spite, rather it is the case that because they are being so vocal of their belief, and I'd rather not know, I'd like a law that protects that desire.
 

Harry Mason

New member
Mar 7, 2011
617
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
Harry Mason said:
But haven't you read any of the other posts on this thread? They say that racism and sexism "aren't really problems anymore!" That's good. It means we can all relax, right? The problems have just gone away, and anyone who brings up sexism or racism is just doing so to manipulate other people! I'm glad I don't have to worry my little white, heterosexual, male head anymore. Moral quandaries are inconvenient and confusing!
XD. I love it.

Seriously, a bunch of entitled privileged kids on the internet always seem to make that argument.

Because if a white, middle class teenage male doesn't see it, it doesn't exist.

It is funny, especially, because we ARE currently voting on minority rights, and the rights of women, in this country. right now. But minorities are totally equal, MIRITE???

On a similar note, I love how you can look at a rather diverse crowd on Wall Street, which includes veterans and even fiscal conservatives, and go RAWR FUCK YOU HIPPIES!

It's like people are looking for a reason to hate. From their comfy chairs and lives where they've probably never made a stand. Nor had to.
I mean, I AM a white, middle class heterosexual male, and the only thing I have to do to see all the crazy civil rights shenanigans still going on is to look around me and PAY ATTENTION. I'm part of my college's pride organization and I call myself a feminist and read feminist literature and volunteer my time tutoring kids in the projects down the street, and all sorts of other hippie things, but all I ever seem to get for it is shit. Like I'm somehow a poser because I care about things other than myself. Seriously. I have a shirt that says "This is what a feminist looks like" and I've been accused, so many times I stopped counting, of wearing it "just to get laid."

I feel like making a stand about things that don't involve me, because they involve my friends. As soon as the kid you grew up with gets the shit beaten out of him on the way home from school because he was seen with his boyfriend in public, gay rights really does start to effect you, in a very real, personal way.

I agree that too many people think ignoring things makes them go away.

Also, I didn't notice how funny all the accusing the Wall Street protesters of being hippies was until you mentioned that. Maybe we need to come up with an even wider hateful term for people who make a stand when something troubles them!
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
Pop "music" and Autotune.
I'm sorry, but this deluge of generic hip-hop and party songs doesn't even begin to approach listenable for me anymore. And it's fucking EVERYWHERE I GO NOW.

I can admit when my opinion or bias gets in the way of appreciation; I love playing music (when I can).
But this is a case where I have just run out of patience: Autotune has to go. I don't care how pretentious or snobbish it makes me sound, but I cannot stand to listen to this "musical" drone-buzzing anymore.

If it were up to me, every single "artist" that relies on it would be out of work TOMORROW and the autotune system absolutely forbidden from being used for any purpose other than satire; at least on the radio.
Se, when I hear an autotuned song, I can hear how hard the software is working to "correct" the singer's voice, and the harder it works, the more it "buzzes" (the only way I can describe it).
It sounds like this modulating tonal "buzzing", as if Autotune and the singer's incompetency are engaging in a war over that sound channel.

Father Time said:
What's about 5x worse is the idea that anyone who has a religion must be an idiot who doesn't think rationally, doesn't use science and uses their god as an explanation for everything.
Entirely too true, and all too common; especially on the Internet.
Oh the stories I could tell of supreme idiocy, circular logic, and their arbitrary, often contradicting definitions of rational/irrational...
 

Kinkaido

New member
Aug 27, 2011
24
0
0
I hate all of these new reality shows about people doing their jobs. I mean, it could be interesting but do we really need multiple series about pawn shops, or gun stores, or logging companies... (I could go on)

Oh, and republicans in America misunderstanding Socialism as the government taking away all freedoms and converting to Communism. For example, the socialized healthcare = death panels thing from a few years ago.
 

Shadowhawk77

New member
Jul 30, 2011
55
0
0
Couple weeks ago there was a public speaker in my class and he said that when he was working as at a jail and he saw a man sagging his pants everyone would say "If you're sagging you're fagging"
This raises a major question... who the F@*( thought it was a good idea to wear at a public school. I mean c'mon even middle schoolers (and no doubt a few elementary kids) are doing this.
Its just too rediculous to believe they would think this is cool and even wear the pants so low they are falling down to the ankles if they dont hold it by the waist (which ends up well below their balls)
 

aba1

New member
Mar 18, 2010
3,248
0
0
Redlin5 said:
World hunger. Shouldn't we have fixed this by now? I mean by 2015 we're supposed to have flying cars and all that jazz so we should at least make sure people are eating...
That whole issue is a vicious circle that takes billions to break and no individual country and really break it in fact breaking it would take just about the whole world donating huge chunks of there salary towards breaking it which is why it has not happened. On the other hand it is slowly getting better as the standards of living increase I mean some places are still awful awful but on the large scale it is getting better.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Harry Mason said:
I mean, I AM a white, middle class heterosexual male, and the only thing I have to do to see all the crazy civil rights shenanigans still going on is to look around me and PAY ATTENTION.
A shame more people don't do that.

I'm part of my college's pride organization and I call myself a feminist and read feminist literature and volunteer my time tutoring kids in the projects down the street, and all sorts of other hippie things, but all I ever seem to get for it is shit. Like I'm somehow a poser because I care about things other than myself. Seriously. I have a shirt that says "This is what a feminist looks like" and I've been accused, so many times I stopped counting, of wearing it "just to get laid."
Well, damn, of course. Why else would you support women's rights?

I agree that too many people think ignoring things makes them go away.
I feel the need to post an excerpt from "Sweet Janine," a song from Jeffrey Gaines:

Well you're skating on a figure of eight
While there's pain and there's hate at your feet
And your Daddy's made clear
That there's nothing to fear
At least here on your street
I don't want to darken your door
I wouldn't want you shedding a tear dear
But you've got everything and still you want more
You could learn a little sharing
And just a tad of caring I fear
Sweet Janine what have you seen
And are you for real
Sweet Janine where have you been
And what do you feel?


Also, I didn't notice how funny all the accusing the Wall Street protesters of being hippies was until you mentioned that. Maybe we need to come up with an even wider hateful term for people who make a stand when something troubles them!
Its easier to pretend they're all hippies. :)

Early on, there were a lot of people at the "occupy" rallies who are or were Tea Partiers. It's absurd to try and play this up as a liberal thing, let alone a hippie-specific thing, but it's easy to just to stereotype, dismiss, and move on.

But really, who else would organise and protest, except them dirty hippies?
 

DBLT4P

New member
Jul 23, 2011
136
0
0
Political correctness. Full stop. Organic food, "we don't keep score," and extremism, zealotry, or fundamentalism of any kind.
 

BlueMage

New member
Jan 22, 2008
715
0
0
TestECull said:
BlueMage said:
They are not cars, you are NOT correctly licensed to drive one unless you hold at least an LR.
I parked my F150 next to a 2011 Honda Accord. They were the same size and they weigh the same.
Good for you skippy. Now tell me the brakes are the same and the handling is the same as well.

There is no extra hazard to you because of my 25 year old pickup.
Height difference, mostly. Or do you deny that your vehicle sits higher?

Stop trying to tell me I shouldn't be able to drive it because you don't like it.
We've covered this, but in short, no. You'll learn, either way.

Buy whatever shitty little supermicro you want, I don't care.
Excellent, then you're amenable to driving a vehicle that will still protect you without killing the other guy. Although it's quite telling that you automatically assume a smaller car is "shitty." Feeling a bit small elsewhere, hmm?

Your car, your rules. But stay the fuck out of my business
Again lad, we've covered this elsewhere.

if I want to own a pickup truck you have no right to tell me what I can and cannot drive.
Absolutely I do - recall that whole "demonstrably more intelligent than average" part. Entitles me to many, many things, including your women.

On top of that, I actually use my truck as a mother fucking truck. I tow shit with it, I push broken cars around, I carry heavy loads, and when the weather turns to shit and my mom's minivan breaks down yet again it is absolutely irreplaceable.
ASTOUNDING! You're perhaps in the 2 or 3% that ACTUALLY USE THE VEHICLE FOR WHAT IT'S INTENDED.

Hell, just two days ago I saved my friend a couple hundred bucks and helped him move, something I wouldn't have been able to do without a truck. On top of that, it's paid off, it's stone cold reliable, it's easy to maintain, and it puts a smile on my face every time it fires up.
Good for you skippy - my car gives me a smile every time it fires up too. Mostly because I know I'm paying a shit-tonne less to drive it than others while still enjoying superior performance.

At the very least, said dumb-fucks would be restricted from owning one.
And they're any less hazardous for the rest of us in a four thousand pound sedan as opposed to a four thousand pound pickup? Really? I fail to see your logic here. Doesn't matter what shape it is, two tons of plastic and computers is gonna hurt when it slams into your trunk lid.
In this, we don't disagree - the issue lies in WHERE that momentum is directed. Deny, if you would please, that the average pick-up sits higher than the average sedan.

You seem to think the problem is the vehicle. It isn't. It's the person driving it. They're a hazard in anything, doesn't matter the size. They're texting while driving, they're blitzed behind the wheel, putting on makeup, eating cereal, reading the paper, smacking the kids, adjusting the radio and getting laid instead of driving. They're going to crash regardless.
Given we know this (and believe me, we don't disagree on this) does it not make sense to limit the harm that can be caused? Risk management, it's pretty simple. I'd rather be hit by someone applying makeup in there *ahem* shitty supermicro than their pickup.

Surely you know what you're doing, so you wouldn't have anything to worry about, right?
Doesn't mean I should have to get a seperate license just because my vehicle of choice has a metal box on the back. And hey, lemme throw ya a curve ball:



Your proposed draconian regulation would put owners of that thing, which has a measly little 2.2L I4, gets 30MPG, weighs about 2500 pounds or so and is roughly the size of a small hatchback, to get some sort of heavy vehicle license. Way to go!
Absolutely you should - IT IS NOT A CAR, IT IS NOT WHAT YOU ARE LICENSED FOR. IT IS A TRUCK.

It does not brake like a car. It does not accelerate like a car. It does not handle like a car. And it does not hit in the same manner as a car.

Pardon me whilst I un-footnote this.
And don't try to tell me they're not common, they are. I personally know someone that has two, someone else that has one, and I see them on the road all the damn time. Americans love those little Toyotas as much as they love their Fords and Chevies, especially since they let you keep a truck and not put up with 15-17 to a gallon on average.
Yes, and if you absolutely must have a pickup, I'd suggest a hilux or a triton.

See how derptastic your idea is? It doesn't solve anything and it just discriminates against people who want a pickup truck.
It solves plenty - an aggressive driver in a hatch is still an aggressive driver. But the consequences of their stupidity is less likely to be the death of someone else. The folks that typically "want" a pickup (yours may be the rare instance where you have a genuine use for it, I'm willing to concede) are typically the last ones who should be in a pickup.

Instead of trying to legislate people into crummy little hatchbacks they don't want
Again insinuating that small cars have poor quality. I'm sensing a trend.

and forcing them to pay others to ship appliances home, just take the stupid drivers off the road.
I would love nothing better. Nothing. Incidentally, if you can't afford the shipping, maybe you shouldn't be buying to begin with...

Let those of us who can go five or six years without hitting anything have our trucks without any extra strings attached.
This is almost reasonable. I will add one string however - you remain in the (in your case) far-right lane. That's where trucks belong.

We already put up with the damn things struggling to break 15-17MPG and requiring rather expensive tires, no need to add more fees at the DMV on top of that.
And see, this is the bit that I don't understand - you accept they have poor consumption, you accept that they have additional expenses that you simply would not have if you had a real car instead of a truck ... yet you cling. Boggles the mind.

So what you're saying is, America, land of the large, is supersizing sedans too?
I'm comparing to a four door 2011 Accord. If you want to ***** about the size of that, go to Tokyo.
Euro or standard? There is a difference.

And what manner of engine/suspension mods?
Lower, stiffer, more taut, more power, more torque, proper six speed manual, roll cage, removing things like ABS, TCM, stability management and other assorted overcomplications, lightening, things like that.
Alright, I can appreciate that - I admit, I was worried you were going to jack the suspension up even higher.

Hell no. I want my power as soon as I open the throttle, not five seconds later. And I'd like to hear the engine, not a turbine.
Oh they're not that bad anymore. Hell, get a super-turbo combo if you're that worried, you'll even get better mileage out of the bargain.

To what purpose?
To carve corners. I've got the reliable old pickup for putzing around and handling snow, I want something that handles well in the dry. I don't care about economy, gas is cheap here, so I'm fine with a 7.0L supercharged Corvette engine in it.
Ok, NOW it makes sense.

Actually, being of demonstrably higher intelligence than most, yes, yes I do know what's best.
Well there goes any hint of credibility you had left. Condescending, "I'm better than you" attitudes are a sure sign of an arse, and I refuse to deal with arses.
You already are, so let's continue, shall we?

You have no business telling me, John Doe, Barack Obama, Jeremy Clarkson or Tom Cruise what to drive or how to live. You don't know our situations, you don't know our preferences, you don't have any business trying to tell us what we want.
Nor do I need to. Some things are, simply put, objectively better, regardless of situation or preference.

If you were truly as intelligent as you claim to be you wouldn't be sitting here trying to tell people you've never met and likely live in an entirely different country what they can and can't drive.
Guaranteed you live in a different country, which is meaningless to this conversation.


I don't want to come off as condescending
Mission failed, bro. Mission epically failed. You've managed to come off so condescending you broke my "Pretentiousness" meter. Spun the needle around three times and slung it out of the housing. But that's fine, because I'm not going to reply to you any further. As I just said, I don't deal with arses.
I'm guessing your sarcasm meter needs a tune-up then, eh?

Not quite. In public, there is no expectation of privacy - and the government is obliged to protect its citizens.
The government is obliged to protect them, but it isn't obliged to watch their every movement.
They're not - they're watching what you do in public. Which the government, and anyone else, is perfectly entitled to do. Seeing as, y'know, you're not in a private space.

Why not? Explain to me why it doesn't.
A balaclava, generic hoodie, generic blue jeans, generic sneakers and some generic gloves render the cameras 100% fucking useless for catching crims. 100% fucking useless.
Except by that point, they're being tracked by physical officers as well. Certain traits set off alarm bells, no?

I'm suspecting it's more you have a distrust of authority in general
I genuinely feel sorry for anyone naive enough to trust the US Government to do anything. Even something so mundane as the brand of coffee served in the white house is something they'll manage to cock up. Get the public used to constant surveillance in public and soon enough you'll get cameras on your dashboard by law. And then, once the public is used to that, they'll start putting them in your living room.
No paranoia there, not at all.

The US Government can not be trusted. End of story. They've proved this time and time again.
Any of them? Any at all? Granted, it's easy enough to tell when a politician is lying (the lips are moving) but surely that simply makes them predictable, no?

simply see "progress" as their means of increasing their control, hmm?
Progress isn't watching every single citizen take a shit in the off chance they might have a stroke or mug somebody. Progress is, say, balancing the mother fucking budget. Progress would be doing something about the corruption in the government. Progress could be measured as getting our balls out of China's hand.
You'd need to all breed far more than you do, and be willing to settle for far less to achieve that last one, unfortunately.
 

IamQ

New member
Mar 29, 2009
5,226
0
0
Charvale said:
Fashion trends that make children look like street walking whores.

Yes, if you're 16 and older, and you want to show off a little more skin, then that's your prerogative as someone coming into adulthood, what I'm talking about is the constant look of 3rd, 4th, and 5th graders who wear clothing that just five years ago was popular with the prostitution sect. As a father of two girls, I will be damned if my daughters will be allowed to wear anything revealing or "sexy" until they're 16. After that, it's their choice, but by then I hope that both are going to have some sense of modesty and self respect not to dress in something that advertises free sex.
This, sorta. I don't have anything against revealing clothing, and if a 11-year old is comfortable with it, then sure, let it be.

It's just that it's really awkward for me, because if I look around and see someone between 9-12 that's walking around in hot-pants and a tank-top, then that always makes me feel like a pedophile.
 

Michael Hirst

New member
May 18, 2011
552
0
0
Online passes and drm, just generally people who play by the book getting dicked by publishers because they couldn't compete in the capitalist system
 

Entropyutd

New member
Apr 12, 2010
189
0
0
MysticToast said:
Political correctness. It's gotten to the point of being ridiculous. You can barely say anything anymore without anyone getting offended and all up in arms about it.
How dare you? I am well within my rights to get up in arms about things. Liberals like you have always had an agenda to stop arms being put up.
Please refrain from any more offensive outbursts.

and yeah.. what MysticToast said :D
 

Colour Scientist

Troll the Respawn, Jeremy!
Jul 15, 2009
4,722
0
0
Spot1990 said:
There's a campaign going now "Ireland v Tobacco" which aims "to hold tobacco companies accountable for the damage they inflict on society". Fuck that, I and anyone like me chose to smoke. I'm accountable for my own actions.
It's ridiculous. It's like be suing a furniture manufacturer because I stubbed my toe on a table (which is unnecessarily painful).
That proposal to ban smoking in cars where people under 16 are present is ridiculous too. At least give people a chance to have common sense. If they can ban it in cars, what's to top them pushing the ban into private residences?
 
Aug 1, 2010
2,768
0
0
I'm getting pretty sick of ignorant people putting down the Wall Street protest.

Most of these people don't even know whats going on. They just insult the occupiers because it seems cool.
 

Bazaalmon

New member
Apr 19, 2009
331
0
0
Reverse Racism. Just because slavery happened, some african-americans feel like they're entitled to hate any and all white people for any reason. Also, I'm pretty sure that the white guy you're yelling at was NOT THERE, being that it was over 140 years ago.

I know that slavery was one of America's worst sins, and is truly one of the most despicable things that has happened in our history. That said, I'm sure that almost everyone knows that, so stop going on as if it's our fault.

Racism is still going on today; I'm not denying that. but being racist back doesn't help anything.

Also, DRM. It sucks.